9

Here is the one hundred fifty-eighth article in our Republicans on Parade series, featuring individuals who personify what the Republican Party has become. Today’s winner is Republican Disinformation Officer Sarah Upchuckabee Sanders. She is so honored for lying repeatedly in service of her adored Fuhrer and the Republican Reich.

Press secretary Sarah Sanders was caught lying several times in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, and now she’s defending herself with more misdirections.

During a string of media appearances following the release of the Mueller report on Thursday, Sanders has faced questions about a claim she made during a May 2017 press briefing that she later admitted was false during testimony to Mueller’s team. In an attempt to justify President Donald Trump’s decision to fire then FBI director James Comey, Sanders told reporters that “countless members of the FBI” had contacted her to say they had lost confidence in Comey, when in fact that wasn’t the case.

On Thursday evening and Friday morning, Sanders repeatedly downplayed that lie as a mere “slip of the tongue.” But as ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pointed out to her in an interview on Friday morning, she used the line about “countless members of the FBI” multiple times in the days following Comey’s firing — a revelation undercutting her claim that she merely misspoke.

“You said it was a ‘slip of the tongue’ when you talked about ‘countless FBI members,’ yet you repeated it twice the very next day,” Stephanopoulos said. “That’s not a slip of the tongue, Sarah, that’s a deliberate false statement.”

Sanders, however, refused to own it, and bizarrely blamed her lie on Democrats….  [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Vox>

Well, I suppose it was “countless” to the extent that one cannot count to zero.

Lawrence O’Donnell has more.

Here’s what amazes me most.  I can’t believe that this is Upchuckabee’s first parade?  How did such an obvious recipient slip under my radar for so long?!!? I’m so ashamed!

RESIST!!

The Mueller Report was not as redacted as many expected, myself included.  It lays out a compelling case for future charges of Obstruction of Justice against Putin’s Puppet, Resident Donald Trump, aka the Orange Obstructer.  Despite a centrist article and over 50 minutes of video coverage, we are barely scratching the surface here.  I can promise more coverage over time.

For nearly a month, the American public has been under the impression, thanks to a four-page “summary” by Attorney General William Barr, that Robert Mueller could not decide whether President Donald Trump had obstructed justice because of “difficult questions of law and fact.” Barr suggested that the special counsel, after 22 months of investigation, simply couldn’t make up his mind and left it to his boss to decide.

Now that we have seen almost the entire report of more than 400 pages, we know Barr intentionally misled the American people about Mueller’s findings and his legal reasoning. As a former federal prosecutor, when I look at Mueller’s work, I don’t see a murky set of facts. I see a case meticulously laid out by a prosecutor who knew he was not allowed to bring it.

Mueller’s report detailed extraordinary efforts by Trump to abuse his power as president to undermine Mueller’s investigation. The case is so detailed that it is hard to escape the conclusion that Mueller could have indicted and convicted Trump for obstruction of justice—if he were permitted to do so. And the reason he is not permitted to do so is very clear: Department of Justice policy prohibits the indictment of a sitting president.

Mueller still could have reached a conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, but he believed it would be unfair to reach a conclusion that Trump could not rebut in court. How do we know this? Because Mueller says it. If he had reached a conclusion that Trump obstructed justice, Mueller wrote, Trump could not go to court to obtain a “speedy and public trial” with the “procedural protections” afforded to a criminal defendant by the Constitution…. [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Politico>

There’s no way around it.  Barrf lied.

To detail chargeable crimes in the report, here are two video clips.  The first is from Rachel Maddow.

The second is from Jesse Dollemore.  His channel is here.

Next, now that we know, what do we do about it?  Jerry Nadler [D-NY] has subpoenaed the full Mueller Report.  That’s a good move, but the Republican Reich will tie that up in court for months.  The best way for Congress to see the entire report is to open an impeachment investigation.  That provides Congress the legal standing to be granted access to the report and all underlying  material.  If we don’t have the support of enough Senate Republicans to convict, for their own self-preservation, there’s no need to conclude the investigation with Articles of Impeachment.

My biggest concern is, if Trump gets away with this, it will embolden future Republicans to commit even more heinous crimes.

RESIST!!

The redacted version of the Mueller Report has been released, and I have a link to a PDF copy of that report.  However, before that was released, Coverup General William Barr, aka Barrf, did his nest to misrepresent its contents in order to protect his Fuhrer.  He did a poor job. In fact, Barrf Barrfed.

Attorney General William Barr’s Thursday morning press conference on special counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia report was a whitewash.

There’s no other way to describe it. Barr, who claimed beforehand that the press conference would focus on process, spun the report’s conclusions before it was released and expected reporters to ask questions about a document they had not even seen. He literally uttered the phrase “no collusion” to describe Mueller’s conclusions — providing a perfect sound bite to play on loop on cable news in the president’s favorite phrasing.

Barr repeated this and similar talking points multiple times during his prepared statement. He put tremendous effort into explaining why Trump’s behavior during the probe should be seen as justified and in no way constituted obstruction. He even praised the president for providing “unfettered access” to documents and said the White House “fully cooperated” with the investigation, despite Trump’s refusal to submit to an interview with Mueller.

At the end, when a reporter asked if it was improper for the attorney general to spin the report to the public before it was released, Barr literally walked off the stage.

Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is generally respected by Trump critics, stood next to Barr silently.

It was a spectacle that said more about Barr and the way the Mueller report has been twisted by partisan politics than the report itself….  [emphasis added]

Inserted From <Vox>

Don’t take my word for it.  Decide for yourself.  CSPAN recorded Barrf’s presser.

Barrf Bag Alert!!

What do you think?

Finally, click here to read the redacted Mueller Report.

I’ll have to depend on others to dig out the dirt.  I have a copy, but my eyes are not capable of evaluating it.  Go for it.

RESIST!!