It’s a cool, sticky day here in the CatBox. 64° and thunderstorms (rare here) are forecast, and the humidity is 92%. Oh God it’s Monday hugs to all.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:00 (average 4:38). To do it, click here. How did you do?
Cartoon:
Religious Agony:
An Official put time on the clock in error. That allowed the Bears to kick the winning field goal after time had expired. May the Righteous Orb blast that ref with Holy lightning right between the cheeks!!
Short Takes:
From YouTube (Jesse Dollemore Channel): Tomi Lahren on Fox and Declares Her Need to be Armed For Use Against Military, Cops, and Immigrants!
Barf Bag Alert!!
But Jesse, should we be surprised at Tomi Turd’s stupidity? The Republican Reichsministry of Propaganda, Faux Noise, specializes in stupidity… and greed… and hate. RESIST!!
Wonderful job, Don! You could not have pegged Bought Bitch Moscow Mitch more perfectly. RESIST!!
From Daily Kos: There’s much to hate about Lindsey Graham and the submissive puppet to Donald Trump that he has become since McCain’s death. Yet at the very least, he is honest about the kind of person he’s become. He no longer pretends to be a moderate or a “principled” conservative.
Susan Collins is a rightwing hack who masquerades as a “moderate” in order to keep her job in a blue state. Sure, she may vote against the worst impulses of her party—usually during an election year—but here’s the key: only if her vote won’t make the difference.
Harry Reid put it best on Susan Collins: “She’s always there when you don’t need her vote.” Despite having numerous opportunities, Collins always passes at being the deciding vote against her party, no matter what. It’s this grift that makes Trump blush, and it’s why the hardliners love how she plays her constituents for fools.
The most recent example was just this past Thursday, at the Senate Appropriations Committee meeting. Collins has repeatedly and forcefully claimed that she is opposed to Trump stealing money from our military community to build a wall that Mexico was supposed to pay for.
Goose-step Gordon Smith [R-OR] used to do the same thing, until we fired him and replaced him with Jeff Merkley. Now, Collins, a fascist Republican goose-stepper REALLY IS the least extreme Republican in the Senate, and she’s deplorable! Every Republican in office is one Republican too many! RESIST!!
It’s the first fall-like day, here in the CatBox, with a forecast high of only 64°. I still have to run the A/C to counter the heat my Oxygen concentrator puts out. WWWendy will be here in under an hour, and we have lots of chores. Therefore, this is today’s only article. Ellipsoid Orb Hugs!
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:21 (average 5:33). To do it, click here. How did you do?
Cartoon:
Short Takes:
From YouTube (a blast from the past): Crosby Stills Nash – Carry On / Questions
Several projectiles struck the Abiqaiq plant, starting a series of fires that quickly took out nearly half Saudi’s oil production — 5% of the global daily output — and sparking fears about the security of the world’s oil supplies.
It’s unclear when Abiqaiq, which is operated by Saudi giant Aramco, will be fully operational again.
Houthi rebels in Yemen claimed the attack, saying that 10 drones had targeted Abiqaiq, as well as the Khurais oilfield. But attacks of this scale and accuracy would represent a sudden and remarkable increase in Houthi capabilities, and neither the United States nor Saudi Arabia is buying the claim.
The Republican Reich blames Iran. That they say it is good cause to doubt it. Either way, fill your gas tank today. This will raise gas prices. RESIST!!
From Haaretz: …Netanyahu is misappropriating his job as prime minister. Another term would probably leave Israel’s democratic institutions, built through great work and years of care, in ruins. The damage Netanyahu will leave behind will be difficult to repair. On Tuesday, at the voting booths, the people must end his reign.
That comes from a leading Israeli news service. May the political demise of both Butcher Bibi [R-IS] and Fuhrer Drumpfenfarten [R-Hades] be rapid and complete! RESIST!!
I agree. The Jewish state has a right to exist, and Bibi-ism is not Zionism. However the Palestinian state has an equal right to exist, and Butcher Bibi must be prevented from achieving a one-state solution by force.
I’m very tired here in the CatBox. I finally got everything fixed, but it was 4 PM, when I did. So I missed my nap. Tomorrow is a Holy day in the Church of the Ellipsoid Orb. My Broncos are meditating with the Bears, but the game won’t be televised here. May the Holy Ellipsoid Orb bless your team unless they bearly shit in the woods. Tomorrow is also a WWWendy day, and we have lots to do, so please expect no more than a Personal Update. Weekend Hugs to all.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:04 (average 4:40). To do it, click here. How did you do?
If we are blessed with a Democratic President, a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate, all will be on or near the same page. The debate moderators should stop trolling for ratings and ask realistic questions. RESIST!!
Of course the Reich on the left, Robert Reich is right. The Reich on the right, the Republican Reich, is incompetent at everything except, spreading hate and violence, giving your money to billionaires, and stealing power. RESIST!!
From YouTube (a blast from the past): The Troggs – Wild Thing
Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”
Today’s article does not really contain any new information, even to the furies, but it puts a great deal of information together which we have looked at sepratatey, and does so at a good time. If you think you have already seen this article this week, you have – because The Conversation uses a Creative Commons license, it is easy tp republish their material, and several good sites did. But that only shows how important the information is. And, if you missed it, it might be easier to find it hear to review down the road than many of the other places it’s found.
==================================================================
What the Russians used to accomplish this is called “disinformation,” which is false or misleading content intended to deceive or promote discord. Now, with the first presidential primary vote only five months away, the public should be aware of the sources and types of online disinformation likely to surface during the 2020 election.
First, the Russians will be back. Don’t be reassured by the notorious Russian Internet Research Agency’s relatively negligible presence during last year’s midterm elections. The agency might have been keeping its powder dry in anticipation of the 2020 presidential race. And it helped that U.S. Cyber Command, an arm of the military, reportedly blocked the agency’s internet access for a few days right before the election in November 2018.
Temporarily shutting down the Internet Research Agency won’t be enough to stop the flow of harmful content. Lee Foster, who leads the disinformation team at the cybersecurity firm FireEye, told me in an interview that the agency is “a small component of the overall Russian operation,” which also includes Moscow’s military intelligence service and possibly other organizations. Over time, Foster said, “All of these actors rework their approaches and tactics.”
And there’s more to fear than just the Russians. I’m the author of a new report on disinformation and the 2020 election published by the New York University Stern Center for Business and Human Rights. In the report, I predict that the Russians won’t be alone in spreading disinformation in 2020. Their most likely imitator will be Iran, especially if hostility between Tehran and Washington continues to mount.
While foreign election interference has dominated discussion of disinformation, most intentionally false content targeting U.S. social media is generated by domestic sources.
I believe that will continue to be the case in 2020. President Trump often uses Twitter to circulate conspiracy theories and cast his foes as corrupt. One story line he pushes is that Facebook, Twitter and Google are colluding with Democrats to undermine him. Introducing a right-wing “social media summit” at the White House in July, he tweeted about the “tremendous dishonesty, bias, discrimination, and suppression practiced by certain companies.”
Supporters of Democrats also have trafficked in disinformation. In December 2017, a group of liberal activists created fake Facebook pagesdesigned to mislead conservative voters in a special U.S. Senate race in Alabama. Matt Osborne, who has acknowledged being involved in the Alabama scheme, told me that in 2020, “you’re going to see a movement toward [political spending from undisclosed sources] on digital campaigns in the closing days of the race.” He suggests there could be an effort to discourage Republicans from voting with “an image of a red wave with a triumphal statement that imbues them with a sense of inevitable victory: ‘No need to bother voting. Trump has got it in the bag.’”
Spreading fake videos
Also likely to surface next year: “deepfake” videos. This technique produces highly convincing – but false – images and audio. In a recent letter to the CEOs of Facebook, Google and Twitter, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, wrote: “A timely, convincing deepfake video of a candidate” that goes viral on a platform “could hijack a race – and even alter the course of history. … The consequences for our democracy could be devastating.”
Just one example of a deepfake video.
Instagram could be a vehicle for deepfakes. Owned by Facebook, the photo and video platform played a much bigger role in Russia’s manipulation of the 2016 U.S. election than most people realize, and it could be exploited again in 2020. The Russian Internet Research Agency enjoyed more user engagement on Instagram than it did on any other platform, according to a December 2018 report commissioned by the Senate Intelligence Committee. “Instagram is likely to be a key battleground on an ongoing basis,” the report added.
Companies could step up
The social media companies are responding to the problem of disinformation by improving their artificial intelligence filters and hiring thousands of additional employees devoted to safety and security. “The companies are getting much better at detection and removal of fake accounts,” Dipayan Ghosh, co-director of the Harvard Kennedy School’s Platform Accountability Project, told me.
But the companies do not completely remove much of the content they pinpoint as false; they merely reduce how often it appears for users, and sometimes post a message noting that it’s false.
In my view, provably false material should be eliminated from feeds and recommendations, with a copy retained in a cordoned-off archive available for research purposes to scholars, journalists and others.
Another problem is that responsibility for content decisions now tends to be scattered among different teams within each of the social media companies. Our report recommends that to streamline and centralize, each company should hire a senior official who reports to the CEO and is responsible for overseeing the fight against disinformation. Such executives could marshal resources more easily within each company and more effectively coordinate efforts across social media companies.
Finally, the platforms could also cooperate more than they currently do to stamp out disinformation. They’ve collaborated effectively to root out child pornography and terrorist incitement. I believe they now have a collective responsibility to rid the coming election of as much disinformation as possible. An electorate that has been fed lies about candidates and issues can’t make informed decisions. Votes will be based on falsehoods. And that means the future of American democracy – in 2020 and beyond – depends on dealing effectively with disinformation.
==================================================================AMT, please help us to keep our heads straight – and help us to help pthers do the same.
Last night I watched the Democratic Debate. I’ll include my own opinions later, but to start, I have part of an excellent analysis and the complete video clip, so you can watch it, if you haven’t already, judge for yourselves. Vote Blue No Matter Who!
Elizabeth Warren 7.5/10
Gail Collins (9/10) — Great at bringing things back to the corruption issue and talking about being a public school teacher.
Ross Douthat (6/10) — Another solid performance overall, but she lost the opening exchange on health care and disappeared entirely for the first hour.
Maureen Dowd (6/10) — More free stuff and Aunt Bee! Warren’s expertise is appealing in the age of Trump, though, like President Obama, she tends to lecture.
Michelle Goldberg (7/10) — She’s so good at this, but still hasn’t figured out how to address the anxieties a lot of people have about Medicare for All. And it was disappointing that she didn’t get to engage more with Biden, especially on issues like the 2005 bankruptcy bill.
David Leonhardt (8/10) — No Democratic politician today, on that stage or not, is better at communicating economic ideas. She makes them personal and political. Still she’s vulnerable on Medicare for All.
Miriam Pawel (9/10) — Consistently strong across a range of issues, unruffled by Biden’s attacks on health care, she got stronger as the debate went on — with points for fortitude and versatility.
Melanye Price (9/10) — She feels more emotionally authentic and accessible than any other candidate. She gets to the heart of things about educational costs and what it feels like to claw for opportunities when the odds seem stacked against you. While most of the candidates tonight seemed battle weary, she came off as roaring to fight more.
Mimi Swartz (7/10) — She did fine, and maybe that’s all she had to do.
Pete Wehner (5/10) — She was highly evasive on her health care plan and overall she was completely forgettable. Invoking Jay Inslee as a trailblazer mean you’ve by definition had a subpar night. After several good debate performances, she lost altitude in Houston.
Will Wilkinson (8/10) — She excelled in her allotment with a typical blend of folksy charm, masterful lucidity and passionate corporation bashing.
Tanzina Vega (8/10) — Warren may have a plan for everything but she continued to skirt the question about how much her health care plan would raise taxes on American families. But she is consistent, and at a certain point maybe Democratic voters will also agree that she “knows what’s broken” and “how to fix it.”
In their graphic (interactive there), the further to the right the candidate is The better they did. So according to these journalists, on average, Warren won going away, Harris was second, Booker was third, Buttikieg was fourth, O’Rourke was fifth, Biden was sixth, Sanders was 7th, all tightly spaced, Klobuchar was 8th, Castro was 9th and Yang was a joke. I shared only the commentary on Warren. Click through for the other nine candidates and to play with the interactive article.
I would have put Beto in third and Sanders in fourth.
Here is the full debate. It’s 2 hrs. 31 min. long.
Here is my final thought. I think Liz needs to alter her interpretation of Medicare for All, because she will need the support of labor and less informed voters in November. Union members who have negotiated Cadillac health plans will freak, if those plans are threatened. In addition, far too many voters are so poorly informed that they will vote against their self-interest out of fear. I think that Liz should give people the option to opt out, if they want to keep their private plans. Once they see how much better off people on the single-payer plan are, they will opt-in soon enough.