May 122020
 

The world is dealing with an unprecedented health crisis caused by a new virus. With new insights in the way COVID19 spreads, in the way the virus behaves and in the way to deal with the pandemic every day, it is now more important than ever to safeguard the information we share is accurate and fact-based. We have to inoculate ourselves against the fake news and misinformation that infect our newsfeeds and timelines at this crucial moment by fact-checking.

For the duration of the pandemic, I will try to give you an overview of the main issues in CoronaCheck, an Australian email newsletter with the latest from around the world concerning the coronavirus.*


SOME SERIOUS ANTI-VAXXING

Image source: plandemicmovie.com

Regular Facebook users have almost certainly come across a viral video in recent days: the 27-minute trailer for a yet-to-be-released film called “Plandemic: The hidden agenda behind COVID-19” continues to spread widely despite censoring efforts by Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo and Twitter. The movie’s makers maintain it will “expose the scientific and political elite who run the scam that is our global health system”.

The glossy trailer features a long interview with Dr Judy Mikovits, described by the Washington Post as a “well-known figure in the anti-vaccination movement”.

According to PolitiFact, however, a number of the claims made by Dr Mikovits in the clip are “either unsupported or outright false”, including her claim that she was jailed without charge.

Dr Mikovits makes other claims without any evidence to support them, including that the coronavirus was “clearly manipulated”, that the virus is a derivative of SARS 1, that hydroxychloroquine is effective against coronaviruses generally and that the flu vaccine increases the odds of getting COVID-19 by 36 per cent. The fact-checkers also debunked Dr Mikovits’s claims that the flu vaccine contains coronaviruses and that wearing a mask can make you sick.

Retraction Watch, which tracks retractions of scientific studies, has published at least 10 posts on the discredited scientist since 2011.

 

DON’T QUIT SMOKING?

In late April, headlines suggested that according to a French study smokers may be less likely to contract the coronavirus. The study found that just 4.4 per cent of COVID-19 patients admitted to a Paris hospital were smokers, as were 5.3 per cent of people suffering from the virus at home but that the smoking rate in the general population is 40 per cent for people aged 44-53 and 11 per cent for 65-75 year-olds.

But USA Today pointed to an overview of studies observing the effects of nicotine in severe COVID-19 cases made by the US National Center for Biotechnology Information which found instead that “smoking is most likely associated with the negative progression and adverse outcomes of COVID-19”.

The newspaper also spoke to other researchers, who urged caution regarding the French study. Academics writing in The Conversation noted that the “counterintuitive results may be due to several biases”, that the study had yet to be peer-reviewed, and that it was completed at “pandemic speed”.

 

BILL GATES REVISITED

Image source: Facebook

In COVID-19 facts and fiction 3, several false claims about Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who seems to act as a lightning rod for coronavirus misinformation, especially it concerns a COVID-19 vaccine.

This time the false claim relates to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has contributed more than $250 million to the fight against the novel coronavirus.

A Facebook photo showing the outside of the foundation’s headquarters emblazoned with the sign “Centre for Global Population Reduction” was photoshopped, according to fact-checkers at Politifact, Snopes and Lead Stories.

“There is no such thing as the Center for Global Human Population Reduction,” Lead Stories concluded. “It is just one in a long chain of false rumours about Gates in circulation.”

 

WHO CREATES FAKE NEWS?

Image source: BBC

As we have seen in previous articles, misinformation and disinformation are being dispersed faster and more widely when riding on the back of the global health crisis. But who is responsible for starting and spreading rumours, hoaxes and conspiracies? According to the BBC, viral misinformation spreaders often fit into one of several categories.

  1. The ‘joker’, who posts misinformation for a laugh. The readers who aren’t in on the joke, pass it on as if it is true.
  2. The ‘scammer’, who uses the pandemic deliberately to fool people into handing over money.
  3. Politicians, such as US President Donald Trump
  4. Celebrities, for example, actor Woody Harrelson.
  5. Conspiracy theorists.
  6. And last but not least, relatives. “They’re trying to be helpful and they think they’re doing something positive,” the BBC suggests. “But, of course, that doesn’t make the messages they pass along true.”

 

WILDLIFE RETURNS

Image source: Facebook

We’ve all seen the many images of wildlife reclaiming urban centres in coronavirus lockdown, but some have been fake or misleading. In the newest example, fact-checkers at Snopes found that an image of hundreds of flamingos in the canals of Venice is the result of digital manipulation.

The photo was created by an artist on Instagram, who clearly categorized her image as “art” and told commenters the photo wasn’t real. On Facebook, however, the image has been shared more than 19,000 times, without any qualification.

 

FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.

In March, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg declared that the social media giant was tackling “misinformation that has imminent risk of danger”, including claims that drinking bleach could cure COVID-19, which he described as being “in a different class”.

However, when US President Donald Trump mused about introducing disinfectants and UV light into the body as potential treatments for the COVID-19, Facebook, as well as Twitter and YouTube, declined to remove Mr Trump’s statements, arguing that he did not specifically direct people to drink or inject disinfectants or use UV lighting in an attempt to cure or prevent the disease.

Mr Trump may not have given a specific directive but others did take the next step, and the social media companies can’t keep up.

According to an investigation by the New York Times, hundreds of Facebook groups and pages and thousands of tweets pushing unproven UV therapies remained live as of April 30, a week after Mr Trump’s comments. More than 5,000 posts, videos and comments promoting the use of disinfectants as a virus cure remained on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.

 

Things that don’t cure and/or prevent COVID-19

#22: CBD oil
There are no credible animal or human studies showing CBD [cannabidiol] has any effect on SARS-CoV-2 or the course of COVID-19 infection.” – Professor C. Michael White,  Head of the Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut, The Conversation

*The facts in this article are derived from the Australian RMIT ABC Fact Check newsletters which in turn draw on their own resources and those of their colleagues within the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), of which RMIT ABC Fact Check is a member.

Share

  7 Responses to “COVID-19 Fact and Fiction #6”

  1. Still reading, such a detailed, and informative post. 

    Thanks so much Lona, for your post, and getting the message out here. 
    Great job!!! 

  2. Great piece Lona! 02

    Fakebook: The only way to win is not to play.  Unplug!

    Fake News generators 1 – 5 are Republicans.

    SAVE the CBD Oil for cancer sufferers!

  3. I would think that listening to Milkoivts can make one sick!  I do not mean that in terms of following her advise, but just in terms of simply listening.  
    “FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.” So, along with the Kool-Aide, these fools are washing it down with bleach?  
    Thank you, Lona.  

  4. Another great article, Lona.
    I have never joined Fakebook and it’s times like this that I’m glad I never did. Seeing what they allow to be on their site amazes me.
    I have to agree with TC regarding the fake news spreaders. I feel tRump is the master winner of spreading the most lies regarding the virus. Plus all of his cronies and followers who feel his words are like gold and spread it everywhere.
    I appreciate all of the information you list and have been listing of things that don’t cure or prevent the virus too.
    Thanks Lona

  5. Thanks again, Lona for this information. Some random thoughts …

    I didn’t know “Retraction Watch” existed, but I’m surely glad that it does!

    I could believe that nicotine kills viruses, because it kills most everything. Including people who might take it in doses sufficient to kill this virus. (The mask picture is a hoot. Speaking of masks, Lovecrafts has a pattern for a knitted mask – actually two patterns now -which are free. Hand knitting is very porous, so in order to work, they need to be lined. I have seen water go through paper towels, and I have seen water go through high-thread-count cotton cloth, and I have seen water go through coffee filters, and my money is on the coffee filters.)

    I could almost feel sorry for Bill Gates. How did he get into the same category as George Soros?

    Another group which creates fake news is trolls, free lance or for hire.

    Ummmm – who is dumb enough to think that flamongos are native to Venice? Oh, yeah, that’s right Americans don’t do geography.

    Fakebook, Twitter and YouTube are just scared of him. And he could do them some damage if he turned on them, certainly. Apparently they think it’s worth it not to offend him.

    I find CBD helpful with arthritis – though not a cure. If it helps you, TC, go for it. Hemp is plentiful, so I’m sure there’s enough for both of us.

  6. Update on Facebook:

    [Facebook] said it put warning labels [emphasis mine] on about 50 million pieces of content related to COVID-19, after taking the unusually aggressive step of banning harmful misinformation about the new coronavirus at the start of the pandemic.

    “We have a good sense that these warning labels work. Ninety-five per cent of the time that someone sees content with a label, they don’t click through to view that content,” chief executive Mark Zuckerberg told reporters on a press call.

    In my opinion, putting on a label on content is not the same as banning it from the site. Even if the numbers quoted are to be believed, 5% of viewers clicking through despite the warning is 5% too many.

  7. The former researcher who is former because her work turned out to have been contaminated by her lab and her paper retracted when verified untrue (and no one could replicate) but in the meantime people were making money based on the untrue findings…and she finally admitted it, too (and some legal violations as problems began)…yet people choose to believe her vs. thousands of experts without sullied reputations because she says some things they want to believe–or what some are now calling magical thinking.
    Thanks Lona–tried to get here before when I was here for #7  but somehow couldn’t find the way–sorry for the delay.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.