Everyday Erinyes #172

 Posted by at 9:07 am  Politics
Jun 292019
 

Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”

Some days – some weeks – it seems as though the headlines in the mainstream media are being written by the Onion, or maybe by Andy Borowitz. These things just CAN’T really be happening, can they?

Well, sadly, yes.

Take, for example, this one –

Pregnant woman indicted for manslaughter after she is shot in the stomach by another woman

Here is, not the whole story, but a more detailed summary by Walter Einenkel:

27-year-old Alabama resident Marshae Jones was taken into custody after a Jefferson County grand jury indicted her on manslaughter charges. The charges stemmed from an incident between Jones and another woman, 23-year-old Ebony Jemison, in December of 2018. According to reports, the two women got into a fight that ended with Jemison reportedly shooting Jones. Jones, who was pregnant at the time, survived but miscarried her pregnancy. Initially, authorities tried to indict Jemison on manslaughter charges in the death of the unborn fetus. However, after a jury failed to indict her, authorities turned around and charged Jones.

Pleasant Grove police Lt. Danny Reid told reporters that “It was the mother of the child who initiated and continued the fight which resulted in the death of her own unborn baby,” saying that the fetus was the only real victim of the whole event. “She had no choice in being brought unnecessarily into a fight where she was relying on her mother for protection.” (emphasis mine)

Yes, you read that correctly.

A woman shot another woman, who was pregnant. The pregnant woman subsequently miscarried.

A grand jury refused to indict the woman who fired the shot.

However, a grand jury (I don’t know whether the same or another) had no difficulty indicting the woman who was shot.

Is this insane? Or am I insane?

Wlter Einenkel, a staff member at Daily Kos, is of course concerned about this case, but also about the legal precedent which is being set:

There is also a very real and disturbing legal precedent being set. Does this mean that once a woman is determined to be pregnant, she can be indicted of manslaughter or murder if she has a soft cheese, a glass of wine, or doesn’t have the prenatal bloodwork telling her she has gestational diabetes, resulting in a miscarriage? While not the norm, there are enough woman who do not realize they are even pregnant for long stretches of time that a television series once existed telling those stories. If any of those women had happened to miscarry, would they have been considered perpetrators of “negligent homicide?”

Anyone besides me having a flashback to Lindy Chamberlain?

Meanwhile, over in Tennessee, there’s this headline –

Low-Wage Workers Are Being Sued for Unpaid Medical Bills by a Nonprofit Christian Hospital That Employs Them

In case you don’t immediately wrap your head around that (There’s a lot to take in), here’s one example:

This year, a Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare housekeeper left her job just three hours into her shift and caught a bus to Shelby County General Sessions Court.

Wearing her black and gray uniform, she had a different kind of appointment with her employer: The hospital was suing her for unpaid medical bills.

In 2017, the nonprofit hospital system based in Memphis sued the woman for the cost of hospital stays to treat chronic abdominal pain she experienced before the hospital hired her.

She now owes Methodist more than $23,000, including around $5,800 in attorney’s fees.

It’s surreal, she said, to be sued by the organization that pays her $12.25 an hour. “You know how much you pay me. And the money you’re paying, I can’t live on,” said the housekeeper, who asked that her name not be used for fear that the hospital would fire her for talking to a reporter.

So, OK, granted that this employee’s medical expenses in question were incurred before she started working for the hospital in question (does HR have a policy of hiring people who owe them, in order to know where to find them in order to keep them in court? Seriously, in just about the last five years the hospital has filed over 8,300 lawsuits against patients – not all employees, but many were.) But another thing is, that the insurance provided to employees requires them to seek health care only through their employer, which has the least generous assistance program of any hospital in the area.

An expert in hospital billing practices said that if the hospital is suing a fair number of its own employees, it’s time to look both at the insurance provided to workers and the pay scale.

“One would hope that if this is an action being taken against a significant amount of employees, the hospital would look at the insurance they provide workers,” said Mark Rukavina, an expert in nonprofit hospitals and a manager at Community Catalyst, a health care advocacy organization.

“One would hope” – well, chalk up hope along with thoughts and prayers as things that don’t work, at least not without assistance from action.

Oh, and did I mention that this particular hospital happens to own a licensed collection agency? Hmmmmm.

Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone, please help us to realize that, as strange as the world, and in particular our nation, is becoming today, things like these are still not normal. And help us to do something about them.

The Furies and I will be back.

Cross posted to Care2 HERE.

Share
Jun 282019
 

Last night I watched the second night of the Democratic debate.  I’ll make this brief, because I agree with the following CNN article.

0628debate2

WINNERS

*Kamala Harris: The California Senator gave the strongest performance not just of Thursday night’s debate but of either nights’ debate. She was calm, poised, knowledgeable and, yes, presidential…

* Pete Buttigieg: If you knew nothing about Buttigieg going into Thursday night, you would have assumed from his performance that a) he was a senator or a governor who had been at this for a long time and b) a co-frontrunner with Harris in the race. That person would be stunned to learn that Buttigieg is currently the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and running at the back of the lead pack. He was serious, smart, thoughtful and probing. * Michael Bennet: Look, I don’t think that the Colorado senator is somehow going to shoot from 1% to relevance in the polls based on his performance in this debate. He wasn’t that good. But, for someone who a) no one knew going into this debate and b) had limited speaking opportunities to make his case, I thought Bennet performed well. Bennet’s incredulity with Biden’s belief that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would start working in a bipartisan way if the former vice president won the White House felt genuine — and was powerful. In short: Bennet came out of this debate looking better than he went into it. Which is a win.

LOSERS

*Joe Biden: Well, that went poorly. From the get-go, Biden seemed too rigidly attached to his stump speech and his talking points. He struggled to fit his points into the 60-second time limit. He got defensive — as we predicted — when Harris pushed him on his comments about segregationist Sen. James Eastland and his opposition to school busing and quite clearly lost the back and forth. Badly.

* Bernie Sanders: The Vermont senator learned a tough lesson Thursday night: Debating nine people as one of the frontrunners for the nomination is a very different beast than debating a single, establishment frontrunner when you are the freewheeling insurgent. Rather than passionate, Sanders came off as just plain loud. Rather than committed, he came across as repetitive. And, even worse, there were large periods of the debate where Sanders seemed to just plain disappear…

* Marianne Williamson: Watching the author and spiritual adviser on the debate stage reminded me of my own experience playing high school basketball: Hopelessly out of her league…

* Andrew Yang: Yang’s online army insisted that this first debate would be his break-out moment — a chance to push his message of the dangers of automation to the general public. The only thing that evoked automation was Yang; in the few moments when he spoke, he sounded like a robot.

* Eric Swalwell: You know that guy in high school who has a catchphrase? And, the first time you hear it, you’re like “That’s not bad!” But by the time he says it for the 30th time before lunch, you have to fight down the urge to vomit in your mouth? That’s Eric Swalwell and “pass the torch.”…

Inserted from <CNN>

I think that the only Kirsten Gellibrand was not included with the winners is that the moderators gage her so little time.

To watch the entire debate, click here.

Here are Key Moments from the NY Times.

At least they agreed on the need flush Putin’s Pervert. Biden’s deference to home rule on busing looks all too Republican. Slam dunk for Harris.

Here are some awkward moments from the Washington Post.

“My time’s up?” Biden surrendered and ducked.

I think Rachel Maddow was shell shocked.

I disagree with Rachel. Biden did back down by saying “I’m out of time,” when he could not answer Harris.

What did you think?

RESIST!!

VOTE BLUE!!

Share
Jun 282019
 

It’s a seasonal day here in the CatBox.  WWWendy left for Vegas at 4:00 AM.  I sure hope she does not become a showgirl.  For some reason, I woke up exhausted.  It was a real fight just to drag my ass out of bed.  TGIF Hugs.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:06 (average 4:53).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From YouTube (CNN Channel): Trump to Putin: Don’t meddle in the election

 

That evil smirk says it all. I bet a buck that both Fuhrer’s have already agreed to have Russia interfere in the 2020 election. RESIST!!

From YouTube (Robert Reich Channel): Robert Reich: Trump’s Secret Tax on Ordinary Americans

 

Of course the Reich on the left, Robert Reich, is right. Trump, Fuhrer of the evil Reich on the right, the Republican Reich, is lying about his tariffs. Foreigners don’t pay them. You do. Yjrn Re[ublicans use the money to give welfare to billionaires. RESIST!!

From The New Yorker: Millions of viewers of a televised debate Wednesday night found themselves struggling with the notion of a President with no visible personality disorder.

In interviews across the country, viewers said that they were having difficulty imagining a President who does not display flagrant signs of malignant narcissism, impulse-control deficit, or rampant paranoia.

“I kept trying to picture whether any of these people would be capable of insulting another country on Twitter to compensate for his or her own pathological sense of inadequacy,” Harland Dorrinson, who lives in Akron, Ohio, said. “None of them showed me that they have what it takes to do that.”

“A President should be ready, at a moment’s notice, to ridicule another person’s face,” Carol Foyler, of Nashville, said. “I didn’t see one person on that stage who seemed up to that task.”

Dang Andy! I don ‘t know what to say I’m quite sure Liz doesn’t want a Russian hooker. RESIST!!

Cartoon:

Share
Jun 272019
 

Last Night, I watched the first night of the first Democratic Debate.  The only negative performance, came from DeBlazio, who was aggressive and rude.  Most of the 2nd tier candidates did little to distinguish themselves.  The biggest exceptions were Inslee and Castro.  Among the top tier, both Klobuchar and Booker held their ground.  O’Rourke’s performance was weak.  But the hands down winner was Warren.  She was a rock star, but she did make one major mistake.

0627debate1

Elizabeth Warren came into Wednesday night’s debate as the candidate to watch most closely, the only one of the 10 onstage who had double-digit support in polls, with an apparent momentum that none of those rivals could claim.

Her performance over two hours in Miami probably strengthened that position.

During the first hour, Warren was crisper than most of her peers. She was clearer. I didn’t always like what she said. But she said it well, leaving no doubt about the direction in which she’d pull the country and giving voters a fair amount of detail, within the crushing constraints of time, about the map that she’d use to travel there.

Warren left no doubt, too, about the great villains in American life, at least in her view: “giant corporations.” She said the phrase repeatedly, with force and derision, and she never strayed far from it, framing just about every ill in American life as something caused or exacerbated by greed.

She has bet her entire bid for the presidency on that argument’s resonance with American voters, and on Wednesday night she doubled, tripled and quadrupled down. Elizabeth Warren was unswervingly true to Elizabeth Warren, which is precisely why she has caught fire and why she’ll continue to burn relatively bright. Her passion and confidence should petrify Bernie Sanders, whose song she sings better than he does…  [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

Warren’s mistake was making Medicare for All mandatory.  That may keep Sanders from getting to her, but Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and the Republican Reich millions on adds that Democrats are taking away voters’ insurance.  She should adjust her position to Medicare for All Who Want it, while also making it available for Companies to and Unions to pay premiums for employees and members.  Private Insurance would soon be reduced to supplemental policies and advantage plans.

Here’s a link to the entire debate.

Here’s Key Moments from the NY Times.

 

Here’s Best One Liners from the Washington Post.

 

Here’s coverage from MSNBC.

 

I shared my take.  What’s yours?

RESIST!!

VOTE BLUE!!

Share

Samantha Bee from 6/26

 Posted by at 10:47 am  Politics
Jun 272019
 

It’s that time of week again, and here are four excellent video clips from Sam’s show last night.  Enjoy!

How to Cover Sexual Assault Allegations Against the President

 

I wonder how many dozen more women are too traumatized by Resident Pussy Grabber to come forward.

A Debate Showdown in South Beach

 

LOL Sam! The only one actually that aggressive was DeBlasio.

Goodbye, Huck-a-bot

 

Huck-a-bot is more honest than Upchuckabee.

How US Meddling in Central America Created the Modern Day Border Crisis

 

I wish the issue were such that there was something funny Sam could have said. Sadly this is completely true.

Amen, Sam!

RESIST!!

Share
Jun 272019
 

It’s a tired day here in the CatBox.  It was so muggy, I slept poorly, after staying up to watch the debate.  It’s a good thing WWWendy is coming this evening, before her raucous expedition to the City of Sin. I need a shower so bad, I can  almost taste it.  YUCK!

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:08 (average 4:34).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From YouTube (RWW Channel): RWW News: Mike Heath Says That ‘Homosexuals Are Worse Than Murderers’

Barf Bag Alert!!

 

The only souls that should matter to these Republican Supply-side pseudo-Christians (the exact opposite of real Christians) are the souls that they are: ass-souls! RESIST!!

From Washington Post: The Supreme Court’s conservatives decided Thursday that federal courts do not have a role to play in deciding whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far.

The 5 to 4 decision was written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and joined by the court’s other conservatives.

“We conclude that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.,” Roberts wrote. “Federal judges have no license to reallocate political power between the two major political parties, with no plausible grant of authority in the Constitution, and no legal standards to limit and direct their decisions.”

Justice Elena Kagan dissented for the court’s liberals. “For the first time ever, this court refuses to remedy a constitutional violation because it thinks the task beyond judicial capabilities,” she wrote.

We can lay this horrendous decision by SCROTUS (Republican anti-Constitutional VD) at the feet of Bought Bitch Mitch for stealing the seat that went to Injustice Whoresuch and forcing the confirmation of criminally pervert Kava-Nazi. RESIST!!

From NBC News: The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration cannot include a question about citizenship on the 2020 census form that goes to every U.S. household, giving a win to populous states that said it would discourage legal and illegal immigrants from responding and make the population count less accurate.

The ruling was a setback for the Trump administration’s tough position on immigration. It was also a surprise, because it appeared in April when the case was argued that the court’s five-member conservative majority was prepared to rule that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross acted within his authority to add the question. They seemed to agree with the Justice Department that Ross’ decision was a rational one, balancing the need for more information against concerns about accuracy. But in the decision Thursday, the court found that while the department of commerce has a right to reinstate the question, it did not provide an adequate justification for doing so.

That should kill it for the 2020 census, as the forms deadline is in three days.  I’m shocked. Chief Injustice Roberts voted No in a 5-4 decision. RESIST!!

Cartoon:

That was a disaster, considering his replacement.

Share