Sep 292020
 

It’s a tired day, here in the CatBox.  I’m hoping to feel up to an Open Thread tomorrow.  Tuesday is Flush your Republicans Day.  Put them on the first floor of a two floor outhouse, or make like the dawg (see below).

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:08 (average 5:51).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Cartoon:

Trump* Virus Update:

0929TrumpVirusMap

Click for interactive maps

US Cases: 7,365,427
US Deaths: 209,922
Plus all the GOP murders Republicans are hiding from us

Short Takes:

From YouTube (Robert Reich Channel): Trump Tax Returns: 10 Things You Need to Know

 

Of course the Reich on the Left, Robert Reich, is right. All ten are spot-on! The Reich on the Right, the Republican Reich, could not have picked a Fuhrer more representative of who they are!  RESIST!!

From YouTube (CNN Channel): Could Trump go to jail over his taxes? Watergate prosecutor weighs in

 

This is why Trump* is so desperate to steal the White House again. It’s his only chance avoid spending the rest of his life in prison.  RESIST!!

From YouTube (a blast from the past): Queen – Bohemian Rhapsody (Official Video Remastered)

 

Ah… the memories! Protest like the 60s!  RESIST!!

Vote Blue No Matter Who Top to Bottom!!

Share
Sep 292020
 

On 22 October 2019, TomCat wrote an article entitled “Who Won the Election . . . Eh?” about the results of the 19 October 2019 Canadian federal election.  It must have been a slow news day!  In the article, he claimed:

“Fortunately, we have an expert here at the site to flesh out my report.  For starters, I’d like our resident Sasquatch to explain the ‘Speech from the Throne’ to us.”

Well I am not an expert, but I am a proud Canuck (Canadian) who has studied Canadian history as well as American history.  So, I am going to give you a bit of a Canadian history and civics lesson, heavy on the civics.

The first settlements in what is now Canada were Viking settlements in Newfoundland and Labrador (Newfoundland is the island, affectionately called The Rock by locals, and Labrador is on the mainland but they together make up the 10th Canadian province) as well as in the Canadian Arctic around 1,000 CE, so settlement predates Columbus by almost 500 years.  These Vikings first expanded to Iceland then Greenland and their expansion into Canada was the culmination of their westward journey for land and riches.  The first name for what is now part of Canada was Vinland (pronounced Winland).  Evidence of these settlements has been found at L’Anse Aux Meadows, Newfoundland.

Canada’s First English Settlement, Cupers Cove, now Cupids, Nfld was established by John Guy in 1610 under a royal charter from James I. It was England’s first attempt at organised colonization in Canada and the second plantation in North America. Jamestown, Virginia was the first in 1607.

Jacques Cartier was the first European to describe and map the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the shores of the Saint Lawrence River, which he called “The Country of Canadas “, after the Iroquois names for the two big settlements he saw at Stadacona (Quebec City) and at Hochelaga (Montréal).

With two countries, England and France, fighting the 7 Years War in Europe, it was only logical that they brought the war to the New World where they both had interests.  The British under General James Wolfe soundly beat General Louis-Joseph Montcalm, Marquis de Montcalm of France and so, Canada became English territory.

It is interesting to note that Canada and the United States are both children of the same European country, England.  But as siblings, we were quite different and remain so today. The Americans of the Thirteen Colonies chose to revolt against the British proclaiming no taxation without representation and subsequently defeated the British in the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783) with the assistance of France.  As we know, the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776 signalling the independence from Britain.  The English colonies in Canada never went to war against Britain in order to win their independence.  Canada petitioned Britain for independence in 1867 which was granted.  On 01 July 1867, under the British North America Act, Canada became the Dominion of Canada.  At this point, Canada still relied on the English Constitution (Magna Carta) but slowly we wrote our own Constitution. Interestingly, it was the father of our current Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau, who repatriated the constitution in 1982 when he was Prime Minister.  In my opinion, the true characters of our two countries are shown in how we chose to cut our mother’s apron strings.

Canada

 

United States

Queen Elizabeth II

Head of State

President

Governor General – Vice Regal (the Queen’s representative in Canada)

Executive

 

Bicameral – based on Westminster Parliamentary System of Britain; elected House of Commons 338 total seats; appointed Senate 105 seats

Legislature

Bicameral – elected House of Representatives 435 seats; elected Senate 100 seats

Liberal (centre left) Conservative (right) New Democratic Party (left – social democrat) Green Party; Bloc Québécois (Québec only)

Political Parties

Democratic Party (centre left & progressive) Republican Party (conservative, alt right) With other parties from time to time such as the Libertarians and the Green

Supreme Court of Canada

Judicial

SCOTUS

From this, you might wonder where the Canadian Prime Minister is situated.  The PM is the head of one of the political parties in the legislative body or House of Commons. The term Prime Minister means the first or prime minister to the Crown.  After the 2015 election, the Liberal party had a majority with 184 seats but today is a minority having fallen short of the 170 seats needed for a majority.  The Liberals still had more seats than any other party with 157 seats, so they negotiated with the NDP and the Bloc Québécois to support a Liberal government.  As such, the Liberal party formed a minority government.  No other party would align itself with the Conservative party to throw the win to them, although there was speculation at the time.  There are 338 seats in the Canadian parliament.  Justin Trudeau became the leader of the Liberal party in 2013 and has been the Prime Minister since 2015.  To be PM, Trudeau also must be a seated Member of Parliament and was elected in the Papineau riding in greater Montréal.  The PM must represent his riding but also must represent all the people of Canada. To my American friends, do you think Trump could have done this?  In my opinion, Trudeau does better than Trump by far and he does more than Trump even including Trump’s golf time!  Also note that the Prime Minister is directly elected by some of the people (his constituency) and those in the Liberal Party who voted to make him leader of the party.

Electoral districts or ridings in Canada are established by Elections Canada, a non-partisan agency.  Unlike in the US where electoral districts are established by the individual states and therefore controlled by the political party in power at the time the boundaries are established, political parties in Canada are not involved at all.  Canada does not have the gerrymandering issues very evident in the US.

Prorogation is the action of discontinuing a session of a parliament or other legislative assembly without dissolving it.  When an election writ is dropped, Parliament is dissolved.  We also have recesses for Christmas or annual vacations.  Prorogation is not unlike a recess in the US.

From Huffington Post 

“And on Tuesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced he asked Gov. Gen. Julie Payette to prorogue Parliament until Sept. 23, when a throne speech will be delivered and, in short order, a confidence vote will be held. 

Prorogation is a tricky subject in Canadian politics. It’s been called a natural part of the political process, while also criticized in recent years as something mobilized by PMs to get out of tough situations.  …

A parliamentary “reset” — and the new throne speech that comes with it — could also spell danger for the Trudeau government, as a vote of no-confidence on the plan could trigger an election.  …

Trudeau said that since the December throne speech that outlined his government’s agenda obviously made no mention of COVID-19 crisis that would disrupt the world months later, a new plan for a “stronger, more resilient Canada″ was in order.”

In this case, the WE Charity scandal which involved the Finance Minister and relatives of the PM, in addition to the changing financial position of the country and the COVID-19 pandemic are the prime reasons for the prorogation.  Any investigations into WE were halted, and the Finance Minister stepped down.  It is interesting to note that in 2015, PM Trudeau spoke of Stephen Harper’s prorogation of Parliament in 2007, 2008 and 2010 and said the Liberals would never do that.  Short memories! In 2008, the prorogation of Parliament was strictly a political move by Harper (Conservative) to out-maneuver the opposition and should not have happened.

The Prime Minister asked the Governor General to prorogue Parliament on 18/08/2020 until 23/09/2020 when Parliament would resume with a Speech from the Throne.  The Speech from the Throne, a very formal affair conducted alternately in French and English in the Senate Chamber, is used to open the first sitting of Parliament after an election or to restart a sitting after prorogation.  The Speech is always read by the Governor General but is prepared by the Prime Minister and his office.  You might remember from the news that HRM Queen Elizabeth II prorogued the British Parliament on 28/08/2019 at the request of PM Boris Johnson. Effective from 10/09/2019  until the State Opening of Parliament on 14/10/2019, the prorogation was cut short because of political opposition.  As I recall, Johnson wanted prorogation in regards to limiting debate over the issue of leaving the European Union.

Gov. Gen. Julie Payette, middle, stands with Chief of Defence Staff Jonathan Vance, left to right, Prime...
From left to right, Chief of Defence Staff Jonathan Vance, PM Justin Trudeau, Governor
General Julie Payette, Senator Marc Gold and RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki in the
Senate Chamber prior to the reading of the Speech from the Throne.

Speech from the Throne — The Speech from the Throne, whether it follows an election or prorogation, is a statement of the government’s priorities, essentially a roadmap of what the government hopes to accomplish during this session of Parliament.  After the October 2019 election, the PM was faced with bringing a plan together which a majority of Members of Parliament (MPs) would support.  Talk about “Let’s Make a Deal”!  Trudeau was able to negotiate with the NDP and the Bloc Québécois to support that plan.  Had he not been successful obtaining support, Andrew Scheer, leader of the Conservative Party at the time, would have been asked by the Governor General to form the government.  The Conservatives had fewer seats than the Liberals so they would have to have received the support of the NDP and the Bloc Québécois, neither of which would even think of that.  Had neither the Liberals nor the Conservatives been able to form a government, the only alternative is a new election.

Rather than going through the 2019 Speech from the Throne, which is obsolete now except as history, I’ll show the highlights of the 2020 Speech from the Throne that came out on 23/09/2020. It is interesting to note that Jagmeet Singh, leader of the NDP, was able to get some changes to the roadmap in exchange for NDP support.  Had Trudeau not been successful in gaining NDP support, Trudeau would have presented the Liberal plan and it would be voted upon.  If the vote failed, which it almost certainly would have, that would be a vote of non confidence.  The government would fall and Canada would be having a federal election.  We are not having an election.

As a small dig to my American friends, election campaigns in Canada must be, according to the Elections Act, a minimum of 36 days and a maximum of 50 days.  It sure beats the American system of 2 years, or in the case of presidential elections with Trump, 4 years of campaigning.  There is little chance of getting bored with election talk.

Another difference between Canada and the US is the amount that political parties can spend. The amount that a political party and its candidates can spend is limited by a formula of approximately one dollar for every eligible voter in Canada.  If an election were to be called now, it is estimated that each party could spend approximately $25 million.  I am not saying this is a small amount, but when compared to US election spending, it is a pittance.

Yet another difference, Canada can dispose of its government with a non confidence vote.  Of course, that means an election, but it would also be a way to dump Trump, all other factors being met.  It beats 4 years of buyers’ remorse!

In these COVID times, if you see Parliament in session you will notice that everyone is sporting masks which does not seem to happen in the US Congress to the same degree.  Social distancing is maintained as much as possible as well.

Highlights of the Speech from the Throne 23 September 2020

     1.  PROTECTING CANADIANS FROM COVID-19

Vaccine efforts; PPE production.

     2. HELPING CANADIANS THROUGH THE PANDEMIC

Creating jobs; Financial supports (CERB – Canada Emergency Relief Benefit) and Employment Insurance benefits;

From Huffington Post:

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh had been calling on the government to extend the CERB until the benefit could be replaced by something paying the same level of support. CERB has paid $2,000 for a four-week period, up to 28 weeks, to eligible Canadians.”

Women in the economy;

From Huffington Post:

The government is promising an action plan for women in the economy, led by a task force of diverse experts, to ensure the pandemic’s legacy is not “one of rolling back the clock on women’s participation in the workforce.”

Supporting business; From Huffington Post: The Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy 

Fiscal sustainability.

    3.   BUILDING BACK BETTER — A RESILIENCY AGENDA FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS

Addressing gaps in our social systems; a stronger workforce; Taking action on extreme risks from climate change.

   4.   THE CANADA WE’RE FIGHTING FOR

Reconciliation with Indigenous communities; Addressing systemic racism; Protecting two official languages; A welcoming Canada (Immigration); Canada in the world.

I cannot go into the detail required on each category in the Speech here, however I have included an English version pdf below put out by the government.

The Speech from the Throne  pdf

 

Image result for beaver images

I know that Nameless likes our national anthem so I have included it here for him.  We only sing the first verse and chorus but there are 3 more verses.  Enjoy Nameless!

O Canada!
Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all thy sons command.
With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!
From far and wide, O Canada,
We stand on guard for thee.

[Chorus]
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

O Canada!
Where pines and maples grow,
Great prairies spread, and lordly
 rivers flow.
How dear to us thy broad domain,
From east to western sea.
The land of hope for all who toil,
The true north strong and free!

[Chorus]

O Canada!
Beneath our shining skies,
May stalwart sons, and gentle maidens rise.
To keep thee steadfast through the years,
From east to western sea,
Our own beloved native land,
Our true north strong and free!

[Chorus]

Ruler Supreme!
Who hearest humble prayer,
Hold thy dominion in thy loving care.
Help us to find, Oh God, in thee,
A lasting rich reward.
As waiting for the better day,
We ever stand on guard!

[Chorus]

 

Share
Sep 282020
 


American Bridge – With all the attention on taxes, I’m glad someone remembers the Court.

Don Winslow – Good take on taxes

Really American – It would be news to the Brits if we were actually speaking English, as opposed to American “English.”

The Lincoln Project has a Spanish-language ad up on CoViD-19 here.

Beau is dripping with irony in this one, and it’s very funny – or would be if it weren’t such a serious issue.

Supreme Court petitions – we are now getting the ones whoch name the nominee.

Stop Republicans
Fight for Reform

Share
Sep 282020
 

It’s a crazy cay here in the CatBox.  WWWendy just took me to get my Trump* virus test.  I’m sure I don’t have it, but if I do, I leave my mortal remains, after they rot a bit, to criminal Fuhrer Trump*.  He can mix them with his hamberders and Clorox.  This is my only article today  Diana is due shortly.  What I do tomorrow will depend on how I feel.  Oh God!  It’s Monday!

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:10 (average 4:44).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Cartoon:

Trump* Virus Update:

0928TrumpVirusMap

Click for interactive maps and charts

Religious Agony:

0927Broncos10-Buccaneers28

That Damn Orb has abandoned me!

Short Take:

From YouTube (a blast from the past): Kansas – Carry On Wayward Son (Official Audio)

 

Ah… the memories! Protest like the 60s!  RESIST!!

Vote Blue No Matter Who Top to Bottom!!

Share

Video Thread 9/27/2020

 Posted by at 3:07 pm  Politics
Sep 272020
 


Slow video day

Here’s a Roy Zimmerman (CC built in)

Color of Change PSA

This is a party that Beau seems to me to be a little bit late to, but now he’s here, he’s clear and firm.

Continuation of the previous video, with fury

New SCOTUS petitions

Faithful America
Stop Republicans dot org
Daily Kos (their third, each a little different)
Demand Progress (either new or re-written since the nomination)
Fight for Equality

Share
Sep 272020
 

It’s a very busy WWWendy day here in the CatBox.  This is my only article today.  Tomorrow I have my Trump* virus test, and Diana should be here slightly after I get home, so please expect no more than a Personal Update tomorrow.  This Sunday, may the Lord keep Resident Donald Trump*… from destroying the country before we can put him in a cell.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:10 (average 4:35).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Cartoon:

Trump* Virus Update:

0927TrumpVirusMap

Click for interactive maps and charts

US Cases: 7,290,347
US Deaths: 209,208
Plus all the Trump* virus murders Republicans are hiding from us

Short Takes:

From Crooks and Liars: A hair-raising article in Bellingcat details what has been learned from chat logs of the Patriot Coalition of Oregon, thanks to an Antifa infiltrator. Journalists Robert Evans and Jason Wilson describe the group as part of a growing network “increasingly organizing around direct physical confrontations with leftist protesters in Portland and other American cities.”

The leaked chat logs appear to reveal that some members of the Patriot Coalition have taken part in multiple violent rallies throughout the summer, and that they claim to have operated a series of vigilante patrols and checkpoints during the Oregon wildfires. While the chats appear to show they work and fight alongside members of extremist groups like the Proud Boys, American Wolf and 1776 2.0, the Patriot Coalition seems to have no coherent ideology beyond a desire to violently confront leftists in the name of the police and President Trump. A user identified as Paige summed up the general feelings of the group in a post made ahead of a what turned out to be a bloody ‘Back the Blue’ rally on August 22nd in Portland when she wrote: “I’m waiting for the presidential go to start open firing.”

Patriot Coalition members regularly declare Democratic politicians to be “Antifa” and thus fair targets for violence.

Discussions of violence in the Patriot Coalition group chat are not hypothetical. While some individuals are likely grandstanding, the chat logs show members gearing up for a number of events where very real violence occurred.

On August 22nd more than 300 heavily armed right-wing demonstrators rallied in downtown Portland for what was, nominally, a rally supporting the police. Yet the situation quickly degenerated into a mass brawl, with numerous injuries (including to one of the authors of this article).

Those events reflected the plans that Patriot Coalition had made. In the lead up, members discussed acquiring paintball guns and freezing their ammunition for maximum damage.

One of the many, many horrifying comments obtained from the group reads, “The only real way to end it is start shooting everyone of them. Fists and pepper spray are fun but don’t get the job done. I think sooner or later it’s coming. Our governor and the coward mayor of Portland will let it go on till November. If we don’t take care of it ourselves. Then there’s the whole prison thing I don’t quite like. So your damned if do damned if you don’t.”

Click through. The rest is too important to miss. What these Republican terrorists are doing in my town today, they shall do in your town tomorrow.  RESIST!!

From YouTube (Elizabeth Warren Channel): Elizabeth Warren Responds to Donald Trump’s Supreme Court Pick

Liz could not be more spot-on. Every Republican in power is one Republican too many!  RESIST!!

From YouTube (a blast from the past): Lynyrd Skynyrd – Sweet Home Alabama

Ah… the memories! Protest like the 60s! RESIST!!

Vote Blue No Matter Who Top to Bottom!!

Share

Video Thread 9/26/2020

 Posted by at 3:29 pm  Politics
Sep 262020
 


Don Winslow – I surely hope YouTube doesn’t take down this one.

Really American – Transfer of Power

The Lincoln Project

Beau made the BEFORE the Breonna Taylor grand jury results were released – AND THAT’S THE POINT. Let.s not forget.

Beau made this AFTER the Taylor grand jury results were released and reacted to, and is a nice little history lesson.

Share

Everyday Erinyes #233

 Posted by at 1:06 pm  Politics
Sep 262020
 

Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”

I considered addressing redlining this week – though technically illegal, it is still very much with us – but I decided since I doubt tha anyone who reads here buys and sells a lot of properties, whereas we all encounter microaggressions and may even have been guilty of then, it would be a more current topic.
================================================================

Microaggressions aren’t just innocent blunders – new research links them with racial bias

They’re not just honest or ignorant mistakes, and they can poison an otherwise pleasant interaction.
Hinterhaus Productions/DigitalVision via Getty Images

Jonathan Kanter, University of Washington

A white man shares publicly that a group of Black Harvard graduates “look like gang members to me” and claims he would have said the same of white people dressed similarly. A white physician mistakes a Black physician for a janitor and says it was an honest mistake. A white woman asks to touch a Black classmate’s hair, is scolded for doing so and sulks, “I was just curious.”

It’s a pattern that recurs countless times, in myriad interactions and contexts, across American society. A white person says something that is experienced as racially biased, is called on it and reacts defensively.

These comments and other such subtle snubs, insults and offenses are known as microaggressions. The concept, introduced in the 1970s by Black psychiatrist Chester Pierce, is now the focus of a fierce debate.

young Black woman with her hand up
Most research has focused on the harms done to those on the receiving end of microaggressions.
SDI Productions/E+ via Getty Images

On one side, Black people and a host of others representing multiple diverse communities stand with a wealth of testimonials, lists of different types of microaggressions and compelling scientific evidence documenting how these experiences harm recipients.

Some white people are on board, working to understand, change and join as allies. Still, a cacophony of white voices exists in the public discourse, dismissive, defensive and influential. Their main argument: Microaggressions are innocuous and innocent, not associated with racism at all. Many contend that those who complain about microaggressions are manipulating victimhood and being too sensitive.

Linking bias to microaggressions

Until recently, the majority of research on microaggressions has focused on asking people targeted by microaggressions about their experiences and perspectives, rather than researching the offenders. This previous research is crucial. But with respect to understanding white defensiveness and underlying racial bias, it’s akin to researching why baseball pitchers keep hitting batters with pitches by only interviewing batters about how it feels to get hit.

My colleagues and I – a team of Black, white (myself included) and other psychological scientists and students – went directly to the “pitchers” to untangle the relationship between these expressions and racial bias.

We asked white college students – one group at a university in the Northwest, another at a campus in the southern Midwest – how likely they are to commit 94 commonly described microaggressions that we identified from research publications and Black students we interviewed. For example, you are meeting a Black woman with braids; how likely are you to ask, “Can I touch your hair?”

We also asked our participants to describe their own racial bias using well-known measures. Then, we asked some participants to come to our laboratory to talk about current events with others. Lab observers rated how many explicitly racially biased statements they made in their interactions.

We found direct support for what recipients of microaggressions have been saying all along: Students who are more likely to say they commit microaggressions are more likely to score higher on measures of racial bias. One’s likelihood of microaggressing also predicts how racist one is judged to be by lab observers, as they watch real interactions unfold. We’re currently analyzing the same kind of data from a national sample of adults, and the results look similar.

With some microaggressions, like “Can I touch your hair?,” the influence of racial bias is real but small. When the white woman who asked to touch the Black woman’s hair responds, “I was just curious,” she’s not necessarily lying about her conscious intentions. She likely is unaware of the subtle racial bias that also influences her behavior. One can demonstrate racial bias and curiosity at the same time.

Even small doses of prejudice, especially when they are confusing or ambiguous, are documented to be psychologically harmful for recipients. Our research suggests that some microaggressions, such as asking “Where are you from?” or staying silent during a debate about racism, may be understood as small doses of racial bias, contaminating otherwise good intentions.

In our studies, other kinds of microaggressions, including those that explicitly deny racism, are strongly and explicitly related to white participants’ self-reported levels of racial bias. For instance, the more racial bias a participant says they have, the more likely they are to say, “All lives matter, not just Black lives.” These expressions are more than small doses of toxin. Still, even in these cases, racial bias does not explain all of it, leaving ample room for defensiveness and claims that the recipient is being too sensitive.

In our research, participants who agreed with the statement “A lot of minorities are too sensitive these days” showed some of the highest levels of racial bias.

Addressing microaggressions in context

Amidst chronic and widespread racial injustices, including segregated neighborhoods, disparities in health care outcomes, systemic police bias and rising white supremacist violence, a chorus of Black and other voices also have been expressing pain and anger about the stream of subtle microaggressions they endure as part of daily life in the United States.

Black woman smiles in conversation with women of other races
Those on the receiving end of microaggresions want perpetrators to acknowledge the problem.
Thomas Barwick/DigitalVision via Getty Images

Consistent with our research, they generally are not insisting that offenders admit to being card-carrying racists. They are asking offenders, despite their conscious intentions, to understand and acknowledge the impacts of their behavior. They are asking for understanding that those offended are not imagining things or just being too sensitive. Mostly, they are asking offenders to improve their awareness, stop engaging in behaviors that create and perpetuate race-based harm themselves and join in fighting against the rest of it.

As a clinical psychologist, I know that, even in the best of circumstances, true self-awareness and behavior change are hard work.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]

U.S. society provides far from the best of circumstances. At the nation’s birth, people found a way to celebrate democracy, freedom and equality while owning slaves and destroying Indigenous populations, and then found ways to erase many of these horrors from the nation’s collective memory. Yet, as James Baldwin said of this history, “We carry it within us, are unconsciously controlled by it in many ways, and history is literally present in all that we do.”

Science provides validation of the problem of microaggressions: They are real, harmful and associated with racial bias, whether the perpetrator is aware of it or not. Improving awareness of this bias is hard but important work. If Americans want to advance toward a more racially just society, identifying effective ways to reduce microaggressions will be necessary, and this research is just beginning.The Conversation

Jonathan Kanter, Director of the Center for the Science of Social Connection, University of Washington

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

================================================================
Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone, Mr. Kanter says, “even in the best of circumstances, true self-awareness and behavior change are hard work.” That may even be an understatement. My own suspicion is that the worst offenders at microaggression are those in deep, deep denial of white privilege – and they are the last ones to want to change. No work is as hard as that work one doesn’t want to do. Please help us in any way you can, ladies, to get through to those who don’t want to.

The Furies and I will be back.

Share