Win America Back PAC – Ouch. (If this doesn”t hit you between the eyes, check your pulse. Seriously. This could be our “Daisy” ad.)
PARTIAL TRANSCRIPTION !!!! Kind of a SPOILER, but needed because the CC gives out when Grandpa takes off his glasses because of the overlap (it gets one phrase and gives up.) What heis hearing in that eternal few seconds is Trump’s voice, in overlapping quotes: “I will totally accept the Results of the election if I win” “Stand back and stand by” “very fine people on both sides” “three or four” “We may have to go for an extra term” with sirens in the background. (Then after the girl’s second question, there is just silence)
Just so you know, this is not an ad but a Fox News clip. Seriously.
Don Winslow – talking about Pennsylvania, but equally applicable to other states with simiar economies (and I’d bet good money that THIS Don has Bruce’s permisson, even blessing.) Some find it needs a hanky warning.
Meidas Touch just releaseed three (four if you count the Spanish version of one of them as a seperate video). I managed to pick one.
Really American
Sound and Fury for the Democratic Coalition posted two, both veery good.
Keith had four short ones today – I’d posted them all in order, but he took the three shorter ones down (they were shorter versions of parts of the long one anyway), so I took them down also.
Brayden — you have heart, courage, and maturity beyond your years. You have unlimited potential — and I can’t wait to see what your future holds. pic.twitter.com/7t2mHOXNMa
The Lincoln Project has two (it must be close to the election. Well, my ballot is in the mail today because yesterday was a federal holiday.)
Robert Reich – From his studio, or wherever he creates, to God’s screen. I’m not picky about how we do it (except that our methods should hild up legally), but we must do something – if we win – and this is why this election is so important!
And I’m even saving a couple, hoping for a slower day. But I can’t leave Keith out.
Lincoln Project – No CC – Transcript does not include sarcasm, so feel free to supply your own.
Thank you, Mr. President, for taking off the mask. Thank you for threatening America with violence when you lose, [and?] that only yout votes are counted. And for trying to rig this election and intimidate voters. For embracing the tactics of the tyrants you admire, and trying to use those tactics against the American people. Thank you for showing the American people exactly who and what you are. Because we’re perfectyly aware that you aren’t joking and you aren’t trolling any more. The future you and your pet Senators want is just as [unintelligible] as yours, but your time is running out. Your legacy and your place in history awaits – a legacy of failing – a blight on our history. Defeat is coming. Accountability is coming. We are coming.
Kamala Harris opening statement at Barrett hearing (actually starts at 0:42 and goes to 10:49). A little echo-ey, but there is CC.
You can pretty consistently count on Amy Klobuchar to give it straight.
Now This News – The flannel moth caterpillar is finally going viral (no CC because no sound). If you actually see one of these, don’t touch it – their defense mechanism is a chemical which causes skin irritation.
Glad Beau is addressing this, though it’s only one form of topsy-turvydom which is modern Republicanism. I would say, instead of “the Constitution failed,” I would say “we failed our Constitution” when imbalance happens … as it has and will again.
Experts in autocracies have pointed out that it is, unfortunately, easy to slip into normalizing the tyrant, hence it is important to hang on to outrage. These incidents which seem to call for the efforts of the Greek Furies (Erinyes) to come and deal with them will, I hope, help with that. As a reminder, though no one really knows how many there were supposed to be, the three names we have are Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone. These roughly translate as “unceasing,” “grudging,” and “vengeful destruction.”
I served in the military from 1966-1976, and it never crossed my mind there was white nationalism there. Racism, yes, bigotry, yes. misogyny, OMG yes. But on personal levels. The thought of white supremacy as a political philosophy … well, maybe we were still too close then to having fought and defeated Nazis to consider it. And then, I was never in combat. In other words, my experience doesn’t mean it wasn’t there then – and it certainly doesn’t mean it isn’t there now.
================================================================
Americans aren’t worried about white nationalism in the military – because they don’t know it’s there
In their effort to create an all-white country where nonwhites do not have civil rights protections, these groups often instigate violent confrontations that target racial and religious minorities. Since 2018, white supremacists have conducted more lethal attacks in the United States than any other domestic extremist movement.
While many Americans were appalled at the president’s statement, our research shows that most Americans remain unaware of the connections these groups have to the military.
Researchers do not have reliable data on how many active duty or veteran service members belong to white nationalist groups. But current military members are increasingly aware of the influence of far-right groups in the ranks.
In the most recent poll by Military Times, an independent media organization covering the military, about one-fifth of service members have reported seeing signs of white nationalism or racist ideology in the military community. Those include the casual use of racial slurs and anti-Semitic language, and even explosives deliberately arranged in the shape of a swastika.
More than one-third of service members surveyed in 2018 said white nationalism is a significant threat to the country – which is more than were seriously concerned about threats from Syria, Afghanistan or immigration.
Lawmakers have been paying attention to the problem. In 2019, the House of Representatives approved a requirement to screen potential military enlistees for signs of white nationalism, as part of the Pentagon’s annual budget allocation. But the Senate removed that provision before sending the bill to the White House for the president’s signature.
If Congress did ban white nationalists from serving in the military, members of white nationalist groups would have a harder time receiving military training. They would also be cut off from an important recruitmentnetwork.
First, we asked respondents how prevalent they thought white nationalism was in the military. Most – 70% – said there were “some” white nationalists on active duty. Another 20% said there were “many.” Just 10% thought there were none.
Then we sought to find out whether people thought it was a problem. To answer that question, we split our respondents into two groups. We asked one half of them whether “white nationalism in the military” is “not a problem,” a “somewhat serious problem” or a “serious problem.” Only 30% of them thought it was a “serious” problem; 47% percent thought it was “somewhat serious” and 23% thought it was “not a problem.”
The other half of the respondents got the same question – but before we asked, we gave them the results of a 2018 Military Times poll finding that “22% of service members … have seen evidence of white nationalism or racist ideology within the armed forces.” Having learned that information, 35% of this group said the problem is “serious” – a statistically significant increase of five percentage points.
After that, we returned to the first group, and gave them the information from the Military Times poll – and found that 39% of them considered the problem “serious.” This nine-point increase was also statistically significant.
We did see an initial political divide among our respondents. People who identified as strong conservatives were less concerned about white nationalism in the military than were strong liberals. But respondents across the political spectrum were willing to update their views, and considered white nationalism a serious problem, once we gave them additional, factual information.
Our work suggests that informing the public about service members’ worries about white nationalism in the military could increase concern among both liberals and conservatives about the growing power of these groups. Increased public concern could create an incentive for policymakers to try to combat white nationalist groups, in the military and in society at large.
================================================================
AMT, I absolutely am “concerned” about this. In fact, that is throwing roses at it. (I also find it telling that the Democratic House in 2019 attempted to address this and was overruled by the Republican Senate.) I can see why white supremacists would want to join the military … but those motivations would also be the main reason sane Americans who support the Constitution would NOT want them to be there. I’d say this is something Congress needs to revisit as soon as it is able to pass appropriate legislation.