Oct 292020
 

So close to the November 3 election, Americans might like to know what other nations think of another four years of Trump. The following article is one taken from 9 clips in The Briefing, a weekly background letter (e-mail) written by Darren McCaffrey, Euronews Political Editor with an overview of the most important European news across the continent that week.

For Europe, does it matter who wins the US election next week?

If it was up to Europe, Joe Biden would win next week’s US Presidential election, and win big.

Earlier this month, the polling company YouGov surveyed seven European countries – Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Denmark and Sweden – and found that over 60 per cent of people in all but one country wanted to see Joe Biden triumph over Donald Trump. Even in Italy, where support was highest for the incumbent, only 20 per cent backed Trump.

Clearly, this is not Europe’s election and we have no say in the final result but whoever wins will have a big impact on our politics for years to come.

For most of the post-World War II era, the United States, while not necessarily agreeing with its Western European allies on every issue, has shown commitment to our continent. This arrangement may have been mutually beneficial but it has also helped Europe prosper, bringing the Marshall plan, security from NATO and political unity, as well as support for the EU project.

Four years of Donald J Trump have proved, however, to be a cold, hard slap in the face for much of Europe. The predictability of the past 75 years has been challenged and replaced by mounting uncertainty. Assumed US support for the Iran deal, the Paris climate agreement and NATO simply haven’t been there. An understanding that the world operates on a set of principles and rules, enforced by the US, has been cast in doubt. Even the existence of the European Union as we know it has been questioned and undermined.

There is little doubt that Biden as president will restore a more familiar state of affairs but Europe’s relationship with the United States is unlikely to ever be the same again.

The Atlantic is getting bigger, America is changing, pivoting away from us and towards a big, more complex Asia-Pacific. The United States has always been a bi-oceanic nation but for most of our lifetimes, the trans-Atlantic relationship has dominated its view on the world. This is no longer the case. This pivot did not start with Donald Trump and rather dates back several presidents, accelerating under Barack Obama.

For Washington in the 20th century, Europe was the crux of international affairs, with its strategic rival Russia. In the 21st century, Asia and, more importantly, China are assuming this position.

Changes at home are powering this too. America is becoming more diverse; the number of white, Protestant Anglo Saxons with European heritage is decreasing. They are being replaced by growing numbers of people with Hispanic, African-American and Asian heritage whose view of the world has Europe on the periphery.

This huge, geopolitical dance should be an opportunity for Europe to define and assert its own, united foreign policy position. But for the time being, that seems to be more of an aspiration than a reality, simply because leaders often cannot agree. A point that was proved by the farce last month when the UK and Canada imposed sanctions on Belarus before the EU could because of other internal battles over Turkey. Surely, unanimity is no longer fit for purpose?

Over the past four years, Europe has had a wake-up call concerning what the future might hold. It cannot simply rely on the United States – a US that is prepared for trade wars, a more inward-looking nation, a country that might view the EU itself as a threat rather than a partner.

This means Europe standing on its own two feet, but that spells change. A Biden presidency might feel reassuringly familiar but we shouldn’t become complacent. The European Union needs to take decisive action now if it is to become the major global player it clearly wants to be.

Share

  6 Responses to “Europe and the US election”

  1. I cringe at even the thought of a trump win in the WH for another 4 years.
    Makes me ill just thinking about it. 

    I miss the good ole days where one could wake up, look at politics, and be comforted knowing we have a caring president, and also to have a good feeling about who we are, and the positive world view(s) of us. 

    I fervently pray every day, that the Dems win this election, with Joe as POTUS. 

    Thank you, Lona for your great post. 

  2. It is sad that Dumpy has had such a negative impact on Europe, but, then, he destroys virtually anything he touches.  The U.S.’s pivot towards Asia does seem to make sense, but would not appear so definitive had Dumpy not been so sickly isolationist.  I’m not convinced that he meant to be isolationist, he probably can’t even spell the word.  I think he’s just been so focused on the “deplorable” who can only think of their presumed “deserved” place at the top of the U.S.’s feeding chain.  without these bigots he’d never have hd a path to POTUS.
    Still, over the long haul, nothing remains static.  Change is!

  3. I fully agree that the EU needs to play a larger role on the world stage and shoulder a larger share of the cost of shouldering the world’s burdens.  That said, I could not feel more disgusted that the Republican Reich, starting long before Trump*, have made the US an international pariah.   I wish to God we had European election monitors to supervise our election!  10

  4. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. I do think that the EU needs to take things on. But I also think the US (and the EU itself) would be well advised to look at Greece in particular – and in particular at its addressing of the problem of Golden Dawn. It isn’t the American people as a whole, nor is it the people of Europe as a whole, who are holding us back. It is the pathetic, terrified, violent right-wing extremists everywhere who are doing that Identifying their crimes as crimes and locking some of them up is not going to end their existence. But it can’t hurt.

  5. Some European locations are WAY ahead of where we Americans should be.

    More in tomorrow’s post.

    (How’s that for a teaser?)

  6. Thanks Lona. Some changes may be appropriate as the US, and all the colonizing countries, take responsibility for the harms many of those countries still endure as a result of policies derived from that history of being treated as less than.  I also wonder whether Nagorno-Karabakh would be happening absent Trump’s alterations of US foreign policy.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.