Why Spend $110 Billion?

 Posted by at 6:34 am  Politics
Mar 062011
 

All over the middle east people are rising up and demanding democracy.  It is good that the United States is giving that movement verbal support.  However, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever that, at the same time, the US is spending over $110 billion per year preventing the same movement from taking root in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as this Thomas Friedman editorial shows.

6AfPakWhen one looks across the Arab world today at the stunning spontaneous democracy uprisings, it is impossible to not ask: What are we doing spending $110 billion this year supporting corrupt and unpopular regimes in Afghanistan and Pakistan that are almost identical to the governments we’re applauding the Arab people for overthrowing?

Ever since 9/11, the West has hoped for a war of ideas within the Muslim world that would feature an internal challenge to the violent radical Islamic ideology of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. That contest, though, never really materialized because the regimes we counted on to promote it found violent Muslim extremism a convenient foil, so they allowed it to persist. Moreover, these corrupt, crony capitalist Arab regimes were hardly the ideal carriers for an alternative to bin Ladenism. To the contrary, it was their abusive behavior and vicious suffocation of any kind of independent moderate centrist parties that fueled the extremism even more.

Now the people themselves have taken down those regimes in Egypt and Tunisia, and they’re rattling the ones in Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, Oman and Iran. They are not doing it for us, or to answer bin Laden. They are doing it by themselves for themselves — because they want their freedom and to control their own destinies. But in doing so they have created a hugely powerful, modernizing challenge to bin Ladenism, which is why Al Qaeda today is tongue-tied. It’s a beautiful thing to watch.

Al Qaeda’s answer to modern-day autocracy was its version of the seventh-century Caliphate. But the people — from Tunisia to Yemen — have come up with their own answer to violent extremism and the abusive regimes we’ve been propping up. It’s called democracy. They have a long way to go to lock it in. It may yet be hijacked by religious forces. But, for now, it is clear that the majority wants to build a future in the 21st century, not the seventh.

In other words, the Arab peoples have done for free, on their own and for their own reasons, everything that we were paying their regimes to do in the “war on terrorism” but they never did.

And that brings me back to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Last October, Transparency International rated the regime of President Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan as the second most corrupt in the world after Somalia’s. That is the Afghan regime we will spend more than $110 billion in 2011 to support.

And tell me that Pakistan’s intelligence service, ISI, which dominates Pakistani politics, isn’t the twin of Hosni Mubarak’s security service. Pakistan’s military leaders play the same game Mubarak played with us for years. First, they whisper in our ears: “Psst, without us, the radical Islamists will rule. So we may not be perfect, but we’re the only thing standing in the way of the devil.” In reality, though, they are nurturing the devil. The ISI is long alleged to have been fostering anti-Indian radical Muslim groups and masterminding the Afghan Taliban… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

If anything, Pakistan warrants more attention that Afghanistan, because there we have, largely to interference in their affairs during the Republican Regime under Bush, a highly unstable state in possession of nuclear arms.  The biggest threat to the US in the world today, other than the constant specter of takeover by Al Dubya, is that right-wing Muslim extremists will acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan.  I don’t see where US raids into Pakistani territory, killing more civilians than militants, is helping that situation.  On the other hand, if Afghanistan, democracy stands a far better chance of breaking out if we just get out troops out of the way, and let the people dispose of the corrupt Bush puppet, Karzai.

Share

  2 Responses to “Why Spend $110 Billion?”

  1. It just goes to show that we value stability over democracy, and as long as a government is stable and friendly to us, that’s all we care about. Constant hypocrisy and failur in our foreign policy!

    • Good point, Jack, but what about Pakistan? They are high unstable, ever since Musharraf murdered Bhutto, but we still prop them up.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.