Feb 162010
 

Here are the results of the ‘support Obama poll’:

Poll0215

And here are your comments:

From Jo on February 14, 2010 at 1:24 pm

 

Since I am a Canadian and not qualified to make a comment, I will say that since Obama is your President, you folks should support him on all issues, as long as he is your President. You voted for him, now he needs your support. Isn’t that how it is supposed to work? If you don’t like his issues, then you vote for someone else you can support.

I don’t like the man personally, I think he was all blunderbuss and no fire, and I think for the most part he has let you down, but while he is still in office, you folks need to support him. You guys hired him for the job.

 

From Oso on February 12, 2010 at 11:47 pm

 

Supporting Obama means supporting Wall Street’s financial policy,UHC’s health care policy and George Bush’s foreign policy. He can crawl up Lloyd Blankfein’s ass to make his next speech.

 

From Gwendolyn H. Barry on February 7, 2010 at 4:17 pm.  

 

Overall, TC, I still support my President… but I watch closely now. Ya know what I mean?

 

From Lisa G. on February 1, 2010 at 3:43 pm

 

I’m going with most issues. I don’t want to blindly say all issues without evaluating them first.

 

From chris williams in reply to Lisa G. on February 5, 2010 at 6:19 pm.

 

I think that most white people, want obama to fell. so they can blame it on the black man. his on party is his biggest problem. white people ganging up to protest a black man is not a new idea. only difference they dogs and clan members in white.

 

From Vigilante on February 1, 2010 at 10:02 am.

 

I find myself in easy agreement with BHO on most issues. But there are glaring exceptions: Afghanistan being a major one.

 

From Kevin on January 31, 2010 at 4:58 pm.  

 

I think that Obama needs the most support when faced with obstructionist actions undertaken by the GOP and their conservative misinformation machine. The Democrats lack an adequate structure to respond to the GOP garbage and will end up losing to the hordes of ignorant tea party sheep.

 

From Otis on January 30, 2010 at 11:06 pm.  

 

I think that the only way to truly evaluate any politician is on an issue by issue basis.

When I put this up, it was a trick question, intended to make a point.  In my opinion, a patriot supports whatever is the best policy for the country regardless of the source from which that policy arises.  The only way that this can be done is to base support on an issue by issue basis.

Overall, I find myself supporting more of Obama’s policies than I oppose.  Overall, I find myself opposing virtually all GOP policies.  I think most of us agree on that.  However, when we believe that Obama is wrong about an issue, isn’t it our patriotic duty to oppose him on that issue, even though we support him overall?

Kudos to Otis.  You nailed it, my friend.

Share
Feb 122010
 

Too much is enough, according to Nancy Pelosi.

filibuster_chart In an interview with Roll Call [sub req] Nancy Pelosi makes the case for using a "majority vote," or reconciliation, for getting healthcare reform done.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is pinning the blame on Republicans for a lack of bipartisanship in Congress and plans to bypass them if they continue to oppose efforts to enact near-universal health care.

"A constitutional majority is 51 votes," Pelosi said in an interview Tuesday with Roll Call. "If in fact the Republicans are going to say nothing can be done except by 60 percent, then maybe we all should be elected with 60 percent. It isn’t legitimate in terms of passing legislation."

….

"There is some unease when you talk about, well, what’s happening to the initiatives to help the American people?" Pelosi said. "Is there never anything that can be done without 60 votes?"

….

[I]n her interview with Roll Call, Pelosi stopped short of saying the filibuster should be done away with altogether, but she used some of her bluntest language yet to defend the use of reconciliation as something that has been used with regularity by Republican and Democratic presidents alike.

"We have set the stage for that. It’s important for us to remind the American people of the inconsistency that the Republicans have in saying this is unusual. No, five times President Bush used it. … This is what the Republicans did to pass their bills, their tax cuts for the rich," Pelosi said.

"It’s up to us to make sure the public knows that this is not extraordinary. And the public knows that a constitutional majority is 51. It would be a reflection on us if we could not convince people that this is not an unusual place to go."

And Pelosi complained about the never-ending filibusters by Senate Republicans going far beyond the health care debate.

"Yes, the filibuster has its place, it may even have its place in health care — it’s a very big issue. But does it have its place on every appointment and every piece of legislation? We have over 200 bills over there that haven’t been taken up. Most of them, 70 percent of them, were passed with over 50 Republican votes in the House. …

"We haven’t gotten as much done as we should and one of those reasons is because of what the Republicans are doing. … The American people have to make a judgment about the conduct of the Republicans in insisting on that on every vote, and the Democrats in the Senate have to deal with the challenge that they have."

….

Pelosi also said she is open to Republicans presenting new ideas at the Feb. 25 bipartisan health care summit called for by Obama, but she said she’s already seen the Republican health care alternative offered on the House floor and said it only provided insurance for an additional 3 million people instead of the more than 30 million in the Democratic bill.

It’s an important political message to set up going into the February 25 meeting–Republicans not only have obstructed the process every step of the way. The summit is pretty unlikely to change that dynamic, and the summit can be used, if Obama and Reid are willing to go along with Pelosi in this messaging, to get the bill done through reconciliation… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Daily Kos>

It’s certainly time for reconciliation, but more.  Rachel Maddow and Howard Dean make one of the best cases I have heard for ending the filibuster.

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

This bill will never pass, because the GOP will filibuster it.  But it only takes 51 votes to change the Senate rules if they do so on the first day of the next new session in January.

Off Topic:  I’m adding a new feature to the daily Open Thread. Short Takes are brief news references with links.  Cjeck it out.

Share
Feb 022010
 

Yesterday I needed to sleep and got tied up in chores so I didn’t get any visiting in, but I did keep up with comments here.  Today I should do better, before the busy part of the week hits.

We had a troll issue this week in the Margolis thread.  Please do not feed the trolls.  They thrive on insults and drama.  Feel free to deflate their talking points respectfully with factual information.  If they insult you, please ignore them.  I will deal with it.

Today’s Jig Zone puzzle took me 4:06.  To do it, Click Here.  How did you do?

The boys at Red State Update are ready for Groundhog Day.

 

Here’s your cartoon:

What’s interesting this week?

Share
 Comments Off on Open Thread – 2/1/2010
Feb 012010
 

Politics Plus returned to the Internet on September 5, 2009 as a brand new blog.  Our first five months show an excellent  increase in activity after a great start..  As of Midnight we have had 33, 612 visitors.  Last month, we had 8,410 visitors, up 1,180 from December, an increase of 14.7%.  We also has 10, 134 page views, up 1,476 from December, an increase of  17.0%.  This averages to 271/327 visits/views per day, up 35/48 from December.  I’m most pleased.  After the normal December slowdown we’re forging ahead much faster than I had imagined.  Here’s a graph of February visits and views.

vvm Here’s a graph of visits and views since we reopened.

vvt Here’s a graph of how long people are staying while they’re here.  It covers only the last five hundred visitors.

vl And here is our most recent ClustrMap, last updated 1/17, showing our readers from all over the world:

cmap1-10 Our 26,000th through 33,000th visitors, respectively, were Lisa G, Kay in Maine, Mark, Hillblogger, Stimpson, Jolly Roger, Hill and Mark.  You’ll find a special section in our sidebar honoring them and linking to their blogs.
We still have a Technorati Authority of 1, which means they have not updated us since the day they recognized our existence.  I applied five months ago.  How frustrating!  Although I have emailed them on several occasions, the only response I received is a automatically generated email saying that they will get to us whenever they get to us.  Someday (sigh).  According to Google Webmaster Tools, there are currently 5,065  external links to Politics Plus.  There are 169 external links to just our top five articles in January.   I think we are well within the B list range for popularity, but since that term is unique to Technorati, so to have that recognition, we’ll just have to wait for them to get off their imperial arses.  So please keep linking the articles you like here to your blogs, facebook pages, stumble upon pages, etc.  When you see material you like here, the operative commandment is: “Thou shalt steal!!”  Please do link back though.  Hat-tips are much appreciated.
I use the terms “we” and “our” while referring to Politics Plus. Since this is a one-person blog.  I assure you, I’m not doing so in the royal sense.  The we in Politics Plus includes all of you. Without your presence and comments, this blog would be pointless.  Newcomers repeatedly praise the quality of the comments here.  Whatever success this blog does and will enjoy is because of you, so please congratulate yourself.  Thank you all for another fantastic month.

Share

News IQ Results

 Posted by at 4:07 am  Blog News, Politics
Jan 312010
 

Here is the original article for the quiz you took yesterday:

Pew-Overall The public has consistently expressed strong interest in the health care debate, but relatively few Americans can correctly answer two key questions related to the Senate’s consideration of health care legislation.

In the latest installment of the Pew Research Center’s News IQ Quiz, just 32% know that the Senate passed its version of the legislation without a single Republican vote. And, in what proved to be the most difficult question on the quiz, only about a quarter (26%) knows that it takes 60 votes to break a filibuster  in the Senate and force a vote on a bill. The survey was conducted before Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown won a special election to the Senate on Jan. 19; Brown’s election means Senate Democrats can no longer count on a 60-vote majority once he takes office.

About six-in-ten (59%) correctly identify China as the foreign country holding the most U.S. government debt. Nearly as many (57%) know that the United States imports two-thirds of the oil it consumes. As was the case in previous knowledge surveys, a majority (55%) knows the current unemployment rate is about 10%. However, far fewer (36%) correctly estimate the current level of the Dow Jones Industrial Average at about 10,000 points.

The news quiz, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press Jan. 14-17 among 1,003 adults reached on cell phones and landlines, asked 12 multiple choice questions on subjects ranging from economics and foreign affairs to prominent people in the news. Americans answered an average of 5.3 questions correctly.  

The survey finds that while the public struggled with most of the political questions on the survey, most Americans (56%) know that there currently is more than one woman serving on the Supreme Court. Notably, this is the only question on the quiz where as many women as men answer correctly; men scored significantly better on other questions. 

In response to questions about terrorism and national security, half (50%) correctly identify Yemen as the country where intelligence officials believe the suspect in an attempted Christmas Day airline bombing received training and bomb materials. A slightly smaller percentage (43%) knows that during all of 2009 there were more American military fatalities in Afghanistan than in Iraq; 32% said more U.S. troops were killed in Iraq. This question proved difficult for many, even though interest in developments in Afghanistan – and media coverage – picked up in late 2009 as President Obama announced his war strategy [See "Top Stories of 2009: Economy, Obama and Health Care," released Dec. 29, 2009].

Pew-Demographics Questions about people in the news round out the quiz update.  About four-in-ten (39%) know that Nevada Democrat Harry Reid is the majority leader of the U.S. Senate. About a third (32%) correctly pick Michael Steele as the chairman of the Republican National Committee. Interestingly, nearly half of Republicans (48%) are able to identify Reid as Senate majority leader compared with just a third (33%) of Democrats. More Republicans can identify Reid as majority leader than can identify Steel as chairman of the RNC (37%).

About four-in-ten (41%) correctly say that Stephen Colbert is a comedian and television talk show host. This is the only question on the quiz that more people younger than 30 than older people answer correctly (49% vs. 39%).

Asked how many GOP senators voted for the chamber’s health care bill on Dec. 24, only 32% know that the measure received no support from Republican members. About as many answer incorrectly, saying that five (13%), 10 (8%), or 20 (8%) GOP Senators voted for the bill. About four-in-ten (39%) do not know or decline to answer.

A smaller percentage (26%) knows that 60 votes are needed to break a filibuster in the Senate. About as many (25%) mistakenly say that a simple majority of 51 votes can break a filibuster.As with most other questions on the news quiz, well-educated people, older Americans and men are more likely to correctly answer the questions about the Senate vote on health care and the filibuster.

Less than a third of Republicans or Democrats can correctly identify the number of votes needed to end a filibuster (30% among Republicans, 25% among Democrats). College graduates fared better than other demographic groups on this question, but fewer than half of college graduates (45%) know that it takes 60 Senate votes to overcome a filibuster…

Inserted from <Pew Research>

Nine of us took the quiz and earned an average score of  9.77.  As a group we are more knowledgeable than 84% of the public.  If nothing else, this should highlight the responsibility we have to teach those with whom we interact.

Share

Poll Results – 1/31/2010

 Posted by at 3:54 am  Blog News
Jan 312010
 

Here are the results of our poll on revisiting comments:

Poll0130

And here are your comments:

From Jolly Roger on January 24, 2010 at 1:29 am.

 

I almost always do, especially when I comment on right-turd blogs. You’d be amazed how many times my comment is either not what I wrote, or entirely gone.

 

From Otis on January 19, 2010 at 9:51 pm.

 

I am making sure my wife isn’t making too much fun of me.

 

From Kevin on January 19, 2010 at 11:40 am

 

I am always interested in what others have to say in response to what I write, or if I made an error and someone corrects me, but sometimes I forget where I left my comment!

 

From Sue on January 17, 2010 at 4:47 pm

 

I always go back and see if my comment made an impact. I’m always flattered when someone agrees with what I have to say!

 

 

From sasha vagramov in reply to Sue on January 18, 2010 at 8:13 pm

 

what is this commet for?

 

From Sue in reply to sasha vagramov on January 25, 2010 at 7:11 pm

 

who is this sasha and what exactly is she saying to me??

 

From Lisa G. on January 17, 2010 at 2:21 pm.

 

I love to see what TC and everyone else has to say about my comments. You are all such smart people and I learn something from all of you everyday – thank you so much for my free education on all topics!

I voted almost always, because I do whenever I can, but at times I get so busy that by the time I get back to a site, I have forgotten where my comments are, and I seldom have time to explore old threads searching for them.

Sue, I think she was someone new who didn’t know how to use the comment section.

The new poll may evoke some controversy.  Check it out.

Share

What’s Your News IQ?

 Posted by at 2:58 am  Blog News, Politics
Jan 302010
 

Pew-me

Pew Research has produced a fascinating quiz, and I’d like to see how well our readers do.  It’s easy to do, just 12 multiple choice questions with 3 more for demographics.  I got all 12, but don’t be disappointed if you do not.  I spend several hours a day researching.  Please Comment with your results.  Tomorrow, I’ll post an article on the quiz and compare our results to t6he country as a whole.

To take the quiz, Click Here.

Share
Jan 212010
 

Yesterday I posted a major editorial in which I analyzed the causes of Coakley’s defeat in the Massachusetts special election for the Senate.  Since then, I have heard pundit after pundit stating the need for more bipartisanship, the exact opposite of my conclusions.  However, a new poll of Democrats and Independents who voted for Obama in 2008, but either voted for Brown or stayed home Wednesday backs my contentions.

opinion-poll Massachusetts voters who backed Barack Obama in the presidential election a year ago and either switched support to Republican Senate candidate Scott Brown or simply stayed home, said in a poll conducted after the election Tuesday night that if Democrats enact tougher policies on Wall Street, they’ll be more likely to come back to the party in the next election.

A majority of Obama voters who switched to Brown said that "Democratic policies were doing more to help Wall Street than Main Street." A full 95 percent said the economy was important or very important when it came to deciding their vote.

In a somewhat paradoxical finding, a plurality of voters who switched to the Republican — 37 percent — said that Democrats were not being "hard enough" in challenging Republican policies.

It would be hard to find a clearer indication, it seems, that Tuesday’s vote was cast in protest.

The poll also upends the conventional understanding of health care’s role in the election. A plurality of people who switched — 48 — or didn’t vote — 43 — said that they opposed the Senate health care bill. But the poll dug deeper and asked people why they opposed it. Among those Brown voters, 23 percent thought it went "too far" — but 36 percent thought it didn’t go far enough and 41 percent said they weren’t sure why they opposed it.

Among voters who stayed home and opposed health care, a full 53 percent said they opposed the Senate bill because it didn’t go far enough; 39 percent weren’t sure and only eight percent thought it went too far.

The firm Research 2000 conducted the post-election survey Tuesday night on behalf of three progressive organizations — the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy for America and MoveOn.org.

Taken from interviews of 500 Obama backers who voted in the Senate election and 500 Obama backers who sat out the election, the firm discovered that 18 percent of Obama backers who voted in the Senate race ended up casting ballots for Brown.

Of that group, 82 percent said they favored a public option for insurance coverage, with 14 percent opposed. Of those who sat out the election, 86 percent favored the public option, while only seven percent opposed it. The findings suggests that progressive arguments that disappointed Obama supporters deserted have serious merit… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Huffington Post>

Just a moment ago, I heard Bitch McConnell say that the results of the election clearly show that the American people don’t the government taking over health care.  Either he is lying, or he is a fool.  Probably both.  These results clearly show that the voters who gave Obama a landslide victory in that state oppose the health care bill because they favor a public option.

The voters sent a clear message.  They are not happy with business as usual.  They want change we can believe in.  If Obama and the Democrats don’t get out of bed with the Banksters and the Corporate Criminals of Health Care, there will be hell to pay.

Share