Rest assured we’re wishing you a very …


And even if our plans for your day of celebration might go a bit awry …

There will be no doubt …


And as Abraham Lincoln said …



Our own head honcho Joanne Dixon (aka, underwriter505 at Daily Kos) made the “Top 18” posts, articles or Diaries (for us old-timers) over at Daily Kos!
Please, go and enjoy a great read:
(You don’t have to be a Kossack to read it – it’s free. But you have to belong if you won’t to vote or participate.)
Acclamation
Accolades
Adulation
Applause
Approbation
Bouquets
Bravos
Commendation
Congratulations
Encomiums
Homage
Kudos
Laudation
Paeans
Plaudits
Praise
… And A Tip of the Hat for A Job Well Done!
[EDITOR’S NOTE: Hang in there, Joanne – it closes with your promised “surprise”.]
You probably remember that during Pres. Biden’s SOTU speech, the Bobbsey Bimbos, MTG Greene and Lauren Boebert, stood up and heckled him while talking about his dead son, Beau. (And Speaker Pelosi did tell them to “Shut Up!”)

Boebert subsequently claimed to have received a message from a military Mom praising her antics. But in posting her Tweet, Boebert (R-Idiot-Brigade) decided to invent the entirely new military rank of “Lieutenant Corporal”.
After I spoke up for our 13 fallen military heroes at the State of the Union address a few of their parents reached out to thank me for recognizing them.
One of the parents encouraged me to share her message. Here it is. pic.twitter.com/Eu0IKn2FG0
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) March 15, 2022
This set the Twitterverse into action, with popular poster Ron Filipkowski setting the record straight WRT imaginary rank:
Sporting a new look, Boebert recounts the incident where she yelled out during SOTU. She talks about Pelosi telling her to shut up, then says the mom of a “lieutenant corporal” (there’s no such thing) wrote her to thank her. pic.twitter.com/0WFuy1PLI8
— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) March 15, 2022
It also prompted one of America’s most recent heroes, who testified against TFG, LTC Alexander S. Vindman (USA Ret.), to respond:
The U.S. military doesn’t have a rank of “lieutenant corporal” so what was the nationality of the mother who thanked her? https://t.co/nuKGtFTOKF
— Alexander S. Vindman (@AVindman) March 15, 2022
And others soon jumping in to join the fun:
fun fact: Lauren Boebert is a Lieutenant Corporal in the Congressional Moron Caucus
— Jeff Tiedrich (@itsJeffTiedrich) March 15, 2022
Some even went so far as to provide Boebert some military defense, with one tying it in with MTG Greene’s recent display of her total lack of knowledge between the Nazi’s Gestapo and the delicious soup Gazpacho:
Could y'all give Boebert a break?
I'm pretty sure "Lieutenant Corporal" is a rank in MTG's Gazpacho Police. https://t.co/pZ8FWYaRYV pic.twitter.com/dpfjw299k1
— Fr. Robert R. Ballecer, SJ (@padresj) March 15, 2022
But this is my favorite military rejoinder:
The US Military doesn’t have a rank of lieutenant corporal but Lauren Boebert is a major asshole.
— Tony Posnanski (@tonyposnanski) March 15, 2022
But leave it to John Fugelsang to take it to another level with a mocking parody of the Major-General’s song “I Am the Very Model” from the Gilbert and Sullivan 1880 opera, The Pirates of Penzance.
I was fortunate enough to have seen it on Broadway back when I still had my hearing in the very early 1980s – but if you’re not familiar with it, here’s the English National Opera version:
And Fugelsang’s fantastic three-verse parody mocking Boebert:
I am the very model of a dim lieutenant corp-oral
My judgment nonexistent & my intellect prim-ordial
I get opinions from the Tucker Carlson editorial
And spread disinformation and rumors conspira-torial…— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) March 16, 2022
Still battling computer issues, but wanted to get this posted:
Today’s CBS “Sunday Morning” w/ Jane Pauley is doing a feature story on Randy Rainbow.
Obviously check local listings for time.

The passing of Madame Secretary Madeleine Albright on March 23, 2022, at the age of 84 prompted me to wonder how best to pay tribute to her many history-making accomplishments.
President Bill Clinton first selected her as our U.S Ambassador to the United Nations and then in 1997 elevated her to Secretary of State, thus becoming the highest-ranking woman in the history of U.S. government.
While some people are said to wear their heart on their sleeve, Madame Secretary wore it on her chest as a brooch from her astonishing collection of pins.
Sec. Albright explains: “I clearly have always liked jewelry, but it had not occurred to me that they could, in fact, become part of diplomacy. It all began with Saddam Hussein.”
As ambassador to the United Nations in 1994, she criticized and pressured Mr. Hussein to allow ongoing weapon inspections. This prompted the state-controlled media in Baghdad to call her “an unparalleled serpent.”
The next time she met with Iraqi diplomats she bravely wore her magnificent gold serpent brooch. (Although she admits she does not like snakes at all.) She thereby transformed her brooch collection into her own personal semaphore which she expertly used to convey a message or a mood.
The media constantly asked her how high-level talks were going, so she decided to transform “Read my lips” to “Read My Pins” – which became the title of one of her best-selling books.

Originally, I had hoped to provide a detailed translation of her collection. But since it numbers well over 200 brooches (most of them simple, inexpensive costume jewelry), it was clearly too much.
Suffice it to say that when she’s in a good mood or conveying high hopes, Albright would wear ladybugs, flowers, suns and hot-air balloons. On bad days she’d sport spiders and carnivorous animals. If she felt progress was slower than she wanted she’d wear a snail or maybe a turtle pin. And if she was dealing with crabby people, she’d don a crab.
Albright had toyed with the idea of an exhibit of her pins, but several galleries in Washington, DC turned the idea down cold. But the Museum of Arts and Design in NYC thought it had possibilities and curated a show that has since travelled to her alma mater (Wellesley), virtually every presidential library from FDR on and highlighted at the Smithsonian.
This is how a typical exhibit is showcased:

To view a wider variety of her pins I’ve divided them into categories – but with no further details, as it was just too overwhelming. But you’ll easily pick out the gold serpent brooch that set her on this path.
I’ll note two unique ones: One of her favorites is the clay heart made by her five-year-old daughter that she wears every Valentine’s Day. And the other is the “Shattered Glass Ceiling” that she wore when Hillary Clinton gave her acceptance speech at the 2016 DNC.
After tonight, this pin will be the only piece of glass ceiling left at #DNCinPHL! #tweetmypins #ImWithHer pic.twitter.com/sm5UUQiVw4
— Madeleine Albright (@madeleine) July 28, 2016
I hope you enjoy a small sampling of Madeleine Albright’s eclectic collection of brooches, arranged in alphabetical order by categories.
FAUNA

FLORA

MISCELLANEOUS

PATRIOTIC

RESOURCES
For more information on Sec. Madeleine Albright’s life and brooch collection, I suggest these sites, in no particular order:
Obituaries & A Tribute by Hillary Clinton
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/23/us/madeleine-albright-dead.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/25/opinion/madeleine-albright-secretary-of-state.html
Brooches
https://madmuseum.org/exhibition/read-my-pins
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113278807
https://www.oprah.com/style/madeleine-albrights-pin-collection/all

Watching some of the confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson (can only watch briefly, or I’ll blow a gasket), I finally had it with all the clowns, but especially my own senator – Joshua “I-Support-Traitorous-Insurrectionists” Hawley. So this morning I faxed him this letter:
Friday, March 25, 2022
Mr. Josh Hawley
212 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
RE: MERITLESS TO THE POINT OF DEMAGOGUERY
Mr. Hawley:
Your toddler-esque (bordering on infantile) behavior during the Senate hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation was aptly characterized by fellow Republican Andrew McCarthy in the “National Review” as a “smear” that was “meritless to the point of demagoguery”.
Let’s take a look at the FACTS that would lead to such a withering criticism from a fellow right-wing idealogue like McCarthy that was published in a dedicated radical right-wing magazine.
[I] Taking Jackson’s Remarks out of Context
From a Tweet by you on March 16:
“Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of ‘less-serious child pornography offender.’ … ’A ‘less-serious’ child porn offender?”
The FACTS: She opined no such thing. She was simply asking questions about it.
[II] Mischaracterizing the USSC’s Work
From another Tweet by you on March 16:
“As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn.”
Two critical FACTS you chose to elide:
[1] The USSC is bipartisan, as no more than four members of the seven-member USSC can be from one party.
… and
[2] The recommendations you criticized were unanimously approved.
[III] Distorting Judge Jackson’s Record
In your long Twitter thread of March 16, you list a number of cases purportedly claiming that Judge Jackson did not meet sentencing recommendations.
Not only are you wrong on the FACTS, but you chose to ignore the 2021 USSC report of 2019 that only 30 percent of non-production child-porn offenders received a sentence within the guideline range.
In addition to ignoring the FACTS, you also chose to ignore what U.S. probation officers had recommended in these cases.
Additionally, you yourself have voted to confirm at least three federal judges who also engaged in the same pornography sentencing practices for which you criticize Judge Jackson.
Your entire toxic pornography obsession consisted of very weakly-presented misinformation that relied on cherry-picked elements of Judge Jackson’s record that were taken out of context, distorted and mischaracterized. And it fell like a house of cards under the slightest of scrutiny.
Bottom line: You should be ashamed of yourself. I know that the good citizens of Missouri are ashamed to have you as a senator for our state.
GROW UP!
Respectfully,
[NAME]
[CITY]
PS: After your raised-fist salute to the traitorous insurrectionist on January 6, 2021, rest assured that Lin-Manuel Miranda’s lyrics from his Tony Award-winning smash Broadway musical “Hamilton” apply to you:
“WELL, HE’S NEVER GOING TO BE PRESIDENT NOW!”
The Equality Act bill to prevent discrimination against LGBT+ people passed the House a year ago. And since then, Rep. Lauren Boebert has insisted on calling it the “Supremacy of Gays, Lesbians and Transvestites Act”.
Rep. Lauren Boebert tells Steve Bannon the Equality Act is "supremacy of gays, lesbians and transvestites" pic.twitter.com/j8T2Yx5RxT
— Justin Horowitz (@justinhorowitz_) March 3, 2021
She has since waged an ongoing battle against folks in the LGBT+ community who elect to select their own appropriate pronoun for themselves. Apparently, the fact that a gay Democrat (Alex Walker) recently announced his candidacy against Boebert in Colorado (with a rather … ahhh … hmmm … unique ad) has rekindled her old battle against pronoun-selections that flared up last year when Boebert brazenly announced that her pronoun is “Patriot”.
My pronoun is “Patriot”.
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) May 25, 2021
Naturally, the Twitterverse wasn’t going to let this flagrant grade-school level grammar error pass without passing out a few corrective red check marks. So let’s revisit some of the better grammar “lessons”.
First- patriot is not a pronoun.
Second- there are many words to describe you… and patriot is not one of them.
Idiot is the first word that comes to mind. https://t.co/KHs2fQDF9N
— CJ 🌊 (@CJ_isnowblue) May 26, 2021
"Patriot" is not a pronoun.
A Patriot would have condemned the Jan 6 insurrection, not encouraged it. pic.twitter.com/mRbKNx6IyF— D Villella ❄️ (@dvillella) May 26, 2021
Why has the word “patriot” been co-opted by the right? I know a lot of patriotic queer folk. You don’t own patriotism. You never will. I’m gonna keep flying my American flag next to my pride flag.
— V (@Veronica_iLse) May 26, 2021
It’s a noun. So is “idiot”. https://t.co/NIIhc4My3U
— Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) May 26, 2021
We know it isn't “Christian.”
— Rev. Dr. Chuck Currie (@RevChuckCurrie) May 26, 2021
#LaurenBoebertIsSoDumb she can’t figure out what a pronoun is.
Also, is anyone else annoyed the word “patriot” has been stolen by white nationalist and feels they no longer can use it? That bothers me.
— Amanda (she/her) I stand wth Ukraine 🇺🇦 (@EffinLeftMama) May 25, 2021
Grammar isn’t your thing. Neither is governing. You’re nothing but a troll.
— Anita Creamer (@AnitaCreamer) May 26, 2021
"Patriot" is a noun, not a pronoun. Supporting those who tried to overthrow the government is the exact opposite of patriot. It's a seditionist.
A better "pronoun" for you would be parrot
— Aaron loves democracy (@flyfishcedarci1) May 25, 2021
Your adjectives are "traitorous," "ignorant," and "embarrassing."
— John Pavlovitz (@johnpavlovitz) May 26, 2021
No, @laurenboebert, you're just an ignorant (adjective) dumbass (noun) who is an affront (noun) to our Founding Fathers' dream of an enlightened (adjective) America. You (pronoun) are a traitor (noun) who betrays (verb) all who fought and died for freedom (noun). https://t.co/nYfaPehiZM pic.twitter.com/jb66Ha2RLd
— Bryan Dawson (@BryanDawsonUSA) May 26, 2021
Your grammar school education is “incomplete.”
— David Avallone (@DAvallone) May 26, 2021
This person is a walking PSA for staying in school. https://t.co/Q5dximYMEY
— Carolyn from Maryland (@carolyn_from) May 26, 2021
it's a wonder you remember to breathe
— Dad Jokes Panda (@TrashPandaFTW) May 26, 2021