Dec 112021
Mark Meadows In Contempt of Congress & With No Viable Executive Privilege, It’s Indictment Time
The Lincoln Project – Protect America
politicsrus – Protect Democracy HD
Rebel HQ – NDLB’s 2022 lineup is ready to send the GQP packing!
This Scene From The Titus Show Stuck with Trae Crowder Ever Since it Aired
Really American – Republicans COWER in Fear of Trump
Beau – Let’s talk about altering the Supreme Court…
5 Responses to “Video Thread 12/11/2021”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
I don’t expect to get much information out of the committee, because people seem willing to go to jail to protect Trump. Go figure.
Or to protect themselves from Trump**. I’m beginning to think the closed analogy to Trump** Might be Bugsy Siegel. Other mob bosses were terrifying, and vengeful, but they played by sets of rules (of their own.) Bugsy didn’t play by any rules. Batshit crazy. Hence the nickname.
Every idiot like these increases my respect for Cohen.
Comment from Mitch –
GK: Meadows needs(?) to sell books, he has not got enough in the bank? What happened, Trump “forgot” to pay him? Having worked for Trump seems to be an indication that one is not too intelligent, but good, perhaps, at shooting oneself in the foot.
LP: Indeed!
Politicsrus: That would be nice, but we will see.
Rebel HQ: Going for the rural voters may be the best idea going!
Titus: So, loosing both parents as a child, was my walk on glowing embers? Someone who married his childhood sweetheart (they’ve known each other since they were 10), said that they’ve known each other for 67 years. I said, “I haven’t known ME for 67 years…and I’m a little bunch of a way older than that. But, I do not know that Titus’s thesis is accurate.
RA: Trump is a cancer, and everything he touches does die!
Beau: SCOTUS has not been nonpartisan for a while, now. One can thank McTurtle for the latest iteration of partisanship there. St.Reagan did SCOTUS no favors, nor did his GOOP followers. “…partisan reasons because there are partisan judges.” is exactly the case, particularly in regard to the MIssissippi
case. And that was made unabashedly evident when the state law in question was set up. Voter turnout? Amen! I’m for expanding it, now. I’m also for impeaching Kavanaugh and Thomas, both of whom lied in initial hearings, and impeaching Barrett, who just avoided answering truthfully.
Mitch
Mark Meadows has proven that he is not only a jerk, but a moral coward as well.
LP: We live in dangerous times. Unless we get out the Progressive vote, unless we fight like absolute HELL, we will lose that precious right. Democracy will perish, and this once-great country will degenerate into either brutal fascism or bloody strife. We could be on the brink of a new Civil War. Bullets are better than ballots for changing policy and establishing justice!
Politicsrus: The GOP, or more probably the QOP, is no longer a real political party. it is a fan club for the Orange Orc. Also, ditto what I said re LP above.
Really American: Ditto what I said re Politicsrus. Except – calling tRump the son of a sow? That’s awfully mean – to pigs. I don’t trust Liz Cheney too far, though – she’s conservative to the marrow.
Beau: The SCOTUS is supposed to be non-partisan, but now it’s partisan to the moon and back. Actually, expanding it would make sense. There are thirteen circuit courts in the US, and each Supreme Court justice is supposed to oversee one, though these days some of them oversee more than one. Thus, why not have 13 justices? I have no idea how Biden (or anybody) could just toss out all of the justices and start over, though.
I also don’t see how the whole court could be tossed out to start over. I’m pretty confident Biden could not do it alone,. Both houses of Congress, ast a minimum, would have to be involved.
SCOTUS has no ethical code of its own, ant that is a real problem. Again, though, I don’t know how to fix it. I do believe there are justice currently on that bench who have committed actual Federal crimes. Perhaps those justices could be approached that way. (I’d love to be on that Grand Jury … but in conscence I’d have to recuse, being so opnionated already.)
I doubt thatat Beau thinks this way, but I do – proposing starting over might bve a great proposition to throw out for debate and then compromise from into something we could do.