Politics Plus

I suppose that most of his have problems paying for prescription drugs can be a problem.  My Medicare advantage solved mine for most of the year, but a little over two months ago, I fell into the donut hole.  $600 for one med hurts, but many are in far worse shape than I.  This reminded me that there is so much more to do to finish with health care reform.  The following editorial describes ways in which Big Pharma rips you off.

1. Astroturf Patients?

Pharma promotes fake patient advocacy groups [Murdoch delinked]  to lobby for its interests…

2. Cheating the Government

Pharma is now a top defrauder of the federal government. …

3. Trials and Fibulations

Presiding over clinical trials can make a doctor thousands per patient…

4. More Trials and Fibulations

Even without fraud, pharma-sponsored studies can deceive…

5. Overseas Adventurism

As pharma increasingly eyes poorer countries for new markets and cheaper manufacturing it also eyes them for cheaper clinical trials…

6. Clueless Institutional Review Boards

Institutional review boards, charged with overseeing clinical trials, should catch the unsafe drugs and shady trials [they don’t]…

7. ‘Previous Government Experience Desirable’

…the government is fighting itself...

8. Double Dealing at the Pharmacy

The best thing that ever happened to pharma (after direct-to-consumer advertising) is Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs)…

9. FDA Foreplay

A sneaky way pharma tries to get FDA to approve a drug — even when the science isn’t there –  is to float the drug to the public…

10. Pharma Service Announcements

Public service announcements are messages for your own good, like, "Do You Know the Seven Warning Signs of Cancer?"… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <Alternet>

I strongly encourage you to click through to the original article.  I gave you just a snippet of each of the first ten ways, and the last five are even more egregious than these.  It’s well worth the read.

Now, it may seem strange to talk about more reform now, when for the next two years, we’ll be fighting to keep what little we got, but now is not the time to go on defense.  Only by continuing to fight for the positive things America needs can we educate more Americans for the future.

There has been much ado about the Net Neutrality regulations passed by the FCC.  It is taking a lot of heat, both from the right and from left.  At the same time Democratic politicians and pundits are claiming that this measure satisfies Barack Obama’s campaign promise.  Does it?

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission passed “network neutrality” regulations, which aim to ensure equal access to all legal Internet content. Service providers will not be allowed to block rival services, nor will they be able to divide traffic to certain sites into fast and slow lanes, thus giving priority to preferred web content providers. The new regulations are still opposed by many open internet groups for not going far enough, and came after years of debate and millions of dollars of lobbying.

The announcement of a new federal regulation prompted a characteristic outburst from conservative leaders, who have consistently fear-mongered against net neutrality regulations as an evil progressive scheme to control the Internet. On the Senate floor, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) accused the Obama administration of trying to “nationalize” and “control” the Internet; radio host Rush Limbaugh also said Obama just took over the Internet (at the behest of George Soros, of course) and suggested Hugo Chavez would be jealous:

– McCONNELL: Today the Federal Communications Commission is expected to approve new rules on how American access information on the Internet. There’s a lot of people rightly concerned. … The Obama administration, which has already nationalized health care, the auto industry, insurance companies, banks, and student loans, will move forward with what could be the first step in controlling how Americans use the Internet by establishing federal regulations on its use….The Internet is an invaluable resource. It should be left alone. As Americans become more aware of what’s happening here, I suspect many will be alarmed, as I am, at the government’s intrusion. They’ll wonder, as many already do, if this is a Trojan horse for further meddling by the government.

– LIMBAUGH: Today the FCC approved a proposal by chairman Julius Genachowski to give the FCC power to prevent broadband providers from selectively blocking web traffic. And that’s just a ruse. Net Neutrality is not what this is really all about. This is about the feds wanting to control the Internet just as they control the public airwaves. They want to be able to determine who gets to say what, where, how often — they want to be able to determine what search services are providing what answers to your queries. It’s total government control of the Internet, and the regime has just awarded it to itself.

It’s another gleaming aspect of free speech, free market, private industry Obama has decided to take over as a Christmas present to himself and the Democrat National Committee and to Mr. Soros. He’s even beaten Hugo Chavez to the punch. Chavez is just talking about taking over the Internet in Venezuela; Obama has got it done.

Watch a compilation:

 

Elsewhere, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) tweeted [Teabagger liar delinked] that “unelected, unaccountable Democrat FCC commissioners are taking over the Internet.” Incoming Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) released a statement [Agent Orange delinked] blasting “yet another government takeover.”

Of course, these provisions do nothing of the sort… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

In my opinion, the plan does not go far enough.  It has exploitable loopholes.  On the other hand, there are some good things in this package.  It can’t be all bad, or Republicans would not be screaming like this.

So is it a promise kept?  Sadly, it falls into the same category as some of Obama’s other promises, specifically health care and financial reform.  The job is half done.  I don’t know how to score half a promise.