Mar 202016
 

Somehow, I have managed to pick up a sore throat and likely a cold . . . again.  My chiropractor had one and that is the only person I can think of to whom I have been close.  Arrggghhhh!  I am still awaiting my laptop so that I can join Nameless in frustration with learning Windows 10.  I have W7 on my desk top and like it but that will have to change sooner or later.  Because I have a bug, I won't be going to see my mother tomorrow.

Short Takes

CBC — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's recent trip to the U.S. appears to have made quite an impression on our American friends — perhaps too good an impression, judging by these videos of two New York men literally begging him to run for president.  …

Fortunately for Canada, Prime Minister Trudeau declined an invitation from these men begging him to run for U.S. president. 'I don't know if you noticed, but I actually have a job,' he said. 'And it's a pretty good one.'

In another video, Trudeau declines the invitation to run for president on the grounds that he's not U.S.-born.

The American men were quick to counter by pointing out that Republican presidential hopeful Ted Cruz was born in Calgary. 

"I have tremendous confidence in the American people," Trudeau told the men, but they weren't convinced. 

Just a little bit of humour to start your read.  Since Trudeau's visit to Washington just over a week ago, I have seen various positive posts about Trudeau, one even asking him to run for President of North America.  I think a modern Trudeaumania has been born.  From Wikipedia

Trudeaumania was the nickname given in early 1968 to the excitement generated by Pierre Trudeau's entry into the leadership race of the Liberal Party of Canada. Trudeaumania continued during the subsequent federal election campaign and during Trudeau's early years as Prime Minister of Canada

I remember it well!

National Law Journalh/t Barbara K, Care2 — A group of more than 350 legal scholars on Monday called upon senators to fulfill their constitutional obligation to consider a U.S. Supreme Court nominee submitted by President Barack Obama.

In a letter sent to Senate leaders, 356 professors and scholars said that leaving an eight-justice court in place would have dire consequences. They asserted that allowing Justice Antonin Scalia’s seat to remain unfilled until after the presidential election could cripple the court and set bad precedent.

“This preemptive abdication of duty is contrary to the process the framers envisioned in Article II, and threatens to diminish the integrity of our democratic institutions and the functioning of our constitutional government,” reads the letter, addressed to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky; Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada; Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa; and ranking Judiciary Committee member Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont.

Reached for comment, a spokesman for McConnell wrote in an email, “The Leader’s position is well-known.”

Alliance for Justice, a liberal organization focused on the federal judiciary, circulated the letter.

Scalia Quote

The letter reads in part:

As scholars deeply committed to the fair administration of justice, upholding the rule of law, and educating future generations of the legal profession, the undersigned professors of law urge you to fulfill your constitutional duty to give President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee a prompt and fair hearing and a timely vote.

The Senate’s obligation in this circumstance is clear. Under Article II of the Constitution, the president “shall appoint . . . judges to the Supreme Court,” and the Senate’s role is to provide “advice and consent.” Yet before the president has even made a nomination to fill the current vacancy, a number of senators have announced that they will not perform their constitutional duty. Instead, they plan to withhold advice and consent until the next president is sworn in nearly a year from now. This preemptive abdication of duty is contrary to the process the framers envisioned in Article II, and threatens to diminish the integrity of our democratic institutions and the functioning of our constitutional government.

President Obama was elected to a four-year term in 2012. According to the Constitution, that term has more than 300 days remaining. There is no exception to the Constitution holding that the president lacks the authority or duty to appoint justices to the Supreme Court because he is in the last year of his presidency. In fact, six justices have been confirmed in presidential-election years since 1900, including Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, and Republican-appointee Anthony Kennedy, who was confirmed by a Democratically-controlled Senate during President Ronald Reagan’s last year in office. 

6 scotus justices_for email

Here is a petition from the Alliance for Justice to Tell Senators to #Do Your Job

Rachel Maddow spoke with Nan Aron, president of the AFJ, back in mid February on the conundrum.

IMO, McTurtle and Grassley, nor any other Republican for that matter, should not be in any leadership position.  I hope this Republican stupidity hurts them in the election, regardless of whether the matter is solve or not.

Raw Story — In November, many Americans who didn’t vote in 2014 or 2015 will be casting a vote for president of the United States. Midterms and off-year elections are often ignored by registered voters, but anyone who doubts the importance of voting in every election need only look at the type of damage far-right Republicans can do at the state or local level when they are in control. Although Democrats have won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections, and President Barack Obama was reelected decisively in 2012, Republicans fared extremely well during the 2010 and 2014 midterms, not only in Congress, but in the state and local races. The result has been an obscene amount of destructive legislation, from anti-union laws to harsh anti-abortion and anti-contraception measures to laws that harm the environment.

Below are 10 terrible laws or bills brought to you by some of the more obscure GOP politicians wielding way too much power in statehouses and state legislatures around the country.  …

11. Senate Bill 4: Kentucky’s New Anti-Abortion Law

Signed into law by Republican Gov. Matt Bevin last month, Senate Bill 4 requires that women in Kentucky receive in-person counseling 24 hours before an abortion. The Kentucky ACLU describes SB 4 as “an unnecessary barrier to safe and legal abortion practices,” and Derek Selznick (director of the Kentucky ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project), said, “Legislators were not elected to provide medical advice or care to Kentucky women.” This is the same Bevin who began dismantling Kentucky’s successful, state-run Obamacare exchange, Kynect, right after taking office in January. So the health of Kentucky women is not high on his list of priorities.

Click through for the other ten laws pushed by right-wing Republican nutters.  If you don't want this kind of BS, then take a stand and get out the vote.

NY Times — Republican leaders adamantly opposed to Donald J. Trump’s candidacy are preparing a 100-day campaign to deny him the presidential nomination, starting with an aggressive battle in Wisconsin’s April 5 primary and extending into the summer, with a delegate-by-delegate lobbying effort that would cast Mr. Trump as a calamitous choice for the general election.

Recognizing that Mr. Trump has seized a formidable advantage in the race, they say that an effort to block him would rely on an array of desperation measures, the political equivalent of guerrilla fighting.

There is no longer room for error or delay, the anti-Trump forces say, and without a flawlessly executed plan of attack, he could well become unstoppable.

But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative to Mr. Trump’s hard-edged populism.

perry

Some prominent Republicans have considered Mr. Perry as a possible independent candidate for the general election if Mr. Trump receives the party’s presidential nomination.

Are Republicans making one Oops after another?

My Universe — I asked TC to do a special report from a local farm.

TC hanging out in barnTC in the barn assessing the needs!

Tucked away in Spokane, WA, there is a shelter for cats that sets itself apart from the pack with its novel, and incredibly successful, approach to caring for cats in need of help. Instead of a life of cages, occasional adoption events, and possible euthanasia, these cats are brought into SpokAnimal shelter as feral or stray, and end up leaving gainfully employed!

Click through The Animal Rescue Site for the rest of his report.  Excellent report Puddy Tat!!

Share

  11 Responses to “Squatch’s Open Thread 19/03/2016”

  1. 1. Great post on Trudeaumania but remember,So Americans have been in love with Canada since before the civil war.

    2. Republican obstruction started years ago when they bought the rights to the codes for voting machines. Now they can't be voted out.

    3. New anti-women laws are the new "Republicans Gone Wild" hits.

    4. Spokanimal should be the model used for most animal shelters.

    Peace.

  2. If you're in need of a thorough – and I mean THOROUGH – tutorial WRT Windows 10, after extensive search I think the one at CNET fills the bill.

    Might not be the easiest to navigate, but it is complete!

  3. CBC: Kudos to your Prime Minister! Mr.Trudeau is a welcome guest to the US!

    NLJ: So signed.!! Can't believe this. Still. Just do what you are paid to do! Good clip too.

    RS: This is scary! The Rethugs, ugh. Get out and vote them out!!

    NYT: They permitted Trump to go unfettered, and now they are paying the price…No to Perry!!! Nope, nada!!

    My Universe: How very sweet, looks like Puddy Cat has everything under control too.

    Hope that you start feeling better, drink some hot tea, and rest. Take care, and Thanks, Lynn.

  4. CBC – Well, we could go farther and fare worse, to quote the old saying.

    National Law Journal and Rachel – Supposing the Republicans succumbed to pressure and held hearings, and had an up-or-down vote, you know – KNOW – that vote would go down rather than up.  But I truly don't see that happening.  The Republican Party is now the toddler who can hold his breath the longest (and, yes, multiple jokes about "turning blue" have occurred to me).  While I consider it important to keep going on record that their behavior is unConstitutional, privately I'm just as happy they don't hold hearings and swift boat someone who seems to be an honorable man.  Even if (as the stage is likely right for) the case Obama v Mcconnell were to be filed and go the the (8 member) Supreme Court, and it ruled 8-0 for Obama, I don't see hearings being held in the foreseeable future.

    Raw Story – If the Supreme Court impasse demonstrates the importance of voting, these bills demonstrate ths importance of voting all the way down the ticket.  Republicans are very good at that.  Democrats unfortunately not so much.

    NY Times – When was the last Republican candidate for ANYTHING in a General Election NOT an OOOPS?

    SpokAnimal – Definitely an idea whose time has come!

  5. I hope you feel better.  I have started carrying a few surgical masks in my wheelchair pouch.  I pop one on, whenever I'm around someone that has a cold/flu.

    I'd prefer Bernie, but I just might choose Trudeau over Hillary.

    Amen!

    All 11 are harbingers of what a Republican Reich eill be like, if we don't stop them this year.

    Great minds fall in the same ditch. smiley

    Except for this blog asnd my volunteer work, whick combine at more that a full time job, I'm retired. cool

  6. Applying Mitch McTurtle McConnell's own "logic": If he thinks Pres. Obama is not allowed to  carry out his Constitutional responsibilities because McTurtle says he’s a “lame duck” – then by the same “logic” Rethuglicans are also now “lame ducks”, and therefore barred from casting any votes until “The people have spoken” come 2017.

     

  7. "But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative to Mr. Trump’s hard-edged populism."

     

    But . . . but . . . but Republicans have no principles.

  8. Sorry to hear about your new bug, Lynn. Did you get your flu shot this year?

    I started this comment about two hours ago, but was distracted by news updates from Belgium, with the death toll now at 34 and hundreds of people injured, those from the metro station often very badly from burns and from the shrapnel the bomb was loaded with. I've been following the news all day as Belgium is so close to us, both geographically and culturally (Flanders used to be part of the Netherlands until 1830 and remained Dutch/Flemish speaking). But the whole of the EU is shocked as it was a direct attack on EU's headquarters in Brussels. So sorry, Lynn, but I don't feel much like commenting right now.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.