Royalty – Politics Plus

Yesterday, Virgil and I played cribbage (I know – What a surprise!) As usual, we got a wide variety of hands. It seemed like I was counting for him more than usual today – but that’s just a feeling and may be wrong. We were definitely glad to see each other. particularly since I wasn’t able to see him two weeks ago, so we hadn’t seen each other for a month. We had communicated through phone calls. Fortunately, since this is Colorado and not, say, Mississippi, phone calls are cheap. From the traffic, especially going home, you would have thought that Memorial Day weekend was this week, instead of next, which it actually is. But when we got to the Pikes Peak International Raceway exit, a bunch of cars got off, so maybe they were having something ho on and that’s all it was.

Heather Cox Richardson discusses something I’ve been thinking. The Turmeric Tyrant thinks he wants to be king, maybe even an emperor. If he only knew how restricted actual kings and queens are today, he wouldn’t. And if his family knew how restricted royal families are, they wouldn’t want him to either. In almost every country that still has a king or queen, it is a legislative body – a Parliament – which has the real power. The monarch essentially does what he or she is told. And, as for families, they are the only ones who really have to defer to the monarch. I mean things like princesses can’t even choose their own lipstick. Anyone dining with the monarch must stand up and leave the table when the Monarch does, whether on not they have eaten their fill. Not that that is law – but it is court etiquette with the force of law if you are in the court. And they can’t be idle. They have to work (unless they are for some reason disqualified), generally for some charity or cause. They do get some choice – Diana, a former schoolteacher, worked for children’s welfare. Charles, when Prince of Wales, worked for historical preservation (the British Antiques Roadshow admired him.) Harry worked for the climate. Americans who say that the UK or other countries with a king or queen “should get rid of the monarchy” have no idea what they are talking about. Dictators, on the other hand, are “elected.” they may be sham elections compared to what ours are supposed to be like and in many states still are – pressures on voters here are not from the Government – yet. Apparently after our Revolution, when Europe saw the system was working pretty well, European countries started slowly shaping their governments to work more like it. I can’t think of a European country where a king or queen has unlimited power.

The F*ing News – irony may be dead (although I’ll never believe it), but sarcasm is very much alive.

Also going back to last week, in an email from the Vote Common Good PAC there was this: “Early results from our in-depth survey research on religious voters are starting to come in, and they are startling in the best possible way. For the first time, we’re asking the kinds of questions most polls skip — not just what religion someone checks on a form, but how their spiritual identity shapes how they show up in the world…and in the voting booth. I can’t share the details just yet — the study is still in progress — but I can tell you this: what we’re seeing is going to change how Democrats think about religious voters. It’s going to change how we train candidates, how we talk to persuadable voters, and how we win.” This makes me very interested in seeing the results of the survey. I have always felt there was more going on between people and religion – any religion – than met anyone’s eye, and certainly any politician’s eye. Jonathan Haidt’s work speaks to that, but not IMO fully, and in any case he’s not very well known. (I also think that “religion” is the wrong word for belief systems. The “lig” in “religion” is the same “lig” that is in “obligation,” and a belief system or a world view should be something more. But that’s neither here nor there.

I think I must address Joe Biden’s cancer diagnosis, which was characterized as “an aggressive form of prostate cancer which has metastasized to the bone.” Obviously this is a very serious diagnosis. It may not be a death sentence. This post from Democratic Underground (passed on from Threads) makes that point. Others who have written about their own experience with the same diagnosis report a wide range of outcomes. Some of those are in the comments at the same article. I don’t think I need to be a doctor to believe that a person’s general health outside particular diagnosis is a factor in how the body deals with any ailment. I’ve seen several places that hormone therapy is a possible alternative to chemo, and at least one added particularly with this diagnosis. I think we can have some confidence that Joe and his medical team will make the best possible choice. That said, nothing is certain. *Incidentally, Jacques Trudeau sent a message of support in English and French.)

Talking Points Memo addresses certain abuses of power which we all knew were coming, but at least are not targeting the poorest and most vulnerable among us. Which does not make them any less disgusting.

This is from Wonkette from Friday. I apologize for taking so long – but there’s nothing that really can be done about this story – I doubt whether overturning Dobbs would even prevent a repeat – you’ll see why. And we’ve already been fighting racism and misogyny for uncountable years but this happened anyway – I should say “is happening.”

And this, by Heather Cox Richardson, is from Thursday. It is the history of the Magna Carta. And it is ironic* that I can post it the day after I went on a rant about what royal life is really like – because it has been and still is a huge influence on why monarchies in Europe today are Constitutional Monarchies. Now we ned to ensure that the Kumquat Kleptocrat does not get his hands on our contemporary copy. (*See – irony is not dead.)

Politics Plus

Open Thread May 19 2025

Open Thread May 20 2025