Yesterday afternoon, as I was going to bed for the evening, my landlord came to check my radiator. Some radiators in the apartments are leaking into the businesses below. Naturally, mine is one of the culprits. My computer corner surrounds the radiator, so I have to tear it down by 8 AM to provide access to a repairman. He offered to have his people do it for me, because I’m sick, but there is no way I will let people who are technically challenged by a toaster tear down my system. I am not current with replies, but will catch up when I can. I will be offline until the radiator is repaired and I have redone my computer corner. So I may be back online tomorrow, or it could take several days.

Lynn has now won her fourth Big Mouth Award. For several months she has been our top commentator, and is also one of only two people, other than myself, that I have authorized to post articles here. Lynn is a denizen of Care2, and is still a Canadian, unfortunately for the US. I’ve said this before, but it still bears repeating. If 10% of US citizens had half the knowledge of and insight into US politics that this Canadian gal regularly displays, our country would be far better off. Congrats Lynn! She is a treasure, whose contribution to this site cannot be overstated. Please join me in giving her more of the kudos she so well deserves.
Here are the results of our Naughty or Nice poll. Although the respondents were not demographically representative, the results were certified by Santa himself. 😉

And here are your comments.
Posted by Lynn Squance on December 20, 2012 at 12:49 am.
I checked very naughty but really I would put myself in the "rotten to the core" category, just on basic principle.
Posted by Fred Lemon on December 19, 2012 at 6:44 am.
Luckily I discovered a wonderful woman this year that has changed my life forever so I had to check naughty. So be it.
Posted by Marva on December 16, 2012 at 10:47 am.
And I curse the lack of opportunities to be naughty! (had to mark Nice).
Posted by Patty on December 16, 2012 at 6:08 am.
Well, I’ve been very nice except to some politicians.
My vote should be obvious. Regardless of opportunity, we TomCats are very naughty by definition.
There is now a new poll for your consideration.
Here are the results of our Secretary of State poll. Because the respondents were not screened demographically, it is not necessarily representative of they US as a whole. However it contains no internal bias.

And here are your comments on the poll.
Posted by Lynn Squance on December 14, 2012 at 10:43 pm.
Today (or yesterday), Susan Rice withdrew her name from consideration because she felt it was too distracting and there is a lot to get done. Would she like the job, absolutely but she didn’t think the time was right for the country.
According to the news, that leaves John Kerry and McConjob and other Republican/Teabaggers have stated there won’t be a problem confirming him. Of course not because that leaves his senate seat open and Brown has already said he is revving up for the job. But there is another popular Democrat that, should he choose to run in the special election, has a financial advantage as Brown’s war chest is just under $500,000. Want to bet that Adelson and the Kochs take care of that little matter.
As for Bill Clinton, he has the personality for it and all his peccadilloes are out in the open, as far as we know. Not to mention, that as a former president, he has certain knowledge and skills that are useful. I certainly wouldn’t say that of Baby Bush!
It will be interesting to see who is tapped and how easily the confirmation goes.
Posted by SoINeedAName on December 12, 2012 at 8:18 pm. From 69.243.241.x Report Abuse
Rice
She’s more than qualified, and Kerry should stay in the Senate so Brown won’t be elected from Massachusetts.
Posted by mamabear on December 5, 2012 at 6:30 am.
Rice, Kerry needs to stay in the Senate.
Posted by Ditzi Dotti on December 3, 2012 at 10:57 am.
There has been a lot of negative press about Susan Rice lately. She has a huge monetary investment in the Keystone Pipeline. IMO, Bill Clinton can do no wrong.
Posted by Patty on December 2, 2012 at 3:38 pm.
I agree with Marva. Susan Rice should change her first name to Condoleeza Rice and she will breeze through the hearings.
Posted by Angelica on December 2, 2012 at 12:34 pm.
Clinton is mesmerizing and he is friends with leaders that no one in the Bush administration could get close to (Kim Jong Il, was one example). Clinton would be a huge asset for any administration. It ought to go to Kerry. But Clinton would be my first choice.
Posted by Yvonne White on December 1, 2012 at 4:54 pm.
If Obama really wants to get serious, he’s appoint Dennis Kucinich!
OMG Marva, very good suggestion about Rice!
Posted by Angelica in reply to Yvonne White on December 2, 2012 at 12:36 pm.
Dennis Kucinich should run for president in 2016, along with Bernie Sanders. They’d get my vote, that’s certain.
Posted by Marva on December 1, 2012 at 10:54 am.
I’ve suggested Susan change her first name to Condoleeza and the Republicans would be stupid enough to vote for her since all "those" people look alike to them. Of course, she can change it back to Susan and leave them wandering around with glazed looks wondering what happened.
Posted by Patty in reply to Marva on December 2, 2012 at 3:25 pm.
Brilliant idea, Marva!
It was really closer than I expected.
I voted for Bill Clinton, because I think he is the best suited for the role. While Susan Rice was clearly qualified, I had reservations because she tends to be an interventionist, and because she has deep financial ties to the Keystone XL Pipeline. I preferred Kerry to Rice, because he tends to reject intervention in favor of diplomacy. However, he has a lot od seniority that his state will lose, and I prefer not to give Bought Bagger Brown another shot at a Senate seat in a special election with gargantuan funding from Banksters, the Koch brothers, and other Plutocons and criminals.
In the new poll, be honest, because he knows.
In November, traffic here at Politics Plus was slightly down in all major categories, except hits, which was slightly up. Page Views followed the same pattern from last month, confirming the change in the way AW Stats was allocating them. I anticipated this drop in traffic because of post election burnout, as I said last month, so I’m quite pleased with where we are.
Reported period
Month Nov 2012
First visit
01 Nov 2012 – 00:00
Last visit
30 Nov 2012 – 23:56
Unique visitors
Number of visits
Pages
Hits
Bandwidth
Viewed traffic *
15,237
39,075
(2.56 visits/visitor)
193,656
(4.95 Pages/Visit)
589,587
(15.08 Hits/Visit)
12.05 GB
(323.48 KB/Visit)
Not viewed traffic *
351,691
410,898
5.95 GB
The first time someone comes to the site during a month, they are counted as a Unique Visitor and a Visit. Subsequent visits from that person are counted as visits only. Every time someone visits or changes pages that counts as a Page View. Any time a file on the server is accessed, that counts as a Hit. Bandwidth is how much data is transferred from the site. One byte is enough to store one letter of text. 12.05 GB is a little more than 12,050,000,000 bytes.
Not viewed traffic is recorded when people read our blog without coming here, using RSS Readers, such as Feed Demon, and Aggregation sites, such as Google Reader and MyWeb. Combining the two, we still landed eyeballs on over half a million pages last month.
Here are our 2011 stats.

And here are our 2012 stats so you can compare them.

Here is our most recent ClustrMap, last updated on December 1. Note that our map reset on February 28. The largest circles represent over 1,000 visits. The tiniest represent one to ten. I feel thrilled that folks come here from all around the world.

Durations measure how much time people spend here on each visit. The following chart breaks it down by ranges. Our average durations were up an average of 36 seconds per visitor.
Number of visits: 39,075 – Average: 294 s
Number of visits
Percent
0s-30s
31,125
79.6 %
30s-2mn
2,067
5.2 %
2mn-5mn
968
2.4 %
5mn-15mn
1,215
3.1 %
15mn-30mn
828
2.1 %
30mn-1h
1,677
4.2 %
1h+
1,195
3 %
That means that the people who were here paid more attention. It’s a great result!
Here are our top five articles for November.
Jane Smiley: Capitalist Pigs 1/17/2010 1,251 Views
Why Fox Is Banned in Canada 3/07/2011 794 Views
Romney Sued Over Milking Auto Bailout 11/02/2012 666 Views
Election Projection–11/4/2012 11/04/2012 632 Views
Why Robert Murray Fired Workers 11/10/2012 591 Views
None or our articles became viral last month, sadly, but it is interesting to note that we are still getting traffic on items several years old.
Anytime someone comes here by clicking a link on another site, that is a referral. We divide referrals between search engines, other major sites that are not search engines (Care2, Reddit, etc.), and blogs or news sites.
Search engine referrals were down.
18 different referring search engines
Pages
Percent
Hits
Percent
8500
69.3 %
16,169
76.6 %
Stumbleupon (Social Bookmark)
2505
20.4 %
2,637
12.4 %
498
4 %
882
4.1 %
271
2.2 %
595
2.8 %
225
1.8 %
225
1 %
116
0.9 %
274
1.2 %
Yandex
41
0.3 %
106
0.5 %
40
0.3 %
43
0.2 %
Unknown search engines
37
0.3 %
65
0.3 %
8
0 %
8
0 %
Earth Link
4
0 %
4
0 %
4
0 %
7
0 %
4
0 %
5
0 %
3
0 %
17
0 %
MetaCrawler (Metamoteur)
1
0 %
1
0 %
1
0 %
1
0 %
1
0 %
1
0 %
Go.com
65
0.3 %
Our top five non-blog referral sites are:
http://www.care2.com/ 3,189
http://jabberwonk.com/ 1,154
Reddit was way down, but Care2, Jabberwonk, Tumblr, and Current, which made the list for the first time, were up.
Our top 15 blog/news referral sites are:
http://america-weeps.blogspot.com/
http://theleftinme.blogspot.com/
http://frieddogleg.blogspot.com/
http://infidel753.blogspot.com/
http://republic-of-gilead.blogspot.com/
http://reconstitution.us/rcnew/
http://www.buckdogpolitics.blogspot.ca/
http://progressiveerupts.blogspot.com/
http://bildungblog.blogspot.com/
http://www.politicalhotwire.com/
Here’s some linkey-love in return The best ways you can spread the message to others is to use the share button at the bottom of each article to list our articles on the the networking sites where you belong. Quote PP articles on your own blogs also helps. The operative commandment here is “thou shalt steal.” We’re on the same side here, and I encourage it. Even if you want to repost a whole article, that’s OK. Just link back, please. Also, feel free to swipe my graphics in the articles. If they are labeled with our Politics Plus URL, they are my work.
Here are the top fifteen commenters for November. I remembered and copied them off in time. That’s three months in a row! I don’t count, as I’m the resident big mouth, and I try to reply to every comment, except replies directed at someone else. Those who leave their URLs in their comments, also get linkey-love here.
Lynn Squance (189)
Patty (164)
SoINeedAName (53)
Phyllis (50)
Rixar13 (30)
Edith Belcher (26)
Lee Evans (25)
Angelica (24)
GYPSY (23)
mamabear (18)
Pat A (16)
Pat Armstrong (14)
Yvonne White (13)
Lisa Gunther (11)
We have 915,272 links on other websites, an increase of over 250,000.
Our Technorati.rating is up to 140, a slight increase, but still low on the B list. Despite over half a million links, Technorati only recognizes links on sites that have registered at Technorati. Because we had so much traffic on Buzzflash.net, a registered site, we used to be an A list blog. Buzzflash.net is gone and with the slowdown, we’re back to B list. If only Care2 were to register with Technorati, we’d be in fat city, because any article that makes it to Care2’s front page should count. One of Care2’s tech support people contacted me about something else, and I mentioned this to him. He said he’s pass it on, but I’ve heard nothing more.
We have 3,894 articles and 38,025 comments, as of midnight December 1.
I recommend using your own avatar. Go to Gravatar. Sign up using the email address you use to post comments here and upload the image you want to use. Whenever you comment under that email address here or on any WordPress blog (several others too), that image will be your avatar.
Your participation remains a major part of what makes this blog worth reading, not to mention worth writing. Thank you all for all you do, here and elsewhere, to support progressive solutions. Together we are make are difference, and I hope I can keep my own participation up sufficiently to be worthy of you.
We are still well under the traffic we had a year ago. That’s only partially because I’m posting a little less than I did then to take better care of myself. The big reason we’re down is still that many of the tools I used to publicize our articles are no longer available. That makes your help that much more important.
I could not be more pleased with the role we played in the last election. Of course we were not responsible for Obama’s victory or our gains in both the Santé and the House. Nevertheless, we did out part, and along with thousands of other activists like us, we helped change the direction of this country.
Nevertheless, our nation still faces a severe infestation of InsaniTEA. Republicans are still plotting how to place America in thrall to a permanent regime of Republican one party rule, in which elections no longer matter. Our work has just begun.

This is Nameless fifth Big Mouth Award, having won last September 2010, last May 2011, July 2011 and August 2011. He isn’t a blogger, so you can’t follow him home, but he comments almost daily here. He is the kind of participant that every blogger dreams of having, because instead of just stating opinions (which is fine in itself), he adds to the content of my articles with many useful links. I even receive comments about his contributions on other sites where I share our articles.
Please join me in thanking and congratulating Nameless!
Here are the results of our Thanksgiving Dinner Poll. While the respondents were not demographically balanced to be representative of national culinary tastes, the poll contained no internal bias, and is therefore gastronomically correct for Politics Plus readers.

And here are your comments.
Posted by SoINeedAName on November 27, 2012 at 8:29 pm.
Late to this, but we had turkey AND ham – both were DELICIOUS!
(But to be honest, as a "foodie", the potatoes, stuffing, gravy, and creamed peas left a LOT to be desired.)
Posted by Marva on November 21, 2012 at 1:58 pm.
I voted twice since we’ll be having both turkey and ham. It just worked out that way.
As for cat food, it’s far more expensive than cheap tuna for humans. At least my picky cat demands the more expensive good.
Posted by Jerry Critter on November 21, 2012 at 12:23 pm.
My dinner will be vegan, but we are having dinner at one of our sons home and there will be turkey with all of the trimmings served.
Posted by Lynn Squance on November 19, 2012 at 4:09 pm.
Tuna sandwich and raw veggies! Of course I had turkey at Canadian Thanksgiving and am very fond of turkey. I think that is why people frequently call me a turkey!
Had I been able to take my mother out for dinner, we may have had turkey for dinner, but alas, she is sick.
Posted by James on November 18, 2012 at 4:25 pm.
On moving to Mazatlan, we decided to ditch the turkey in favor of more local fare – a combination lobster and shrimp plate, yummm.
Posted by Angelica on November 16, 2012 at 8:39 pm.
I am vegan, but we’re having company. It bothers my conscience to serve turkey.
Posted by Patty on November 16, 2012 at 3:15 pm.
I’m making turkey. It’s going to be a small one. There will only be Shane, his Mom and myself. He will help me in the kitchen a lot.
As for me, I’m the TomCat, so of course I had bird! I’m surprised that ham did worse than cat food. There is now a new poll for you. Enjoy!
Here are the results of our Presidential Preference Poll. It is not authoritative, because the demographics of Politics Plus readers and visitors are not filtered to conform to national demographics. Nevertheless, the poll contained no internal bias.

And here are your comments.
Posted by Patty on November 7, 2012 at 9:48 am.
Looks like the Nation followed us here.
Posted by Terrie W. on November 6, 2012 at 12:17 pm.
I and my husband voted on the first day of early voting in my state (22nd) and we both voted for President Obama and Veep Joe Biden! They need 4 more years to really get us forward. A vote for the other two fools is a vote for Fascism. Don’t know what that is? Use your brain cells and look it up!
Posted by Tabitha125 on November 6, 2012 at 11:37 am.
I voted for Obama again cause he did something for my family! My kids can stay on our insurance till they are 26 yrs old. We need 4 more years of moving forward and i know he can do it..
Posted by Tom Harmon on November 4, 2012 at 1:40 pm.
I early voted in Ohio, and I voted for my democratic president Barrack Obama, I support him totally and so did my wife.
Posted by Angelica on November 4, 2012 at 8:37 am.
I proudly voted for Obama on Friday morning. It was a great day.
Posted by Patty on November 2, 2012 at 4:23 am.
My vote is going to Barack Obama and Joe Biden on Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012. My House and Senate votes will be for the Democrat also.
Kirsten Gillibrand is seeking re-election in the Senate and a newcomber named Dan Lamb is running for the newly re-districted seat against the RepublicanT Richard Hanna. He voted party line his last 2 years in my old district and we want him gone like the wind.
Posted by Lynn Squance on November 1, 2012 at 3:14 am.
Perhaps you should allow all Canadians to vote. With 66% voting for Mr Obama, 71% of women, that would be good! Ne c’est pas!?!
Posted by John Dasef in reply to Lynn Squance on November 1, 2012 at 1:26 pm.
That would be very good indeed, but might require reciprocation in kind. I don’t think you’d want the baggers voting in your election.
Posted by Rixar13@verizon.net on October 31, 2012 at 5:44 pm.
Already voted for Obama, wife too…
I’ll let you guess how I voted, as if you don’t know. I found it interesting that our foreign participants outperformed our US ones, since none of them were sufficiently depraved to support Lord Willard.
Our new poll is exceptionally critical. Vote Now.
