TomCat

Sep 082013
 

A lot of people are saying that, when the fascist five Injustices of SCROTUS (Republican judicial VD) gutted the Voting Rights Act, it is not a big deal, because both individuals and DOJ can sue under other sections of the act.  In Texas, there is a lawsuit that the Texas redistricting plan is racist.  All the population growth comes from the Latino community, but all the new House seats are comfortably Gerrymandered for white candidates.  DOJ has also stated an intent to sue, but here is why that still isn’t good enough.

8Voting

A federal court said Friday it will not delay Texas’ primary elections and ordered the state to use political maps drawn by the Legislature – but only temporarily, while the judges sort out a complex and possibly precedent-setting lawsuit.

The three-judge panel in San Antonio gave both sides in the lawsuit over Texas’ voting maps reason to claim victory. The court will not draw its own map for the 2014 elections, as civil rights groups wanted, but it also did not throw out the lawsuit completely, as Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott requested.

The court order, signed by all three judges, also allows the civil rights and minority groups to argue that all changes to Texas election law should be reviewed by federal authorities before they can be implemented. The Justice Department has sought to intervene in the case after a recent Supreme Court decision requiring Congress to make changes to the Voting Rights Act.

The fundamental issue of the lawsuit, filed in 2011, is whether the Legislature illegally drew political maps that intentionally diminish the voting power of minorities in Texas. Abbott’s office has argued in court papers that Republicans who control the Legislature drew maps to boost the chances of their party – which is legal – and that if minorities who vote predominantly Democratic are hurt as a result, that does not constitute a civil rights violation… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Huffington Post>

Section 4, was the section that required preapproval of changes to voting in states, like Texas, with a history of racism.  Without the requirement of preapproval, the lawsuits under other sections can get tied up in the courts for racist Republican tactics to remain legal long enough to steal elections, and win another majority in the House with a minority of the popular vote.

Share
Sep 082013
 

I’m writing for tomorrow, day 86, the last moderately cool day before another murderous hot spell.  I’m a bit tired as I did defrost the freezer yesterday.  Tomorrow is a holy day in the Church of the Ellipsoid Orb.  My meditation will be less intense than usual, because the Denver congregation already meditated so well.  Next week will be a very busy one.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:16 (average 4:38).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From The New Yorker: Hopes for a positive G20 summit crumbled today as President Obama blurted to Russia’s Vladimir Putin at a joint press appearance, “Everyone here thinks you’re a jackass.”

The press corps appeared stunned by the uncharacteristic outburst from Mr. Obama, who then unleashed a ten-minute tirade at the stone-faced Russian President.

“Look, I’m not just talking about Snowden and Syria,” Mr. Obama said. “What about Pussy Riot? What about your anti-gay laws? Total jackass moves, my friend.”

Of course this is satire, but it would have been grand!!!!

From NY Times: President Obama raced home on Friday to confront one of the biggest tests of his presidency as he ramped up a campaign to persuade Congress to support airstrikes against Syria that many world leaders he had consulted declined to back.

After two days of tense discussions, including a dinner debate that went into the morning hours, Mr. Obama left without forging an international consensus behind military action as other leaders urged him not to attack without United Nations permission. But he won agreement from some allies on blaming Syria’s government for a chemical weapons attack and on endorsing an unspecified response.

As long as Russia’s version of the Republican Party, and Fuhrer Putin, are at the helm in Russia, Obama will not get UN support. Still, ne needs much broader international support than GW ChickenHawk’s Coalition of the Bought.

From Alternet: …Former Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko declared in April that he believes  every single nuclear power plant operating in the nation should be shut down, starting with the riskiest…

In a word, AMEN!

Cartoon:

8Cartoon

Major mistake!

Share
Sep 072013
 

When Republicans want support for their travesty de jour, they attribute it to the patron saint of the Republican Party, St. Ronnie Ray Gun.  St Ronnie wore a white hat, rode a white horse, and could do no wrong.  That St. Ronnie may have been or done the exact opposite, matters not, because they have the Republican Reichsministry of Propaganda, Faux Noise, to parrot their lies.  Now they are claiming how St. Ronnie would NEVER gave allowed chemical weapons use.

7rumsfeld-husseinA top Republican lawmaker on Thursday invoked Ronald Reagan to say that Obama was weak for not acting more directly in response to Syria’s alleged use of chemical weapons, ignoring the fact that Reagan’s White House looked the other way when chemical weapons were used in the 1980s.

Former House Foreign Affairs Committee chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) appeared on Fox News arguing for a military response to the Syrian government’s alleged use of chemical weapons on civilians. While pushing the same limited strikes plan that the Obama administration wants, Ros-Leithein attacked the president for not moving more forcefully against Damascus. In doing so, she told Fox that Reagan never would have stood for the sort of attack that killed an estimated 1,400 civilians

…What Ros-Lehtinen seems oddly unaware of, however, is that Ronald Reagan did exactly the opposite. For the majority of the 1980s, Iraq under Sadaam Hussein was locked in combat with the Islamic Republic of Iran in a war that killed more than 1,000,000 people on both sides. The United States explicitly backed the secular Hussein over the Ayatollah Khomeini’s government in Tehran, still smarting from the embassy hostage crisis that had only ended when Reagan took office. That backing not only included the shipment of tons of weapons to support Baghdad, but also looking the other way when Iraq unleashed its chemical weapons stockpiles — including sarin and mustard gas — against Iranian civilians and soldiers alike… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

That’s not all Republicans in the Reagan administration actually sold Saddam the components for chemical and biological weapons and instructed the Iraqi military in their use.  Lawrence O’Donnell has the story.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

As much as Republicans try to claim the moral high ground on this issue, the bottom line is this.  Republicans, led by their patron saint, are so morally bankrupt that they were responsible for Saddam’s use of chemical weapons.  They have no room to talk about Obama’s dilemma.

Share

Bernie Si! Koch Suckers No!

 Posted by at 1:49 am  Politics
Sep 072013
 

The Koch Brothers, and many of the other billionaires, who are the only people Republicans truly represent, hate Social Security.  The problem is that, as Americans, you pay premiums throughout your working lives, and, upon retirement or disability, the money comes back to you in benefits.  The Koch Brothers, and their Republican servants want your benefits to come back to them, not you.  Enter our national treasure, Bernie Sanders.

7BernieImagine how great this country would be, if every lawmaker had just half of the courage, integrity, and intelligence of Senator Bernie Sanders. I’ve grown to vey much love this Independent lawmaker from Vermont. He has no problem taking on and exposing the most corrupt individuals and organizations positioned in America today. In this video from June 2011, Sanders takes on the infamous and all too powerful Koch Brothers…

Inserted from <Daily Kos>

Here’s the video:

Kudos to Bernie! Don’t let Koch suckers take our Social Security. The solution is still to scrap the cap! Here’s a list of products to boycott from the same article.

THE KOCH BROTHERS

ADI-Pure ®

Antron ®

Brawny brand paper towels and other products;

Chemical products including: •Sure Sol ® products

Comforel® fiberfill

CoolMax ®

Cordura ® fabric

DACRON ®

DBE ® dibasic esters

Delica ®

Demak’Up ®

Dixie® Brand cups plates, and other products;

European brands: •Colhogar ®

Georgia-Pacific lumber and paper products;

Inversoft ®

Kitten Soft ®

Koch Agricultural – Operates cattle ranches

Koch Fertilizers

Lotus ®

Man-made fabrics and fibers including: •LYCRA ®

Mardi Gras brand paper goods;

Matador Ranch – Hunting ranch.

Moltonel ®

Northern brand toilet paper;

Nouvelle ®

Okay

Oxyclear ™

Performa ®

Polarguard ®

Polyclear ®

Polyshield ®

Soft-n-Gentle® brand toilet paper;

SolarMax ®

Somerelle ® Bedding

Sparkle brand paper goods;

Sparkle brand paper napkins;

Stainmaster® carpet and fabric care products;

Supplex ® Fabric

Tactel®

Tactesse ® Carpet Fibers

Tenderly ®

Terathane

Thermolite ®

Tutto ®

Vanity Fair brand paper napkins;

Zee brand paper goods

More products listed via Wikipedia: Koch Industries

Click through for petitions.

Share
Sep 072013
 

I’m writing for tomorrow, day 85, and enjoying the cool weather, while it lasts.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 4:17 (average 4:55).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From Upworthy (Hat-Tip to Pat A from Care2): When you’ve got giant energy companies this scared, you must be doing something right. At 3:38, I snorted. Just sayin’. And at 4:43, he explains brilliantly what’s in it for you.

 

Kudos to the people of Boulder, CO, and down with the Koch sucking polluters!

From CREW: On August 23, 2013, U.S. District Court Judge John Bates handed CREW a major victory in CREW v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice (D.D.C.), in which CREW sued the Department of Justice (DOJ) for documents related to the now-closed investigation of former Senator John Ensign (R-NV).  Sen. Ensign had publicly acknowledged he was the subject of a criminal investigation for efforts to cover up his affair with a former campaign staffer then married to his chief of staff.  A special counsel hired by the Senate Select Committee on Ethics had issued a report finding the senator’s conduct appeared to violate numerous federal laws, and there was widespread media coverage of the scandal.

The ethics committee referred the case to DOJ for a further investigation, but the department declined to prosecute Sen. Ensign, instead prosecuting only the former chief of staff, Doug Hampton.  DOJ refused to provide any records, claiming Sen. Ensign’s privacy interests trumped the public’s right to know.  Ludicrously, DOJ claimed Sen. Ensign’s privacy interests were so great the agency needed to protect even the mere fact of the investigation, notwithstanding Sen. Ensign’s public comments about the criminal case and the significant media coverage.

Accepting CREW’s arguments, Judge Bates found Sen. Ensign’s privacy interests were outweighed by the substantial public interest in records that would shed light on the DOJ investigation and the decision not to bring charges against the senator.  As the court explained, “CREW wants records showing what efforts DOJ took to investigate serious allegations of criminal conduct backed by ‘substantial credible evidence.’”  Given Sen. Ensign’s status as “a high ranking and high profile elected official who resigned following accusations of significant public corruption,” the court concluded the substantial public interest outweighs Sen. Ensign’s privacy interests.

Kudos to CREW. Ensign was one of the pseudo-Christian C-Street Republicans who helped their Ugandan counterparts draft the law condemning gays to death.

From NY Times: In July, when news broke that President Obama might nominate Lawrence Summers to be the next chairman of the Federal Reserve, several Democratic senators wrote a letter to the president in praise of Janet Yellen, the current Fed vice chairwoman who many presumed would be the nominee. The letter didn’t mention Mr. Summers; rather, it recounted Ms. Yellen’s formidable qualifications and urged the president to nominate her. Perhaps it was too subtle.

Mr. Obama is expected to announce his nominee soon, and, by all accounts, Mr. Summers is still a contender. It is time for senators of both parties who appreciate the importance of this nomination to tell the president that Mr. Summers would be the wrong choice.

America would have been far better off for Obama to have kept the progressive economic team that advised him through the 2008 campaign and helped him win the White House, instead of adopting Hillary’s advisors, including Larry ‘Wrong Way’ Summers, one of the infamous Three Blind Mice. Tell him not to make that mistake again!

Cartoon:

7Cartoon

Share

How I Would Vote on Syria

 Posted by at 12:40 am  Editorial, Politics
Sep 062013
 

TCCCTo a large extent, I’ve been talking about Syria in both pros and cons, but have not committed myself one way or the other.  That is because, I consider the issue far too important for a knee-jerk response, a practice that has been all too common across the political spectrum.  I have carefully considered both sides of the issue and am now prepared to take a position, with the caveat that I have no disrespect for those who choose the opposite position, as long as they did their homework before doing so.

It is wrong to conflate Syria with Iraq and Afghanistan.  We entered Afghanistan as a Republican attempt to wrest control of the Caucuses gas fields from Gazprom, the Russian natural gas company, by running a pipeline from the Caspian Sea, through Afghanistan, to Karachi, Pakistan. Bush even installed a pipeline expert working for Unocal, Hamid Karzai, as Afghanistan’s puppet President.  We entered Iraq as a Republican attempt to carve up their oil fields for Big Oil and establish a major military base outside of Saudi Arabia.  Both of these incursions were intended as conquests.  Both were carried out with Republican levels of competence.  Both failed.  This is not the case with Syria, in which the action  is intended to be short-term airstrikes only, with no boots on the ground.

The intelligence appears valid, as even most opponents agree.  Among the few who do not are Putin, WND, and Rusk Limbarf.  When those three agree, you can be virtually certain that the opposite is true.

Ideally, the attack is intended to do so much damage to Assad’s chemical weapons capability, that it will seriously degrade his ability to use them, and to take out so much of his command and control infrastructure, that he will fear our response should he use them again.  If it works, it could save a lot of Syrian lives, and lives in other countries where leaders may consider using chemical weapons.

Here’s the rub.  Now that Obama has announced his intentions, Assad has dispersed his chemical weapons and delivery systems into heavily populated areas, making them more difficult to destroy and increasing the collateral damage of any attempt to destroy them.  Obama would have been better served to get authorization from Congress in secret and attack without prior publicity.  Regardless, civilian casualties are likely to be high.

Another downside is that, if we bomb Syria, and Assad turns around and uses chemical weapons again, then what?  We are forced to either escalate or appear impotent.  That’s a lose-lose scenario.

I have tried to weigh the upsides and downsides to determine which way would save more lives.  In the final analysis, I just don’t know.  I  tend to distrust anyone who claims to know, because, in the fog of war, the best of plans become instant chaos.

So, which ever option I choose, it is as likely that I will be wrong, as it is that I will be right.  Given a situation, where I can so easily be wrong, that if I am, I choose to err on the side of peace.  I would vote No.

Share
Sep 062013
 

RepublicansOnParade

Here is the twenty-fourth article in our Republicans on Parade series, featuring individuals who personify what the Republican Party has become. Today’s honoree is White Student Union Fuhrer, Matthew Heimback. He is being honored, because he so perfectly illustrates the Republican views of race relations and accepting the will of the people.

6HeimbachA little over a year ago, Matthew Heimbach was annoying fellow students at Towson University with juvenile stunts like chalking “White Pride” and “White Guilt is Over” on sidewalks of the Maryland campus.

But in the last few months, since graduating at the end of the spring semester, Heimbach has been turning into a full-fledged neo-Nazi. No longer content with softer groups like the White Student Union that he started at Towson, Heimbach now rails about “conniving Jews,” goes on talk shows like that hosted by neo-Nazi David Duke, approvingly quotes terrorist assassin David Lane, wears a pistol when addressing a leading racist group, and calls for violent revolution.

“Revolution is the only answer to our plight,” Heimbach wrote in a post today on the Traditionalist Youth Network (TYN), an umbrella group he formed this spring with Indiana native Matthew Parrot and which now includes the White Student Union. “Our ancestors fought against the scabs, bosses, capitalists and Jews to make a better future for their children. Now we must do the same.”

In the same post, Heimbach said that “the Left has spent generations attempting to ‘help’ the worker by dancing to the tune of the Jewish elites.” Like Christ, he said, “we must … drive out the moneylenders and traitors in our midst.”

In an August post on the same site, Heimbach openly acknowledged a long-time interest in national socialism, fascism and white pride movements. He credited the Stormfront website, run by former Alabama Klan leader Don Black, as “crucial” to his own development as an activist. “[T]he time is right, and Trad Youth is here to be the vanguard of the youth movement for our folk. … While victory is a long way away and will be paved with blood, sweat, tears, and martyrs, we truly now have a chance to not only restore our race and our Tradition, but to become triumphant.”… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <SPLC>

Here’s a report about him from the bastion of Republican bias, CNN.

In typical Republican fashion, he starts with lies, and uses them as the basis for the rest of his racist dogma.

Now, of course there will be those, like the subject of the 22nd Republicans on Parade article, that Heimback isn’t really a Republican.  Horse Feathers!  He was involved with the Republican Party, attends CPAC, aka CPUKE, and even headed his college chapter of Young Americans for Freedom!  It doesn’t get more Republican than this self-proclaimed Nazi!

Share
Sep 062013
 

Writing for tomorrow, day 84, I’ll make a place for tonight’s holy meditation, so I can plug in the results before I post it.  I was taking a shower in the wee hours last night, and I heard a sound so unfamiliar that it took me a few minutes to figure out what it was.  It was the sound of rain coming down and landing in the breezeway.  This is the first time I have heard this sound since April.  I’ll have a couple of nice cool days, but another horrid heat wave is on the way.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today’s took me 3:58 (average 5:29).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Religious Ecstasy:

0905-Btomcos49-Ravens27

Woooo Hoooo!!

Short Takes:

From Raw Story (Hat-Tip to Carrie from Care2): Lawyers for a Florida man this week cited President George W. Bush’s pre-emptive war in Iraq and the “Bush Doctrine” as a defense after their client killed two neighbors and attempted to kill a third on Labor Day.

Florida Today reported on Wednesday that attorney’s for William T. Woodward had filed a motion asking for charges against him to be dismissed under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law, which says that gun owners do not have a duty to retreat in the face of an “imminent” threat.

 

Now that’s one DUMB Republican!  It made as much sense as when Bush used it.

From The New Yorker: Aides to President Obama said today that he was “visibly shaken” after receiving support from House Speaker John Boehner for his Syria campaign, adding that the Speaker’s vote of confidence was “making him rethink the whole thing.”

An aide to Mr. Obama, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that he was in the Oval Office with the President when he got the call from Mr. Boehner: “As it became clear that Boehner was going to support him on this, he looked more and more stunned. He was trying to stay calm and all but you could see that he was really taken aback.”

After putting down the phone with Mr. Boehner, the President reportedly told aides, “Boehner’s supporting it. That’s so weird. This is still a good idea, right?”

If Agent Orange supports it, it MUST me a mistake!

From NY Times: …Low-income residents of Texas and Florida desperately need health insurance, as shown by the Census Bureau’s Small Area Health Insurance Estimates for 2011, which were issued last week. The report found that more than 25 percent of the population in Texas under age 65 (5.7 million people) was uninsured, the highest rate in the nation. Florida was a close second, with just under 25 percent uninsured (3.8 million people). Massachusetts, whose pioneering reforms were the template for the federal reform law, led all 50 states and the District of Columbia with only 4.9 percent uninsured.

In Texas, Gov. Rick Perry and Republican legislators have strongly opposed the Medicaid expansion and refused to establish a state-run exchange, the smoothest way to coordinate state and federal programs and provide subsidies to middle-income residents. They contend that the state has other ways to deal with the uninsured, but there’s little reason to believe them given the state’s long history of failing to help and persistent complaints from medical and patient advocacy groups.

Florida has also declined to expand its Medicaid program or establish its own state-run exchange. Worse yet, it seems to be trying to make sure that the exchange that will be set up by the federal government is a failure. A few months ago, the Republican-dominated Legislature passed and the Republican governor, Rick Scott, signed a bill that strips the state insurance commissioner of formidable powers to regulate insurance premiums. Previously, insurance companies had to get state approval for rates for new plans; the commissioner could negotiate with the companies for lower rates and reject rates he deemed too high. Those powers have now been suspended for two years, the crucial start-up period for the new exchange.

What kind of State government actually tries to ensure that Big Insurance gets to shaft their constituents in premiums? There is only one appropriate word to describe such betrayal: Republican!

Cartoon:

6Cartoon

Tired of being the victims of religious oppression, they chose to become the perpetrators instead.

Share