

I’m rushing to get as much done as I can, before leaving for PT with Courtney.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:00 (average 4:58). To do it. click here. How did you do?
Short Takes:
From Daily Kos: Rock & Roll Hall of Famer Joe Walsh thought he was scheduled to play a benefit concert for American veterans and their families. He later found out the event is actually part of the Republican National Convention and is refusing to play:
Kudos to Joe Walsh. I'm including this instead of Prince, because his tragic death already crowding most other content from most media.
From Media Matters: Fox News host Steve Doocy couldn't find a single person to support his claim that many are "wondering" whether the U.S. Treasury Department is "pandering to the PC police" by adding Harriet Tubman to the front of the $20 bill, and moving former President Andrew Jackson to the back. While several right-wing pundits criticized the move as "Democrats using our currency as a political weapon to pander to their constituents," New Yorkers told Doocy "it's a great idea to put a woman on the currency," and "it's probably time to get rid of Andrew Jackson."
Since Faux Noise had just made a big stink over this, Doocy's failure has to be embarrassing for the Republican Reichsministry of Propaganda. This os clearly Republican racism, considering that Andy Jackson was the founder of the Democratic Party.
From Alternet: If you’re following the election, you’re probably aware that the Republican National Convention is swiftly approaching or as 'Late Show" host Stephen Colbert puts it, “The toboggan ride is rapidly approaching the oak tree.”
Seeing Reince go up in flames is a good thing for America.
Cartoon:

If you've red me for a while, you already know this, but for those who don’t, there are two Reichs in American politics. The Reich on the right is the Republican Reich, They are virtually always wrong. The Reich on the left is Robert Reich. He is virtually always right. Today I learned that he has the exact same advice for Democrats that I had yesterday. The Reich on the left knows best!
Bernie Sanders supporter Robert Reich takes to Facebook to argue that whatever the result of the Democratic primaries, either candidate is better than electing a Republican. No Donald Trump or Ted Cruz in the White House, no thank you.
I have to agree. Ours is a Sanders household — our kids, 17, 13, and 12, are emphatically Bernie supporters, though Driftglass and I have emphatically stated to them and on our podcast that we will "Vote Blue No Matter Who." And thankfully the Illinois primary is over, so our phone is not ringing constantly with pleas for votes. The 17-year-old voted in the primary because Illinois law allowed him to do so, as he will be 18 on Election Day.
We also remember what disunity cost us in 1980. I was a Kennedy '80 volunteer (yes, actively working against a sitting Democratic president! Good times?) And Driftglass voted for John Anderson in the general election. We got eight years of Ronald Wilson Reagan for our trouble. It cost us. It cost gay citizens. It cost unionized workers. Iran-Contra. Tax cuts for billionaires. Ignoring AIDS for years. And it was the start of the plutocracy we live under today.
Yes, there was a lot to dislike about Jimmy Carter in 1980. But in 20-20 hindsight we'd go back and change our votes in a heartbeat. I have nothing but regret about that election.
And there are reasons each candidate this time has supporters and detractors. But the distance we will go backwards, on LGBT rights, women's rights, voting rights, etc. with a Republican president? Not to mention three more Antonin Scalias on the Supreme Court? None of us wants to go there… [emphasis added]
Inserted from <Crooks and Liars>
I’m 100% Bernie Sanders and will vote for him in the Oregon Primary in May. But if Hillary wins the nomination I will become 100% Hillary Clinton. Why so enthusiastic? I’m 1,000,000,000% against whatever would be dictator the Clown Car Convention barfs into their nomination. You need to be too.
I slept very poorly last night. I had a lot on my mind. I scheduled my visit with Casey Eye Institute on 5/9. Dr. Skalet is an Ocular Oncologist, and she deals exclusively with eye cancer. Megan’s office called. they want me to get an MRI on my hands and see a Rheumatoid Arthritis Specialist. One might think I already had enough on my plate. Then, just as I was about to go to bed, my ISP went down. I don’t know why, but every time I dozed off, I woke up again and felt compelled to see, if I was reconnected. That went on until my Internet came back early this morning. Tomorrow I have PT with Courtney. Rain is forecast, so I have to take the lift bus. I may have no more than a Personal Update.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:04 (average 4:54). To do it click here. How did you do?
Short Takes:
From Daily Kos: Chris Sevier is suing the Harris County, Texas district clerk, Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton for not allowing him the right to marry his Mac laptop. He’s going to have to get in line for Mr. Paxton, who is busy trying to dodge fraud charges. Why would you want to marry your laptop?
He is trying to prove that, essentially, marriage between a same-sex couple can be equated to marriage between a man and a machine. He is trying to prove that, under Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage, people are now allowed to do morally disgusting things like marry whomever they are attracted to, whether that be inanimate objects or the same gender. Essentially, he is trying to give courts an ultimatum: Agree that this is what they have done and allow him to make vows to a piece of expensive chrome, or, realize that this is morally wrong and undo Obergefell.
It’s interesting that the only people every trying to marry things that are not human—the slippery slope so often referred to by conservatives everywhere—are conservatives themselves.
Dang!! Only a total pervert would want to marry his Mac!
Any real red-blooded straight American would only marry a laptop running Windows!! ![]()
From NY Times: Curt Schilling, a former All-Star pitcher and one of the highest-profile baseball analysts on ESPN, was fired from the network Wednesday, a day after he drew intense criticism for promoting offensive commentary on social media.
Schilling, who had worked for the network since 2010 and most recently offered analysis on “Monday Night Baseball,” was dismissed after sharing a Facebook post this week that appeared to respond to the North Carolina law that bars transgender people from using bathrooms and locker rooms that do not correspond with their birth genders.
The post showed an overweight man wearing a wig and women’s clothing with parts of the T-shirt cut out to expose his breasts. It says: “LET HIM IN! to the restroom with your daughter or else you’re a narrow-minded, judgmental, unloving racist bigot who needs to die.”
To that, Schilling added: “A man is a man no matter what they call themselves. I don’t care what they are, who they sleep with, men’s room was designed for the penis, women’s not so much. Now you need laws telling us differently? Pathetic.”
Kudos to ESPN!!
From Alternet: Wednesday night, Stephen Colbert opened a segment on the New York primary with these words: "Speaking of things money can buy, the 2016 election."
He thrashed the TRUSed Uranus quite well!
Cartoon:

For me to take use a Republican’s opinion as an illustration of a view, with which I agree, is a highly rare occurrence. Usually the exact opposite is true, since virtually everything Republican politicians and pundits say and do is worthy of contempt, outrage, or ridicule. However, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) has actually said something valid.
Rep. Steve King (R-IA), who has endorsed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), said on Tuesday that the Republican party could split if Cruz wins the presidential nomination over Donald Trump on the second ballot at the July convention.
"If the establishment comes in and tries to amend the rules to disadvantage either of those top two candidates or to advantage either one of those top two candidates, I think that there could be chaos erupt [sic] in Cleveland. And the result of that could be a party that could be split," King said on the "Frankly Speaking" radio show, according to audio posted by Buzzfeed News.
He then said that the greatest risk to the party would be a Cruz win at a contested convention.
"The greater risk for the split of the party, though, would be if say we get to convention, nobody’s got the 1,237 and on a subsequent ballot, a second or subsequent ballot, if Ted Cruz wins the nomination –– which I would predict if there’s a second or subsequent ballot — and if Donald Trump decides to say, take his ball and go home, or go run on an independent ticket, that would be what would split the party," King said… [emphasis added]
Inserted from <TPM>
He’s right. At this point, there is no doubt that Fecal Dump Trump is the choice of Republican primary voters, One of three things will happen. Trump will win the nomination, Republican Party hacks will steal the nomination for the TRUSed Uranus Cruz, or Republican Party hacks will steal the nomination for someone with even less success in the primaries and caucuses.
If Cruz or someone else gets the Republican nomination through election theft, King’s predication will come to pass. Furthermore, they will lose all pretense of credibility, like the Democrats did in 1968, when Hubert Humphrey was handed the nomination with less that 175,000 popular votes to Gene McCarthy’s 2,900,000. With the Republican base angry over being disenfranchised most will not support and/or vote for the sham nominee. That is a huge plus for us.
On the other hand, if Fecal Dump Trump does get the nomination, establishment Republicans and pseudo-Christians, who favor the TRUSed Uranus, will not support and/or vote for Trump, That is also a huge plus for us.
So no matter what happens, a lot of Republicans will be staying home, and Democrats should reap the benefits way down the ballot, as long as we don’t shoot ourselves in the foot. With Bernie’s and Hillary’s campaigns and followers acting more and more acrimonious to each other, there is a danger that a lot of Democrats may get ruffled feathers and stay home, squandering the advantage gained from Republican incompetence. Both campaigns need to tone down the attacks.
Julie just left. and I am a pleased and pristine puddy tat. She also gets a lot more done than Lu used to, so I’m thrilled with her. I have a grocery delivery coping this afternoon, so I’ll get to put everything away. It’s another hot muggy day, not at all normal for April in Oregon, where April showers bring May rain.
Cartoon:
Today’s took me 3:06 (average 4:58), To do it, click here. How did you do?
Short Takes:
From Real Clear Politics:
|
State |
Date ▾ |
Delegates |
Clinton |
Sanders |
Delegate Allocation |
Open/ Closed |
|
(2,382 Needed to Win) |
– |
4763 |
1930 |
1189 |
– |
– |
|
Delegates Won |
– |
4051 |
1428 |
1151 |
|
|
|
Superdelegates |
– |
(712) |
502 |
38 |
|
|
|
District of Columbia |
June 14 |
20 (25) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
California |
June 7 |
475 (71) |
|
|
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Montana |
June 7 |
21 (6) |
|
|
Primary |
Open |
|
New Jersey |
June 7 |
126 (16) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
North Dakota |
June 7 |
18 (5) |
|
|
Primary |
Open |
|
New Mexico |
June 7 |
34 (9) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
South Dakota |
June 7 |
20 (5) |
|
|
Primary |
Semi-open |
|
Puerto Rico |
June 5 |
60 (7) |
|
|
Primary |
Open |
|
Virgin Islands |
June 4 |
7 (5) |
|
|
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Oregon |
May 17 |
61 (13) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
Kentucky |
May 17 |
55 (5) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
West Virginia |
May 10 |
29 (8) |
|
|
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Guam |
May 7 |
7 (5) |
|
|
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Indiana |
May 3 |
83 (9) |
|
|
Primary |
Open |
|
Rhode Island |
April 26 |
24 (9) |
|
|
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Pennsylvania |
April 26 |
189 (21) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
Delaware |
April 26 |
21 (10) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
Connecticut |
April 26 |
55 (15) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
Maryland |
April 26 |
95 (23) |
|
|
Primary |
Closed |
|
New York |
April 19 |
247 (44) |
139 |
106 |
Primary |
Closed |
|
Wyoming |
April 9 |
14 (4) |
7 |
7 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Wisconsin |
April 5 |
86 (10) |
38 |
48 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Washington |
March 26 |
101 (17) |
9 |
25 |
Caucus |
Open |
|
Hawaii |
March 26 |
25 (9) |
8 |
17 |
Caucus |
Semi-closed |
|
Alaska |
March 26 |
16 (4) |
3 |
13 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Utah |
March 22 |
33 (4) |
6 |
27 |
Caucus |
Semi-open |
|
Idaho |
March 22 |
23 (4) |
5 |
18 |
Caucus |
Open |
|
Arizona |
March 22 |
75 (10) |
42 |
33 |
Primary |
Closed |
|
Ohio |
March 15 |
143 (16) |
81 |
62 |
Primary |
Semi-open |
|
North Carolina |
March 15 |
107 (14) |
59 |
45 |
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Missouri |
March 15 |
71 (13) |
36 |
35 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Illinois |
March 15 |
156 (26) |
79 |
77 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Florida |
March 15 |
214 (32) |
141 |
73 |
Primary |
Closed |
|
Northern Marianas |
March 12 |
6 (5) |
4 |
2 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Michigan |
March 8 |
130 (17) |
63 |
67 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Mississippi |
March 8 |
36 (5) |
32 |
4 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Maine |
March 6 |
25 (5) |
9 |
16 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Kansas |
March 5 |
33 (4) |
10 |
23 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Nebraska |
March 5 |
25 (5) |
10 |
15 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Louisiana |
March 5 |
51 (8) |
37 |
14 |
Primary |
Closed |
|
Virginia |
March 1 |
95 (15) |
62 |
33 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Vermont |
March 1 |
16 (10) |
0 |
16 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Texas |
March 1 |
222 (30) |
147 |
75 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Tennessee |
March 1 |
67 (9) |
44 |
23 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Oklahoma |
March 1 |
38 (4) |
17 |
21 |
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Minnesota |
March 1 |
77 (16) |
31 |
46 |
Caucus |
Open |
|
Massachusetts |
March 1 |
91 (25) |
46 |
45 |
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Georgia |
March 1 |
102 (14) |
73 |
29 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Democrats Abroad |
March 1-8 |
13 (4) |
4 |
9 |
Primary |
Closed |
|
Colorado |
March 1 |
66 (13) |
25 |
41 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Arkansas |
March 1 |
32 (5) |
22 |
10 |
Primary |
Open |
|
American Samoa |
March 1 |
6 (4) |
4 |
2 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
Alabama |
March 1 |
53 (7) |
44 |
9 |
Primary |
Open |
|
South Carolina |
February 27 |
53 (6) |
39 |
14 |
Primary |
Open |
|
Nevada |
February 20 |
35 (8) |
20 |
15 |
Caucus |
Closed |
|
New Hampshire |
February 9 |
24 (8) |
9 |
15 |
Primary |
Semi-closed |
|
Iowa |
February 1 |
44 (8) |
23 |
21 |
Caucus |
Semi-open |
In New York, Hollary posted an impressive 15 point spread. To win, Bernie needs 1193 more delegates. Hillary needs 452. To have the majority of pledged delegates, Bernie needs 875 more. Hillary needs 598 more.
From Daily Kos: Fox and other right-wing outlets have always used certain “go-to" logical fallacies in their ideological arguments: ad hominem, straw man, and non sequitur. (Actually, if you listen to any one of Trump’s speeches, you can usually hear examples of all three in the same speech.) Although the right wing still uses these the most, lately I have noticed the increased use of several uncommon fallacies that are becoming more and more common in conservative circles. Although there are literally hundreds of logical fallacies, I’m just going to focus on these few. Let’s begin …
This is a type of Ad ignorantiam, which is to claim something is true because it cannot be proven false. What this subcategory refers to is putting the burden on you to disprove their belief. The problem is that this is impossible. Decades ago, my statistics teacher gave me an example that I still remember: the Loch Ness Monster. Even if you somehow managed to drain the entire loch, and had teams of people scouring the ground, would that satisfy the believers? Of course not. They’d argue that the mythical beast just went into hiding, or was transported, or some other such nonsense.
I always think about this fallacy when I hear the Birthers. They are a PERFECT example. No amount of evidence will ever satisfy them: experts, analysis of the document, records, birth announcements in newspapers—nothing. I recalled seeing the segment below years ago and specifically searched for this because I really want you to hear what birther Alan Keyes says immediately after the host read through ALL of the evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii. It starts at the 1:10 mark. He says two words that blew my mind—and prove my point.
I promise it’s worth it:
TEAbuggery most foul!! This is the first of several logical fallacies (also called criminal thinking errors in my volunteer work in prison, or InsaniTEA in politics). Click through for the rest.
From The New Yorker: America’s racists, who have long viewed New York with a mixture of hostility, contempt, and fear, are suddenly feeling much more positive about the Empire State a cross-section of racists confirmed on Tuesday night.
In interviews conducted shortly after 9 P.M., racists from coast to coast echoed the opinion of Fresno, California, bigot Harland Dorrinson, who remarked, “You know, maybe New York isn’t such a bad place after all.”
“I always thought that New York seemed like a hellhole to be avoided at all costs,” Dorrinson said. “Now I’m thinking I might want to take the family there on vacation. Maybe even take in a few Broadway shows.”
Andy, most folks don’t realize that less then 10% of New York State residents are registered Republicans. This racist idiot fringe has been getting extra attention, because of the primary,
Cartoon:
The birthday of the first modern Republican.
Today you’re especially blessed, because I found two different clips from my favorite comedienne, Samantha Bee. In the first, she has some fun with Bernie supporters,
On the eve of the New York primary, Full Frontal host Samantha Bee decided to chat with a few voters who’ve declared their support for Bernie Sanders.
“You know, it’s easy for dried-up old crones like me to dismiss Bernie fans as naive kids who believe in wizards and unicorns,” Bee stated introducing the segment. “Sometimes too easy/ But I wanted to hear from actual Sanders supporters themselves.”
Meeting at Cafe Wha? – an old school folk spot in New York City’s West Village – Bee’s invitees made up an “impossibly diverse panel,” who she turned to with a few questions about their favorite candidate.,,
Inserted from <Alternet>
As much as I hate to say it, they did seem a bit gullible.
In the second, Samantha destroyed the Republican candidates.
That’s three for three for Bee, but to be fair, her targets were impossible to miss.
I’m getting a late start today, because I needed a cat nap, and I had a lot of scheduling to get done. I’m pleased to announce that the Squatch, Nameless and I have agreed to promote another person to our staff in the position of Author. I won’t actually come out and say who it is, but our new Author must get confused about whether to plant a bulb or kiss a roo.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today’s took me 3:02 (average 5:20). To do it, click here. How did you do?
Short Takes:
From Daily Kos: Better than a transcript, here is an actual video of Hillary Clinton giving a speech at the Goldman Sachs 10,000 Women: Proving the Case for Women Entrepreneurs dinner. The video was posted October 22, 2014. I’m not sure if this is what Bernie Sanders is demanding (snark), but it does fit the three criteria, yes? Hillary Clinton, Goldman Sachs, and Speeches. This particular Hillary Clinton “unpaid” speech is about the empowerment of women — an issue the former U.S. Secretary of State has made a priority throughout her political career.
To be fair there were two ways this speech did not meet Bernie’s criteria. He wanted the speech to be paid. This was free. He wanted the speech to have been presented behind closed doors. This was not.
From TPM: Rep. Pete King (R-NY) went on a tear against the Republican presidential frontrunners in a blistering Tuesday interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” joking that he would commit suicide if Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) earns the nomination.
“I’m not endorsing Ted Cruz, in case anyone is confused,” King said. “I think I’ll take cyanide if he got the nomination.
Cyanide? He will?!!? Dang!! Maybe there actually is a valid reason to support the TRUSed Uranus!!
From Common Dreams: The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama’s immigration executive actions, as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock—which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
This is a case where 4 – 4 equals SCROTUS, (Republican Constitutional VD).
Cartoon: