Dec 272010
 

While many of us, myself included, think that Dodd-Frank did not go far enough towards implementing financial reform, the bill does contain several good provisions.  For that reason, Republicans are going out of their way to prevent and weaken their implementation, as the following articles demonstrate.  They have even go so far as to appoint a US Chamber of Commerce lobbyist, specializing in deregulation of derivatives, to oversee the Congressional liaising with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission.

capitalismEver since the Dodd-Frank financial reform law was signed in July, the question has been whether it would actually lead to a stable financial system. If the Republicans who will control the House next year get their way, the answer will surely be “no.”

The legislation requires regulators to write hundreds of rules to put the law into effect. To their credit, regulatory agencies have begun that process with a sense of mission and depth of expertise that was missing in the years before the financial crisis.

In particular, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — which share the all-important regulation of the multitrillion-dollar derivatives market — have proposed rules that are tough and sophisticated. The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is ramping up. The Financial Stability Oversight Council, led by the Treasury secretary, will report in January on how to implement the “Volcker rule” to restrict proprietary trading by banks.

The process is painstaking, and the outcome is uncertain. But progress is being made — and the House Republican leaders want none of that. Representative Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the next chairman of the House Financial Services Committee told The Birmingham News that “Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks.” He later said he meant regulators should set parameters, not micromanage banks, yet he seems to prefer the parameters that were in effect before the crisis when regulators did serve the banks.

In a letter to the S.E.C. written with Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the next majority whip, he said Dodd-Frank would do little for economic recovery and warned against rules that could curtail growth. He and Representative Frank Lucas of Oklahoma, who will lead the agriculture committee, which shares jurisdiction over derivatives, have urged regulators to avoid “overly prescriptive” rules on derivatives speculation. He has also warned the Financial Stability Oversight Council that a strong Volcker rule would impose “substantial” economic costs, without making the system safer.

Mr. Bachus’s salvoes are only the start. Some Republicans want new laws to weaken the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and others have pledged numerous hearings, which seem intended not to oversee the process but to inhibit it by creating delays and communicating hostility.

Another damaging attack would be to starve the budgets of the S.E.C. and the commodities commission… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <NY Times>

Nothing here is unexpected.  Republicans represent Wall Street and oppose Main Street.

Here’s another reward to the US Chamber of Commerce for all that campaign cash.

chamberA few days ago, incoming Agriculture Chairman Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) announced the hire of Ryan McKee as the senior staffer to oversee the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. McKee is currently a lobbyist working for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s division dedicated to deregulating complex derivatives products. In her new role working for Lucas, McKee will be liaising with regulators in charge of implementing new rules under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law to overhaul the over-the-counter derivatives market.

As ThinkProgress reported, the Chamber, which is funded by AIG, JP Morgan, CitiGroup, and other financial interests, took the lead role in fighting to defeat Wall Street reform efforts. Last year, the Chamber organized a conference call with other financial industry lobby groups and bank lobbyists to coordinate their efforts… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

Again, nothing here is unexpected, but in order to fight against it, we need to understand how Republicans are going about enabling Banksters to fulfill the Republican goal, second only to establishing a 1,000 year Republican Regime: the transfer or wealth from the poor and middle classes to the millionaires and billionaires.

Share

  2 Responses to “Republicans Gear Up to Keep Bankster Crime Booming”

  1. The truth is that the public ALL OVER THE WORLD fall asleep whe you start talking about the intricacies of the financial markets. everyone thinks “OK Wall Street and other exchanges around the world are where you buy and sell portions of companies[stocks]” and that is about it.

    What is a:
    derivative
    hedge
    CDO
    CBO
    annuity
    and a ton of other shit nobody but an insider knows about since Uncle Ronnie started the grand fuck of the America he professed to love so much through insistence of deregulation and Alan Greenspan pushing it forward for twenty years?

    Even Wharton graduates have openly stated the the complexity of the market has gotten too hard to follow all of it and now they have to become specialists in only certain areas. So your money manager may feel comfortably safe say in precious metals but because someone else has bought derivatives in wheat to hedge against a possible loss in precious metals he has taken value away from trader A who is handling your investment. Which means he is still cool because he gets paid a fee win or lose but you the one who trusted him with your money gets screwed right up the old chute when the precious metals market collapses because the herd then moved their money to wheat..

    If you want to fix Wall Street which NOBODY SANE (but me of course) does. Close out all markets that do not trade only in portions of companies (STOCKS) and the commodities (FOOD) get rid of all the made for profit markets. One of which in case you still don’t get it was the sub-prime mortgage market. That was a creation of a banker and then came the CDO’s and then the collapse.

    Financial institutions are there today, not like they were 50 years ago to handle your money, but to CREATE NEW MARKETS they can profit from.

    • Mark, I won’t claim to understand financial markets, and I have no credentials to expertise beyond Economics 101 in college. However, I know what all the things you listed are. I know because I made the effort to learn it so that I can have informed political opinions on the subject with which to make voting decisions. That so many have not speaks more to the laziness of American voters than anything else.

      In principle, I agree with your solutions, but I would not go that far. There are four main areas of financial markets: commercial lending, open equity investing, commodities trading, and the secret, private markets where the Banksters love to play.

      Secret and private markets should be closed. Commercial lending, equity investing and commodities trading should be divided, such that no firm participates in more than one of the three. Anything that can be traded openly should be, with strict regulation to prevent fraud.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.