{"id":7454,"date":"2012-03-24T12:38:20","date_gmt":"2012-03-24T19:38:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=7454"},"modified":"2012-03-24T12:38:20","modified_gmt":"2012-03-24T19:38:20","slug":"scrotus-skullduggery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2012\/03\/24\/scrotus-skullduggery\/","title":{"rendered":"SCROTUS Skullduggery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">This story is far from the beaten path.&#160; SCROTUS are the extreme, activist ideologues on SCOTUS, who care more for millionaires, billionaires, and corporate criminals than for the US Constitution.&#160; Once in a while, SCROTUS does something that obviously has to be wrong, and makes absolutely no sense.&#160; Then comes the light bulb moment.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px\" title=\"SCOTUS4\" border=\"0\" alt=\"SCOTUS4\" align=\"left\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/SCOTUS4.jpg\" width=\"360\" height=\"224\" \/>Dozens of suits against drug companies have been dismissed in federal and state courts because of a decision by the Supreme Court last year that <strong>makes it virtually impossible to sue generic manufacturers for failing to provide adequate warning of a prescription drug\u2019s dangers<\/strong>. This outrageous denial of a patient\u2019s right to recover fair damages makes it imperative that Congress or the Food and Drug Administration fashion a remedy. <\/p>\n<p>This situation is particularly bizarre because patients using the brand-name drug can sue when those using the generic form of the drug cannot, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/03\/21\/business\/drug-lawsuits-hinge-on-the-detail-of-a-label.html\" target=\"_blank\">as explained by Katie Thomas in The Times<\/a> on Wednesday. In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that a Vermont woman who had her hand and forearm amputated because of gangrene after being injected with a brand name antinausea drug could sue the manufacturer for inadequate warning of the risks; <strong>she won $6.8 million from Wyeth<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>In 2011, the court ruled that similar failure-to-warn suits could not be brought against makers of generic drugs. As a result, an Indiana woman who was also forced to have her hand amputated because of gangrene after being injected with a generic version of the same antinausea drug <strong>had her case dismissed<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Same drug. Same devastating health consequences. Opposite results<\/strong>\u2026 [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/03\/24\/opinion\/a-bizarre-outcome-on-generic-drugs.html\" target=\"_blank\">NY Times<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">There can be no doubt that this is thoroughly unjust.&#160; But why would the fascist five make a decision that appears to favor the generic drug companies over Big Pharma?&#160; Then came the light bulb.&#160; Appearances can be deceiving.&#160; Any consumer, who wishes to preserve their ability to sue in such a case, is forced to pay Big Pharma ten, twenty or more times the actual generic value of the med, thus expanding Big Pharma\u2019s profits.&#160; I think that is the SCROTUS skullduggery in this situation.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">If a Republican wins the White House, we are guaranteed more ideologue Injustices like Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy, a fate our Constitution cannot survive.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This story is far from the beaten path.&#160; SCROTUS are the extreme, activist ideologues on SCOTUS, who care more for millionaires, billionaires, and corporate criminals than for the US Constitution.&#160; Once in a while, SCROTUS does something that obviously has to be wrong, and makes absolutely no sense.&#160; Then comes the light bulb moment. Dozens <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2012\/03\/24\/scrotus-skullduggery\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}