{"id":6350,"date":"2011-11-21T00:03:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-21T08:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/21\/ows-the-empire-strikes-back\/"},"modified":"2011-11-21T00:03:00","modified_gmt":"2011-11-21T08:03:00","slug":"ows-the-empire-strikes-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/11\/21\/ows-the-empire-strikes-back\/","title":{"rendered":"OWS: The Empire Strikes Back!"},"content":{"rendered":"

It is a rare thing, when we actually get to see the minds of the one percent and analyze their own perspective on their plots to prevent control od their rapacious greed.  None of this should be overly surprising, except to those who still believe that there is no difference between the two political parties.  If you do, that is exactly what the Banksters want you top believe, as the following unequivocally demonstrates.<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\"21bankers\"A Washington lobbying firm with links to the financial industry has proposed an $850,000 plan to take on the Occupy Wall Street protest and the politicians who support it.<\/p>\n

The secret proposal has been revealed in a memo obtained by the MSNBC program ‘Up with Chris Hayes’.<\/p>\n

The proposal was written on the letterhead of the lobbying firm Clark Lytle Geduldig & Cranford (CLGC) and addressed to one of its clients, the American Bankers Association (ABA), reports MSNBC.CLGC\u2019s memo proposes that the ABA pay CLGC $850,000 to conduct ‘opposition research’ on Occupy Wall Street in order to construct ‘negative narratives’ about the protests and allied politicians. <\/p>\n

The memo also states that Democratic victories in 2012 would be detrimental for Wall Street and names specific races in which it says Wall Street would benefit by electing Republicans instead<\/strong>, the report says.<\/p>\n

According to the memo, if Democrats embrace OWS, ‘This would mean more than just short-term political discomfort for Wall Street.<\/strong><\/p>\n

‘It has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye.’<\/p>\n

The memo also suggests that Democratic victories in 2012 should not be the ABA\u2019s biggest concern. \u201c\u2026 (T)he bigger concern,\u201d the memo says, should be that Republicans will no longer defend Wall Street companies.’\u2026 [emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <The Daily Mail<\/a>><\/p>\n

Ask yourself this.  Why are Banksters targeting Democrats and supporting Republicans?  The answer is simple.  While they may own a few Democrats, line Benedict Nelson (DINO-NE), they own the entire Republican Party.<\/font><\/p>\n

Here is Chris Hayes as he broke this story.<\/font><\/p>\n

<\/embed><\/object><\/font><\/p>\n

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news<\/a>, world news<\/a>, and news about the economy<\/a><\/p>\n

Democrats will be tough on the Banksters.  Republicans will give them their way.  Banksters know it.  You should too.  Hayes is right.  What other schemes are Banksters and their Republican lackeys  hatching?  The best way not to find out is to remove Republicans from office in 2012.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is a rare thing, when we actually get to see the minds of the one percent and analyze their own perspective on their plots to prevent control od their rapacious greed.  None of this should be overly surprising, except to those who still believe that there is no difference between the two political parties.  […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6350\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}