{"id":619,"date":"2010-02-13T03:02:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-13T11:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=619"},"modified":"2010-02-13T03:02:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-13T11:02:00","slug":"fox-expert-lies-about-clinton%e2%80%99s-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/02\/13\/fox-expert-lies-about-clinton%e2%80%99s-care\/","title":{"rendered":"Fox Expert Lies About Clinton\u2019s Care"},"content":{"rendered":"

Let me start with some good news<\/strong>.  Past President Bill Clinton is now at home after two stents were successfully installed in a coronary artery.<\/p>\n

Trying to take political advantage, Faux Noise falsely claimed that he would not have gotten such care had HCR passed.<\/p>\n

\n

\"Fox-sheep\"<\/a> This morning, Fox & Friends covered President Bill Clinton\u2019s hospitalization by asking if the President would have been treated for his heart problems \u201cif the health care reform had gone through.\u201d \u201cWould he have gotten those stents?\u201d host Brian Kilmeade asked in-house health reform expert Peter J. Johnson Jr  <\/span>[Faux Noise delinked]. <\/font><\/p>\n

Johnson admitted that \u201cunder a lot of protocols he would have gotten those stents,\u201d but suggested that if the government adopted best practice methods using comparative effectiveness research, \u201cperhaps hundreds of thousands of people like the president\u201d would receive a cheaper, less effective, treatment:<\/font><\/p>\n

JOHNSON: If the government decides to adopt the Peter Orszag, budget director, architect of health care, method and put in regulations that say there is a gold standard, there is a best practice based on the literature, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people like the president, I\u2019m not going to make a determination\u2026if the new standard is save money, best practices, does President Clinton or you or I who needs it get the stent under the new regimen of health care effectiveness?<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

Watch it:<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/param><\/param><\/param><\/embed><\/object><\/font><\/p>\n

Conservatives have long used comparative effectiveness research (CER) to further their claim that health care reform would ration treatments based on cost, impose a one-size-fits-all standard for medicine, and keep doctors from prescribing more expensive and effective procedures. But this line of thinking misunderstands the purpose of CER and ignores legislative language that specifically prohibits the government from applying research findings to coverage decisions. CER is a recommendation, not a mandate. (See<\/font> pg. 1652 of the Senate bill<\/a> or<\/font> pg. 769 of the House bill<\/a>). <\/font><\/p>\n

Rather than making arbitrary decisions based on cost, CER \u2014 which compares clinical outcomes of alternative therapies used to manage the same condition \u2014 would provide doctors with unbiased information about the most effective treatments, help doctors and patients make better informed decisions, and improve the quality of care. Properly conducted CER will actually promote faster adoption of personalized care, not one-size-fits all medicine…<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <Think Progress<\/a>><\/p>\n

The GOP and their ministry of propaganda know only how to lie.  In response, we must arm ourselves with the truth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Let me start with some good news.  Past President Bill Clinton is now at home after two stents were successfully installed in a coronary artery. Trying to take political advantage, Faux Noise falsely claimed that he would not have gotten such care had HCR passed. This morning, Fox & Friends covered President Bill Clinton\u2019s hospitalization […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}