{"id":6027,"date":"2011-10-04T00:42:11","date_gmt":"2011-10-04T07:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=6027"},"modified":"2011-10-04T00:42:11","modified_gmt":"2011-10-04T07:42:11","slug":"scotus-allows-dallas-to-confuse-voters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/10\/04\/scotus-allows-dallas-to-confuse-voters\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS allows Dallas to confuse voters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Residents of Dallas County, Texas need to take heed of a quirk in their voting machines, because they are sure to confuse voters.&#160; Dallas County Democrats sued and won in the Appeals Court, but Republican dominated County appealed to the Supreme Court.&#160; In my cartoon in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/?p=6006\" target=\"_blank\">yesterday\u2019s Open Thread<\/a>, I said to hide the Constitution, because the Court is sitting again, so I don\u2019t have to tell you how the decision turned out.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px\" title=\"4ivoting\" border=\"0\" alt=\"4ivoting\" align=\"left\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/4ivoting.jpg\" width=\"360\" height=\"284\" \/>The Supreme Court has thrown out a ruling on the use of a certain electronic voting machine in Texas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The high court without comment declared moot an appeal of a ruling against Dallas County, Texas. That county was sued by the Texas Democratic Party over the use of iVotronic machines.<\/p>\n<p>They allow people to vote straight-party tickets, but <strong>if the voter subsequently touches any of the candidates in that party on the screen, their vote for that person is rescinded<\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;Before machines, Dallas County used paper ballots. <strong>If a voter selected a straight ticket, and that party&#8217;s candidate, his or her vote for that candidate would count<\/strong>&#8230; [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/hosted.ap.org\/dynamic\/stories\/U\/US_SUPREME_COURT_VOTING_MACHINES?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT\" target=\"_blank\">AP<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">In short, the machines, treat voting a ticket and then selecting individuals the exact opposite of the way these votes were counted using paper ballots.&#160; This gives Republicans a distinct advantage.&#160; Because their voters need to be told what to think, they already have networks in place to do so.&#160; You can be sure that pastors in the pulpits of every supply-side pseudo-Christian church will be repeating instructions over and over again.&#160; In addition, the Republican party will do everything they can to keep the information from poor and minority voters,&#160; Dallas County Democrats must pick up that slack.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">In addition, moving from paper to electronic machines is a step backwards.&#160; Remember 2004.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" height=\"480\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/23mmkcaIPDk?rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"640\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Residents of Dallas County, Texas need to take heed of a quirk in their voting machines, because they are sure to confuse voters.&#160; Dallas County Democrats sued and won in the Appeals Court, but Republican dominated County appealed to the Supreme Court.&#160; In my cartoon in yesterday\u2019s Open Thread, I said to hide the Constitution, <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/10\/04\/scotus-allows-dallas-to-confuse-voters\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6027"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6027\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}