{"id":5954,"date":"2011-09-27T00:01:47","date_gmt":"2011-09-27T07:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=5954"},"modified":"2011-09-27T00:01:47","modified_gmt":"2011-09-27T07:01:47","slug":"how-the-super-committee-can-solve-their-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/09\/27\/how-the-super-committee-can-solve-their-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Super Committee can solve their problem"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Super Committee is tasked with finding $1.2 trillion in savings to prevent draconian across the board cuts if they fail to do so.  Republicans are also anxious to prevent the alternative, because the automatic cuts would slash military spending, a cow almost as sacred to them as their Pope Grover.  There is actually a rather obvious fix that can accomplish their goal overnight, if the Democrats on the committee refuse to allow Republican social engineering there.<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\"27super-committee\"It’s a move that’s been dismissed as a budget gimmick, but it’s also one that could make the supercommittee’s job a whole lot easier: counting the savings of withdrawing troops from Iraq and Afghanistan<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

As the 12 lawmakers on the panel begin searching high and low for at least $1.2 trillion in deficit cuts, they are eyeing once-sacrosanct areas like entitlements and weighing huge projects like tax reform…<\/p>\n

…But if the troop withdrawal is factored in, over a trillion dollars in savings is there for the taking<\/strong>, and at least for the time being, supercommittee members are not ruling it out.<\/p>\n

"Everything’s on the table," supercommittee member Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said, when asked if such savings should be considered as part of the panel’s mission.<\/p>\n

In the president’s proposal to cut the deficit, a major chunk of the savings in the bill comes from the withdrawal of troops following the "surge." Those savings come about because the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) assumes war spending will stay at the temporary levels of last year for the next 10 years when scoring savings<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The White House says $1.1 trillion will be saved by drawing down those troops from Afghanistan and making the U.S. presence in Iraq a civilian, not a military, one<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Given that the supercommittee must track down at least $1.2 trillion in cuts to avoid the triggering of automatic cuts, simply accounting for those savings would nearly get the panel there all by itself… [emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <Common Dreams<\/a>><\/p>\n

Republicans will not agree to this easily.  Remember that their goal has nothing to do with the deficit ort the debt.  They are using these things as an excuse to push for privatizing Social Security, replacing Medicare with a coupon, replacing Medicaid with a voucher program, and destroying public employee unions.  When they say there is no other way, this will prove they are lying.<\/font><\/p>\n

The savings can be further accelerated ending the occupation of Afghanistan.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Super Committee is tasked with finding $1.2 trillion in savings to prevent draconian across the board cuts if they fail to do so.  Republicans are also anxious to prevent the alternative, because the automatic cuts would slash military spending, a cow almost as sacred to them as their Pope Grover.  There is actually a […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5954"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5954\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}