{"id":5458,"date":"2011-07-25T00:03:02","date_gmt":"2011-07-25T07:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=5458"},"modified":"2011-07-25T00:03:02","modified_gmt":"2011-07-25T07:03:02","slug":"winning-republican-style","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/07\/25\/winning-republican-style\/","title":{"rendered":"Winning, Republican Style"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the distant past, after the 2004 Presidential elections, on a previous incarnation of this site, I posted that Republicans had stolen the election.  I based that conclusion on analysis of exit data as compared to official results.  I determined that, where Democrats controlled the counting, the variance was well within the expected margin of error.  On the other hand, where Republicans control the counting the variance averaged  4-5%, always favoring the Republican.  In Ohio the disparities were so extreme, that they were statistically impossible.  For example, several solidly Democratic precincts were counted overwhelmingly for Bush with more Bush votes that the precincts had registered voters.  So I knew the results had been hacked.  Now we know how they did it.<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\"25VoteHack\"<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n

The outcome of the 2004 Ohio General Election has always been a thorn in my side. I was tracking it on election night and it never made sense to me. Never. <\/font><\/p>\n

Over time, evidence has emerged that supports the allegation that Ohio’s vote data made an unscheduled detour through Chatanooga, TN and during that stop, was doctored to make sure George W. Bush won Ohio and the election.<\/font><\/p>\n

FreePress.org:<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n

Until now, the architectural maps and contracts from the Ohio 2004 election were never made public, which may indicate that the entire system was designed for fraud<\/strong>. In a previous sworn affidavit to the court, Spoonamore declared: "The SmarTech system was set up precisely as a King Pin computer used in criminal acts against banking or credit card processes and had the needed level of access to both county tabulators and Secretary of State computers to allow whoever was running SmarTech computers to decide the output of the county tabulators under its control<\/strong>." <\/font><\/p>\n

Spoonamore also swore that "…the architecture further confirms how this election was stolen. The computer system and SmarTech had the correct placement, connectivity, and computer experts necessary to change the election in any manner desired by the controllers of the SmarTech computers<\/strong>." <\/font><\/p>\n

Project Censored named the outsourcing of Ohio’s 2004 election votes to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee to a company owned by Republican partisans as one of the most censored stories in the world.<\/font><\/p>\n

… [emphasis added<\/em>]<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <Crooks and Liars<\/a>><\/p>\n

Now just in case you\u2019re wondering who SmarTech is, they are the IT company that serves the Bush family, and the one who managed Karl Rove\u2019s systems, the ones with all the \u201cmissing\u201d emails.<\/font><\/p>\n

I strongly suggest that you click through and read the rest of that article.<\/font><\/p>\n

In the 2012 election, Republicans will control the vote counting in more states than Democrats.  As long as Republicans control the House, no federal election reform is possible, so if you want to protect your votes you\u2019ll have to do it in your own states.  If electronic voting machines are to be used, they must keep a paper record of every vote cast.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the distant past, after the 2004 Presidential elections, on a previous incarnation of this site, I posted that Republicans had stolen the election.  I based that conclusion on analysis of exit data as compared to official results.  I determined that, where Democrats controlled the counting, the variance was well within the expected margin of […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}