{"id":5294,"date":"2011-07-03T02:41:18","date_gmt":"2011-07-03T09:41:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=5294"},"modified":"2011-07-03T02:41:18","modified_gmt":"2011-07-03T09:41:18","slug":"how-fox-gets-sheeple-to-say-ba-a-a-a-a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/07\/03\/how-fox-gets-sheeple-to-say-ba-a-a-a-a\/","title":{"rendered":"How Fox Gets Sheeple to Say Ba-a-a-a-a!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">There can be no doubt that Fox is truly the Republican Ministry of Propaganda, since <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldpublicopinion.org\/pipa\/articles\/brunitedstatescanadara\/671.php?nid=&amp;id=&amp;pnt=671&amp;lb=\" target=\"_blank\">Fox viewers are America\u2019s most misinformed<\/a>.&#160; The bad part is that few rational people can stomach watching <em>Faux Noise<\/em> long enough to see just how they do it.&#160; Cynthia Boaz has come to the rescue with an excellent article detailing fourteen of the propaganda techniques Fox uses.&#160; This is how Fox gets sheeple to say Ba-a-a-a-a!<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px\" title=\"3FoxSheep\" border=\"0\" alt=\"3FoxSheep\" align=\"left\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/3FoxSheep.jpg\" width=\"360\" height=\"261\" \/>&#8230;My curiosity about this question compelled me to sit down and document the most oft-used methods by which willful ignorance has been turned into dogma by Fox News and other propagandists disguised as media. The techniques I identify here also help to explain the simultaneously powerful identification the Fox media audience has with the network, as well as their ardent, reflexive defenses of it.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The good news is that the more conscious you are of these techniques, the less likely they are to work on you. The bad news is that those reading this article are probably the least in need in of it.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><span style=\"text-align: left\"><strong><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\">1. Panic Mongering.<\/font><\/strong><\/span><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> This goes one step beyond simple fear mongering. With panic mongering, there is never a break from the fear. The idea is to terrify and terrorize the audience during every waking moment. From Muslims to swine flu to recession to homosexuals to immigrants to the rapture itself, the belief over at Fox seems to be that if your fight-or-flight reflexes aren&#8217;t activated, you aren&#8217;t alive. This of course raises the question: why terrorize your own audience? Because it is the fastest way to bypasses the rational brain. In other words, when people are afraid, they don&#8217;t think rationally. And when they can&#8217;t think rationally, they&#8217;ll believe anything.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><span style=\"text-align: left\"><strong><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\">2. Character Assassination\/Ad Hominem.<\/font><\/strong><\/span><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> Fox does not like to waste time debating the idea. Instead, they prefer a quicker route to dispensing with their opponents: go after the person&#8217;s credibility, motives, intelligence, character, or, if necessary, sanity. No category of character assassination is off the table and no offense is beneath them. Fox and like-minded media figures also use ad hominem attacks not just against individuals, but entire categories of people in an effort to discredit the ideas of every person who is seen to fall into that category, e.g. &quot;liberals,&quot; &quot;hippies,&quot; &quot;progressives&quot; etc. This form of argument &#8211; if it can be called that &#8211; leaves no room for genuine debate over ideas, so by definition, it is undemocratic. Not to mention just plain crass.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><span style=\"text-align: left\"><strong><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\">3. Projection\/Flipping.<\/font><\/strong><\/span><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> This one is frustrating for the viewer who is trying to actually follow the argument. It involves taking whatever underhanded tactic you&#8217;re using and then accusing your opponent of doing it to you first. We see this frequently in the immigration discussion, where anti-racists are accused of racism, or in the climate change debate, where those who argue for human causes of the phenomenon are accused of not having science or facts on their side. It&#8217;s often called upon when the media host finds themselves on the ropes in the debate.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"line-height: normal; margin: 0in; font-family: \" align=\"left\"><span style=\"text-align: left\"><strong><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\">4. Rewriting History.<\/font><\/strong><\/span><font style=\"font-size: 12pt\"> This is another way of saying that propagandists make the facts fit their worldview. The Downing Street Memos on the Iraq war were a classic example of this on a massive scale, but it happens daily and over smaller issues as well. A recent case in point is Palin&#8217;s mangling of the Paul Revere ride, which Fox reporters have bent over backward to validate. Why lie about the historical facts, even when they can be demonstrated to be false? Well, because dogmatic minds actually find it easier to reject reality than to update their viewpoints. They will literally rewrite history if it serves their interests. And they&#8217;ll often speak with such authority that the casual viewer will be tempted to question what they knew as fact\u2026 [<span style=\"text-align: left\"><em>emphasis original<\/em><\/span>]<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/news\/151497\/14_propaganda_techniques_fox_&amp;quot;news&amp;quot;_uses_to_brainwash_americans\" target=\"_blank\">Alternet<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Now, I only gave you four.&#160; For the other ten, click through to the article.&#160; You\u2019ll be glad you did!<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There can be no doubt that Fox is truly the Republican Ministry of Propaganda, since Fox viewers are America\u2019s most misinformed.&#160; The bad part is that few rational people can stomach watching Faux Noise long enough to see just how they do it.&#160; Cynthia Boaz has come to the rescue with an excellent article detailing <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2011\/07\/03\/how-fox-gets-sheeple-to-say-ba-a-a-a-a\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}