The House has been preparing to tweak the Senate bill with a package of amendments based on a deal reached last week with organized labor, send it back to the upper chamber for final passage, and claim victory. But Coakley could well lose her race, depriving Democrats of the 60th vote they’d need to overcome a filibuster, and that unthinkable possibility is forcing party leaders to consider a Plan.<\/font><\/p>\n As I noted last week, the House<\/font> could simply pass the Senate bill unchanged<\/a>, and Obama could sign reform into law. As recently as last week, a number of high-profile Democrats were saying that would never fly. But many are now suggesting that the House might still pull through, if<\/i> House members are promised that the deal they agreed to last week will be passed separately–and quickly–through the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process<\/strong>.<\/font><\/p>\n![\"PlanB\"](\"http:\/\/s217.photobucket.com\/albums\/cc83\/TomCat1948or2\/Blog%202010\/J-M\/PlanB_1E7E\/PlanB.jpg\" "\\"PlanB\\"")
<\/a> A new way forward on health care is gaining some traction among Democrats, who are preparing for the possibility that Democrat Martha Coakley will lose her bid to replace Ted Kennedy in the Senate, costing Democrats their 60th vote, which they’ll need to overcome the filibuster. <\/font><\/p>\n