{"id":36628,"date":"2019-05-30T10:03:47","date_gmt":"2019-05-30T17:03:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=36628"},"modified":"2019-05-30T10:03:47","modified_gmt":"2019-05-30T17:03:47","slug":"mueller-contradicted-barrf-and-his-fuhrer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2019\/05\/30\/mueller-contradicted-barrf-and-his-fuhrer\/","title":{"rendered":"Mueller Contradicted Barrf and his Fuhrer"},"content":{"rendered":"

When Trump’s personal lawyer, Barrf, presented <\/font>his interpretation of the Mueller Report, I smelled a rat.  When I read (actually had my auto-reader dictate) the redacted report, I saw that rat, plain as day.  But when Muller shared nine minutes of comments about his report, yesterday, the rat bit me on the ass.  Mullet contradicted Barrf and his Fuhrer.  He also stated clearly, who needs to take action.<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\"0530barr-trump-mueller\" <\/p>\n

In his own public comments, Attorney General William Barr has leaned heavily on the idea that Mueller did not feel the guidelines are what prevented him from charging President Donald Trump with obstruction. <\/p>\n

But Mueller on Wednesday undercut that narrative, making clear in his comments that the guidelines had a significant influence on the investigation, tying his hands from the very start from even considering whether a crime had been committed<\/strong>. <\/p>\n

Indicting Trump while he was in office was “not an option we could consider,”<\/strong> Mueller said, explicitly citing the official guidance from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <CNN<\/a>><\/font><\/p>\n

You should not take my word for this.  Here’s the complete statement from Robert Mueller<\/a>.  Watch it!<\/font><\/p>\n