{"id":3401,"date":"2010-11-18T04:22:02","date_gmt":"2010-11-18T12:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=3401"},"modified":"2010-11-18T04:22:02","modified_gmt":"2010-11-18T12:22:02","slug":"stopping-that-soviet-threat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/11\/18\/stopping-that-soviet-threat\/","title":{"rendered":"Stopping That Soviet Threat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">It\u2019s a given that the Republican party lacks anything resembling a a new idea, but some of their old ideas are downright scary.&#160; Did you know we still face a soviet threat?&#160; That\u2019s what one Republican Senator said, while trying to justify a policy that just may be a cover-up to hide a Republican threat against Russia.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Appearing on MSNBC with Andrea Mitchell today, Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) attempted to justify the threatened Republican obstruction of the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia. But in doing so, <strong>he wrongly called Russia the Soviet Union<\/strong> \u2014 not once, but twice. Watch it:<\/p>\n<p>&#160;<object width=\"640\" height=\"505\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/aEx7lacmwmo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6\"><\/param><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\"><\/param><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/aEx7lacmwmo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" width=\"640\" height=\"505\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p>While Barrasso may say this was a slip of the tongue and that he knows that the Soviet Union collapsed nearly twenty years ago in 1991, <strong>this is not the first time far-right senators have made this mistake when talking about START<\/strong>. Barrasso also tellingly concluded his remarks by asserting that he disagrees \u201cwith the component [of START] that weakens our own missile defense against all enemies, not <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=aEx7lacmwmo&amp;feature=player_embedded\" target=\"_blank\">just the Soviet Union<\/a>.\u201d <\/p>\n<p><strong><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; display: inline; float: right\" title=\"18ussr\" alt=\"18ussr\" align=\"right\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/18ussr.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"240\" \/>Grouping the Soviet Union (meaning Russia) with other \u201cenemies\u201d of the U.S., is reflective of an outdated Cold War mindset that can only lead to renewed tensions with Russia<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>Should Republicans kill the New START treaty, the \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/World\/Europe\/2010\/1115\/Obama-s-US-Russia-reset-hangs-on-Senate-approval-of-START-treaty\" target=\"_blank\">reset<\/a>\u201d of U.S.-Russian relations may collapse. This could <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogress.org\/issues\/2010\/04\/new_start.html\" target=\"_blank\">endanger U.S. troops in Afghanistan<\/a>, who depend on supply routes through Russia, and could derail Russian cooperation on Iran sanctions. Perhaps most worrying is that without New START, the U.S. will be unable to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/idUSTRE6AC08120101113?utm_source=START+News&amp;utm_campaign=ff7e0406ad-START_News7_19_2010&amp;utm_medium=email\" target=\"_blank\">monitor Russia\u2019s nuclear arsenal<\/a> as it has since the end of the Cold War, potentially creating significant nuclear instability\u2026 [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2010\/11\/17\/barrasso-soviet-threat\/\" target=\"_blank\">Think Progress<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Rachel Maddow thinks that the sole reason for this is the Republican policy of opposing anything Obama likes, including their own ideas.&#160; She and Josh Rogin make an excellent case for this.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\"><object width=\"592\" height=\"346\" id=\"msnbc31d781\" classid=\"clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000\" target=\"_blank\" codebase=\"http:\/\/download.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/cabs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/32545640\" \/><param name=\"FlashVars\" value=\"launch=40245119^0^791012&amp;width=592&amp;height=346\" \/><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\" \/><embed name=\"msnbc31d781\" src=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/32545640\" width=\"592\" height=\"346\" FlashVars=\"launch=40245119^0^791012&amp;width=592&amp;height=346\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowFullScreen=\"true\" wmode=\"transparent\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" pluginspage=\"http:\/\/www.adobe.com\/shockwave\/download\/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash\"><\/embed><\/object><\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; margin-top: 5px; width: 592px; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; background: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; color: #999; font-size: 11px\">Visit msnbc.com for <a style=\"border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important\" href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\">breaking news<\/a>, <a style=\"border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important\" href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/3032507\">world news<\/a>, and <a style=\"border-bottom: #999 1px dotted; height: 13px; color: #5799db !important; font-weight: normal !important; text-decoration: none !important\" href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/3032072\">news about the economy<\/a><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Here we have one of those rare instances in which I think Rachel might be mistaken.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">I think that Republicans still think of Russia as the enemy.&#160; In addition, this stance could involve corporate criminal greed.&#160; When the Soviet Union broke up four new independent republics, collectively known as <em>the Stans<\/em>,&#160; around the Caspian Sea, inherited the Soviet Union\u2019s huge gas reserves.&#160; Currently the gas from those fields are piped to Russia and distributed by Gazprom, Russia\u2019s largest company, and the largest supplier of natural gas in the world.&#160; Republicans want control of that gas and have made two earlier attempts to snatch it.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Before GW Bush invaded Afghanistan, he buddied up to the Taliban to negotiate a pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Karachi to bring that gas under US control.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">After Bush invaded Afghanistan, he installed a Unocal (own part of Chevron) employee with expertise in gas pipelines, Hamid Karzai, as puppet President there.&#160; He then shifted the focus of US troops securing the route to build that pipeline.&#160; He failed.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">As long as Russia has a resource that Republicans want, they will look for ways to take it, making Russia their enemy.&#160; If they accuse Obama of being a communist with impunity, is it that far fetched that they would accuse Russia as well?<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Back to Rachel\u2019s piece, Lugar is right.&#160; Reid should call his party\u2019s bluff.&#160; But what will Reid do?&#160; I fear that he will do what he usually does: wag his tail, hump a few Republican legs begging for votes, whine, roll over and play dead.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s a given that the Republican party lacks anything resembling a a new idea, but some of their old ideas are downright scary.&#160; Did you know we still face a soviet threat?&#160; That\u2019s what one Republican Senator said, while trying to justify a policy that just may be a cover-up to hide a Republican threat <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/11\/18\/stopping-that-soviet-threat\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3401\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}