{"id":3239,"date":"2010-11-01T02:54:27","date_gmt":"2010-11-01T09:54:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=3239"},"modified":"2010-11-01T02:54:27","modified_gmt":"2010-11-01T09:54:27","slug":"ninth-to-rule-on-arizona-hate-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/11\/01\/ninth-to-rule-on-arizona-hate-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Ninth to Rule on Arizona Hate Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">The Ninth has selected the three judge panel that will hear the appeal of the Republican racial profiling law, SB1070.&#160; Based on that panel, I am confident that Jan Brewer and the the white supremacists behind the law will be crying in their sauerkraut.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px\" title=\"1sb1070\" border=\"0\" alt=\"1sb1070\" align=\"left\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/1sb1070.jpg\" width=\"334\" height=\"500\" \/>The federal appeals panel that will hear Arizona defend its sweeping law against illegal immigrants Monday consists of <strong>two Hispanics, one of them an immigrant, and a Republican appointee who often sides with immigrants in federal disputes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The judges chosen randomly to hear Arizona&#8217;s appeal to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco are John Noonan, an appointee of Ronald Reagan and a <strong>moderate<\/strong>; Richard Paez, a Bill Clinton appointee and <strong>the son of Mexican immigrants<\/strong>; and Carlos Bea, an appointee of George W. Bush who was <strong>born in Spain and was once ordered deported from the United States<\/strong>. He appealed and won.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;These are three judges who I think are pretty much in the judicial mainstream,&quot; said UC Berkeley constitutional law professor Jesse Choper. He predicted that Arizona would have a &quot;relatively steep, uphill battle&quot; because <strong>the federal government is given &quot;exclusive power for immigration and naturalization<\/strong>.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>The 9th Circuit and even the U.S. Supreme Court would probably be swayed by the federal government&#8217;s contention that the Arizona law &quot;improperly interferes with federal foreign policy,&quot; he said\u2026 [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-arizona-law-20101031,0,6875454.story\" target=\"_blank\">LA Times<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">To be clear, I am not saying that the judges\u2019 background will improperly influence their decision.&#160; There will certainly be much wailing and gnashing of teeth from Republican racists, but the law in this case is obviously clear.&#160; I think that their background will keep them from ignoring the facts, the law, and the Constitution, as SCOTUS did in <em>Citizens United<\/em>.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Ninth has selected the three judge panel that will hear the appeal of the Republican racial profiling law, SB1070.&#160; Based on that panel, I am confident that Jan Brewer and the the white supremacists behind the law will be crying in their sauerkraut. The federal appeals panel that will hear Arizona defend its sweeping <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/11\/01\/ninth-to-rule-on-arizona-hate-law\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}