{"id":31589,"date":"2018-02-26T12:12:06","date_gmt":"2018-02-26T20:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=31589"},"modified":"2018-02-26T12:29:38","modified_gmt":"2018-02-26T20:29:38","slug":"dreamers-can-celebrate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2018\/02\/26\/dreamers-can-celebrate\/","title":{"rendered":"DREAMers Can Celebrate"},"content":{"rendered":"

The reason that Democrats agreed to a deal preventing a government shutdown, without reaching a deal to safeguard DREAMers first, is that on January 9, Judge William Alsup ordered the Trump Reich to restart DACA, thus declaring Trump’s termination of DACA, unconstitutional, pending final judicial review, which in this case, can only end in the Supreme Court. The Trump Reich appealed and asked the Supreme Court to strike down Alsup’s injunction immediately.\u00a0 They declined, so DREAMers can celebrate.\u00a0 The March 5 deadline is no more.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"0226AmericaRacist\"<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court handed President Trump a significant defeat Monday, turning down the administration’s plea for a quick ruling on the president’s power to end special protections for so-called Dreamers.<\/p>\n

The court’s decision not to hear the administration’s appeal immediately could keep in place a legal shield for the nearly 700,000 young immigrants for the rest of this year, and perhaps longer.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department had sought to leapfrog the U.S. appeals courts in California and New York. The department had asked for an “immediate review” of a nationwide order by U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco that required the government to maintain for now the Obama-era program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA.<\/p>\n

The action the administration sought was rare. It has been nearly 30 years since the Supreme Court granted review of a district judge’s ruling before an appeals court could weigh in. And the court said Monday it had no interest in following that course in the DACA case.<\/p>\n

The justices, without dissent, turned down the administration’s petition “without prejudice,” meaning that the government could return to the high court once the appeals court rules…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <LA Times<\/a>><\/span><\/p>\n

Here’s video<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n