{"id":276,"date":"2009-11-19T02:48:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T10:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=276"},"modified":"2009-11-19T02:48:00","modified_gmt":"2009-11-19T10:48:00","slug":"district-court-rules-against-army-corps-of-engineers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2009\/11\/19\/district-court-rules-against-army-corps-of-engineers\/","title":{"rendered":"District Court Rules Against Army Corps of Engineers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was frankly surprised by this ruling, because the Corps of Engineers is immune from suit for damages resulting from building substandard infrastructure like levees that failed.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\"><a href=\"http:\/\/s217.photobucket.com\/albums\/cc83\/TomCat1948or2\/Blog%202009\/DistrictCourtRulesAgainstArmyCorpsofEngi_1D2D\/KatrinaLevee.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Katrina-Levee\" style=\"border-top-width: 0px; display: inline; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; border-right-width: 0px\" height=\"269\" alt=\"Katrina-Levee\" src=\"http:\/\/s217.photobucket.com\/albums\/cc83\/TomCat1948or2\/Blog%202009\/DistrictCourtRulesAgainstArmyCorpsofEngi_1D2D\/KatrinaLevee_thumb.jpg\" width=\"404\" align=\"right\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a> In a ruling that could leave the government open to billions of dollars in claims from Hurricane Katrina victims, a federal judge said late Wednesday that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had displayed &quot;gross negligence&quot; in failing to maintain a navigation channel &#8212; resulting in levee breaches that flooded large swaths of greater New Orleans.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">U.S. District Judge Stanwood R. Duval peppered his 156-page decision, issued in New Orleans, with harsh criticism of the Army corps, at one point citing its &quot;insouciance, myopia and shortsightedness&quot; in failing to maintain the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, known locally as MRGO.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">For more than 40 years, the judge said, the corps had known that a crucial levee protecting suburban St. Bernard Parish and the Lower 9th Ward neighborhood would be compromised by the deterioration of the channel. The corps had &quot;myriad&quot; ways to address the problem, he wrote, but failed to do so.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">Duval awarded a total of $719,000 to a small group of flood victims that sued the government in April 2006.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">But according to Pierce O&#8217;Donnell, the lead plaintiff&#8217;s counsel, <strong>roughly 100,000 New Orleans-area residents and businesses who have filed flood-damage claims with the Army corps were now potentially eligible for payment<\/strong>.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">In a phone interview, O&#8217;Donnell hailed what he called a historic ruling, one that backed the widely held contention in New Orleans that the 2005 catastrophe was not just the fault of Mother Nature.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">&quot;The judge agreed with us that Katrina was not a natural disaster,&quot; O&#8217;Donnell said. &quot;<strong>Katrina was a man-made disaster caused by the Army Corps of Engineers<\/strong>.&quot;<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">In a statement Wednesday, the Army corps said only that the opinion was being reviewed by lawyers from the Army and Justice Department. &quot;We have no further comment at this time as the issues involved in the case are still subject to further litigation,&quot; the corps said.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">At the heart of the case was maintenance and operation of the <strong>Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet<\/strong>.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">The channel, which was decommissioned after Katrina, was completed in the 1960s as a shipping shortcut between New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico. Over the years, the marshy banks of the channel had widened significantly in spots &#8212; and long before Katrina hit, experts had warned that the destruction of wetlands could create a funnel effect that would intensify storm surges.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">During the trial, attorneys for the government argued that the Army Corps of Engineers was not liable for the post-hurricane flooding because it was immune from civil lawsuits questioning federal flood policy decisions.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#000000\">But Duval found that such &quot;gross negligence&quot; overrode any immunity claim\u2026 [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nation-and-world\/la-na-katrina-flooding19-2009nov19,0,3370102.story\" target=\"_blank\">LA Times<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p>The basis for the judges decision was that the Mississippi Gulf-River Outlet was not faulty workmanship or maintenance.&#160; It was negligent planning that altered the environment in a way that created the conditions necessary for the flood surge to occur.&#160; This is not over by a long shot.&#160; If the decision survives the Court of Appeals, it will likely end up in SCOTUS.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was frankly surprised by this ruling, because the Corps of Engineers is immune from suit for damages resulting from building substandard infrastructure like levees that failed. In a ruling that could leave the government open to billions of dollars in claims from Hurricane Katrina victims, a federal judge said late Wednesday that the U.S. <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2009\/11\/19\/district-court-rules-against-army-corps-of-engineers\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}