{"id":2391,"date":"2010-07-30T02:08:45","date_gmt":"2010-07-30T09:08:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=2391"},"modified":"2010-07-30T02:08:45","modified_gmt":"2010-07-30T09:08:45","slug":"charlie-resign-and-thank-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2010\/07\/30\/charlie-resign-and-thank-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Charlie, Resign and Thank You"},"content":{"rendered":"

I\u2019m sad to say that Washington, DC offers so many opportunities for graft that many honest politicians have succumbed to the temptations there.  Although Charlie Rangel has served his district and the people of America long and well, it\u2019s time for him to accept our thanks and resign.<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\"30rangel\"<\/a> In laying out 13 charges of ethical violations committed by Representative Charles B. Rangel, the House ethics committee set the stage for a rare public trial of the Democratic Congressman this fall, a potential embarrassment for the Democratic leadership during the election season.<\/p>\n

The unveiling of the charges Thursday came even as Mr. Rangel\u2019s lawyers suggested they were trying to reach a settlement to avoid such a fate for Mr. Rangel, 80, a Harlem Democrat. <\/p>\n

Ethics committee members appeared somber on Thursday, expressing fondness for Mr. Rangel even as they issued the stinging report, which states that Mr. Rangel\u2019s \u201cactions reflected poorly on the institution of the House and, thereby, brought discredit to the House.\u201d <\/p>\n

Mr. Rangel did not appear at the meeting on Thursday, but issued a written response denying \u201ceach and every allegation\u201d and criticizing the committee\u2019s report as \u201cdeeply flawed in its factual premises and legal theories.\u201d <\/p>\n

In the 40-page report, the committee said it substantiated the major charges that had been hanging over Mr. Rangel for two years: that he improperly used his office to solicit donations for a school to be named in his honor; failed to pay taxes on and report rental income from his Dominican villa; filed incomplete financial disclosure forms; and improperly accepted from a Manhattan developer rent-stabilized apartments, one of which he used as a campaign office. <\/p>\n

But while those alleged infractions had been widely reported, the committee unearthed new details about Mr. Rangel\u2019s conduct. The committee said Mr. Rangel not only reached out to corporate executives seeking contributions to the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College, but he also personally sought donations from registered lobbyists whose corporations had business before Congress. In some cases, Mr. Rangel asked for contributions of as much as $30 million from businesses with issues before the Ways and Means Committee, of which he was the chairman until March. <\/p>\n

\u201cReasonable persons could construe contributions to the Rangel Center by persons with interests before the Ways and Means Committee as influencing the performance of Respondent\u2019s governmental duties,\u201d the report stated, saying it violated the Congressional Code of Ethics. <\/p>\n

In addition, Mr. Rangel, when he secured a rent-stabilized apartment for his campaign operation at the Lenox Terrace development in Harlem, signed an application saying that the apartment would be the primary residence for his son, Steven Rangel, and not be used for business purposes, the report said. Steven Rangel never lived in the apartment, and the committee said the developer, the Olnick Organization, included Mr. Rangel on a \u201cspecial handling list,\u201d apparently for V.I.P.\u2019s, and did not take action against him even as it cracked down on other tenants whose apartments were not being used as primary residences. <\/p>\n

The report suggested that, after 20 terms in Congress, Mr. Rangel had come to rely on his government-paid staff for activities unrelated to his Congressional work\u2026 <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Inserted from <NY Times<\/a>><\/p>\n

But what about innocent until proven guilty?  I can certainly see Republicans trying to shaft him if he were innocent.  Nothing frightens a Republican more than integrity.  But the Democrats on the committee agree.  If Rangel were acquitted, voters will believe it was a cover-up.  From what I know of the evidence, I think he\u2019s guilty.  With that belief, I would be a hypocrite, if I did call for him to resign, as I have over so very many Republican scandals.  In addition,  Democrats promised to clean up the culture of corruption.  Unless we keep that pledge, we\u2019re just like Republicans.<\/font><\/p>\n

Sorry Charlie.  Nobody can take away all the good you have done.  For the good of America, for the good of the party, for the good of your own party, say goodbye.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I\u2019m sad to say that Washington, DC offers so many opportunities for graft that many honest politicians have succumbed to the temptations there.  Although Charlie Rangel has served his district and the people of America long and well, it\u2019s time for him to accept our thanks and resign. In laying out 13 charges of ethical […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2391"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2391\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}