{"id":17386,"date":"2015-11-12T12:38:03","date_gmt":"2015-11-12T20:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=17386"},"modified":"2015-11-12T12:47:18","modified_gmt":"2015-11-12T20:47:18","slug":"squatchs-open-thread-121115","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2015\/11\/12\/squatchs-open-thread-121115\/","title":{"rendered":"Squatch’s Open Thread 12\/11\/15"},"content":{"rendered":"

Well it poured rain last night, pinging off the rain spout at a ferocious rate.  I was very glad to be inside!  The rain continues this morning but not hard like last night.  Thanks to Lona who sent me a fresh supply of cat naps.  I availed myself of two yesterday which was good for the cold\/cough.  Today is scheduled to be a low key day with laundry a prime concern.  Can't have a "furless" sasquatch!<\/span><\/p>\n

Puzzle — <\/strong>Today’s took me 3:51 (average 6:11). To do it, <\/span>click here<\/strong><\/span><\/a>. How did you do? For those that don't know, we always do the 48 piece classic.<\/span><\/p>\n

Short Takes<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The New Yorker<\/span><\/a><\/strong> — To winnow the field of candidates who would hold the main stage in the second G.O.P. debate, in September, CNN had intended to use the average of national polls conducted over the summer. But after Carly Fiorina’s campaign complained that the method was unfair CNN changed its formula. The decision had very little to do with American democracy or social science. It had to do with the practice of American journalism. It would make better television if Fiorina was on the same stage as Trump, since he’d made comments about her appearance. (“Look at that face!” he said.)<\/p>\n

“No one tells me what to say,” Trump had said in August. By September, on the defensive about Fiorina, he insisted—he knew—that he had the will of the people behind him. “If you look at the polls,” he said, “a lot of people like the way I talk.”<\/p>\n

Donald Trump is a creature of the polls. He is his numbers. But he is only a sign of the times. Turning the press into pollsters has made American political culture Trumpian: frantic, volatile, shortsighted, sales-driven, and anti-democratic.<\/p>\n

He kept his lead nearly till the end of October. “Do we love these polls?” he called out to a crowd in Iowa. “Somebody said, ‘You love polls.’ I said that’s only because I’ve been winning every single one of them. Right? Right? Every single poll.” Two days later, when he lost his lead in Iowa to Ben Carson, he’d grown doubtful: “I honestly think those polls are wrong.” By the week of the third G.O.P. debate, he’d fallen behind in a national CBS\/NYT poll. “The thing with these polls, they’re all so different,” Trump said, mournfully. “It’s not very scientific.” <\/p>\n

This is a long but interesting article about polling and the reliance on and influence of polls in the electoral process. The uneducated mind may rely on polls too much as politicians may rely on them to inform their policy positions rather than listening to their constituents.  Click through for the rest of this article.<\/span><\/p>\n

Think Progress<\/strong><\/span><\/a> — <\/span>In August, New York-based Amalgamated Bank announced<\/a> it would immediately raise its minimum pay to at least $15 an hour.<\/p>\n

At the time, the bank noted that it was the first to make such an announcement. But it’s also committed to making sure more follow its lead.<\/p>\n

The bank, which is owned by the union OPEIU, came to the $15 wage floor in the midst of contract negotiations with the union. The contract also specifies automatic 3 percent increases each year, ensuring annual raises for its workforce. “It’s a bold move,” said CEO Keith Mestrich. “We need to be bold like that.”<\/p>\n

This is great news!  When I started as a teller, I was paid about $1.55 per hour.  That was 45 years ago.  But even then, I could not afford to share an apartment with rent of $250 per month.  Click through for the rest of the story.<\/span><\/p>\n

Huffington Post<\/strong><\/span><\/a> — Republican presidential candidates debated once again on economic issues and offered some misleading takes on jobs, tax plans, immigrants and state budgets.<\/p>\n