{"id":13162,"date":"2014-07-04T00:12:12","date_gmt":"2014-07-04T07:12:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=13162"},"modified":"2014-07-04T00:12:12","modified_gmt":"2014-07-04T07:12:12","slug":"ginsburgs-dissent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/04\/ginsburgs-dissent\/","title":{"rendered":"Ginsburg&#8217;s Dissent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">I have read Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg\u2019s dissent to the ruling in <em>Hobby Lobby<\/em> by the Fascist Five Injustices of SCROTUS (Republican Constitutional VD).&#160; I recommend that you read it too (link follows).&#160; As an easier reference found an article with an excellent summary of ten key points.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"0704ginsburg\" style=\"border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: left; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px\" border=\"0\" alt=\"0704ginsburg\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/0704ginsburg.jpg\" width=\"360\" align=\"left\" height=\"268\" \/>Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a scathing 35-page dissent in the disastrous 5-4 Supreme Court decision Monday granting corporations First Amendment religious rights to deny women birth control coverage. The court had ventured far out in to unprecedented territory by granting private companies the right to be exempt from laws their owners don&#8217;t agree with. Crazy! In their zeal to deny women access to reproductive healthcare, expand the rights of corporations and hurt Obamacare, &quot;The court,&quot; she wrote, &quot;has ventured into a minefield.&quot;&#160; <\/p>\n<p>Sadly, her clear-eyed reasoning did not sway the Court&#8217;s five arch conservatives, but it is worth reading <a href=\"http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/mojo\/2014\/06\/supreme-court-hobby-lobby-ruling-document\" target=\"_blank\">her dissent here<\/a> (starts on page 60.) <\/p>\n<p>For those in a bigger hurry, here are highlights: <\/p>\n<p>1. &quot;Would the exemption\u2026extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]\u2026Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today&#8217;s decision.&quot; <\/p>\n<p>2. &quot;<strong>Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be &#8216;perceived as favoring one religion over another,&#8217; the very &#8216;risk the [Constitution&#8217;s] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude<\/strong>.&quot; <\/p>\n<p>3. &quot;Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. <strong>Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community<\/strong>.&quot; \u2026 [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/civil-liberties\/10-blistering-highlights-justice-ruth-bader-ginsburgs-hobby-lobby-dissent\" target=\"_blank\">Alternet<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">I have shared three to the articles ten highlights.&#160; Click through for the other seven.&#160; I not only agree with Ginsberg in sll ten highlights, but also with her entire dissent.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have read Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg\u2019s dissent to the ruling in Hobby Lobby by the Fascist Five Injustices of SCROTUS (Republican Constitutional VD).&#160; I recommend that you read it too (link follows).&#160; As an easier reference found an article with an excellent summary of ten key points. Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a scathing 35-page <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2014\/07\/04\/ginsburgs-dissent\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13162\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}