{"id":10960,"date":"2013-08-27T01:44:00","date_gmt":"2013-08-27T08:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/?p=10960"},"modified":"2013-08-27T02:35:00","modified_gmt":"2013-08-27T09:35:00","slug":"keystone-xl-would-increase-carbon-pollution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2013\/08\/27\/keystone-xl-would-increase-carbon-pollution\/","title":{"rendered":"Keystone XL WOULD Increase Carbon Pollution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Barack Obama has said that the only way he will approve Keystone XL is if it can be shown that it will not significantly increase atmospheric carbon.&nbsp; So the State Department, which is, by the way, Hillary&rsquo;s domain, hired a contractor with ties to TransCanada Corporation, and they produced a bogus report.&nbsp; Now we have evidence that the Canadian government knows that it&rsquo;s bogus, because they know Keystone XL will increase carbon pollution.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s why.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"left\" alt=\"27Keystone\" border=\"0\" height=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.7thstep.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/27Keystone.jpg\" style=\"border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; background-image: none; border-bottom-width: 0px; float: left; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px; border-top-width: 0px\" title=\"27Keystone\" width=\"360\" \/>Ever since President Obama said in June that a litmus test for the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada was whether it would &ldquo;significantly&rdquo; worsen global warming, Canadian government officials have insisted it would not.<\/p>\n<p>They reasoned that because the pipeline would not have any major effect on rate of development of Canada&rsquo;s oil sands, as a State Department <a href=\"http:\/\/www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\">environmental review<\/a> concluded in March, it would not significantly raise the amount of carbon emitted.<\/p>\n<p>But documents obtained by a Canadian environmental group suggest that the staff at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nrcan.gc.ca\/home\" target=\"_blank\">Natural Resources Canada<\/a> viewed <strong>Keystone XL as an important tool for expanding oil sands production<\/strong>. The documents were released to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pembina.org\" target=\"_blank\">Pembina Institute<\/a>, a group based in Calgary, Alberta, after a request made under Canada&rsquo;s Access to Information Act.<\/p>\n<p>Briefing notes prepared for the natural resources minister, Joe Oliver, before a trip to Chicago to promote Keystone XL in March, noted that <strong>&ldquo;in order for crude oil production to grow, the North American pipeline network must be expanded through initiatives, such as the Keystone XL Pipeline project.&rdquo; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Clare Demerse, director of federal policy for Pembina, said in an interview on Saturday that expanding crude oil production in Canada is synonymous with developing the oil sands. Canada has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.capp.ca\/library\/statistics\/basic\/Pages\/default.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">168 billion barrels of oil sands<\/a> reserves compared to about 4.1 billion barrels of conventional oil reserves&hellip; [<em>emphasis added<\/em>]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Inserted from &lt;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/08\/26\/business\/global\/canadian-documents-suggest-shift-on-pipeline.html\" target=\"_blank\">NY Times<\/a>&gt;<\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">Photo credit: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.earthtimes.org\/encyclopaedia\/environmental-issues\/climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\">Earth Times<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n<p><font color=\"#0000ff\">The bottom line requires no rocket science.&nbsp; If Keystone XL would cause oil sands production to grow, more crude oil of the dirtiest kind would be refined and used, and that would increase carbon pollution.&nbsp; QED.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Barack Obama has said that the only way he will approve Keystone XL is if it can be shown that it will not significantly increase atmospheric carbon.&nbsp; So the State Department, which is, by the way, Hillary&rsquo;s domain, hired a contractor with ties to TransCanada Corporation, and they produced a bogus report.&nbsp; Now we have <a href='https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/2013\/08\/27\/keystone-xl-would-increase-carbon-pollution\/' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10960","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","category-5-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10960"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10960\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.politicsplus.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}