I think Jerry may well be the only person still with us from the time Politics Plus was on Blogger, and there was only one voice on cable news that defended the progressive view. He did it so well well that he butted heads with management, lost his job, and retreated back to sports broadcasting for ESPN. I am very grateful that Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O’Donnell, and Tim Hayes are filling his shoes, but I cannot be more pleased that Keith Olbermann has returned to political reporting. Here he is with 192 reasons Trump should not be President.
Every few generations, we Americans are called upon to defend our country. To defend it not so much from foreign dictators or war or terrorism, but from those here who have no commitment to progress or democracy or representative government—no commitment to anything except their own out-of-control minds and the bottomless pits of their egos.
Our society has thrown up these people before: Joseph McCarthy. George Wallace. Father Coughlin. Jefferson Davis. Aaron Burr. The Know-Nothings. The Blacklisters. The America-Firsters. And we have always thrown them out.
And now our generation has its own: the most dangerous individual ever nominated by a major party for the highest office in this country…
Yesterday I took a trip to the mailbox and the store. I almost did not make it home, because my nether regions have still not recovered fully. I’m current with replies. Tomorrow I have housework to do.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today it took me 3:58 (average 4:55). To do it, click here. How did you do?
From MoveOn: Rewriting The Word ‘Liberal,’ By Lawrence O’Donnell
I could not have said it better.
From Common Dreams: Environmental group Friends of the Earth, represented by Earthjustice, sued the State Department yesterday to gain access to communications between the department and lobbyists who pushed for approval of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.
This is something I fully support. We need to root out the corruption in the State Department, no matter how high up it goes.
From Current: Rating tax plans: Robert Reich compares the strategies put forth by Obama and GOP challengers
Keith and Robert Reich make it crystal clear. Republicans do NOT represent YOU!
After politicizing women’s health by tying their so-called charity to Republican misogyny, the Susan G. Komen continues to struggle to regain standing without coming clean about what they did and why they did it. The Republican ideologue who spearheaded Komen’s war on women’s rights stepped down today.
Karen Handel, a Republican who once ran for governor of Georgia on a platform calling for the defunding of Planned Parenthood, stepped down from her role as the charity’s senior vice president for public policy and chief lobbyist, the organization said on Tuesday.
"I have known Karen for many years and we both share a common commitment to our organization’s lifelong mission, which must always remain our sole focus," Komen founder Nancy Brinker said in a statement. "I wish her the best in future endeavors."
Planned Parenthood, a leading provider of birth control, abortion and other women’s health services, had no comment.
Komen’s move last week caused an uproar among supporters who also back Planned Parenthood. Komen reversed the decision on Friday.
Many had accused Komen of initially bowing to political pressure from anti-abortion groups who want to cut off all funds to Planned Parenthood. The charity says it had been guided by a new policy to avoid funding organizations under investigation by authorities.
In a Fox News interview, Handel charged Planned Parenthood with using "vicious attacks" and "coercion" to prevent Komen from setting its own standards. "It’s outrageous," said Handel, whose appointment to Komen’s leadership last April raised the hackles of pro-abortion activists… [emphasis added]
Yesterday I slept late, paid bills and did paperwork. I’m current with replies. We have a special treat today. The daily cartoon was made by SoINeedAName, aka Nameless. Today I have a lot of housework to do.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today it took me 6:01 (average 7:06). To do it, click here. How did you do?
From NY Times: Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, on Friday called off a scheduled vote on the online antipiracy bill that had rallied the World Wide Web and rocked Capitol Hill, and House leaders took steps to slow legislation as well. Taking to the medium that helped organize extensive protests against the legislation, Mr. Reid, Democrat of Nevada, announced a delay in the vote via the social media Web site Twitter. But he indicated the issue, which had been scheduled for a vote Tuesday, had not died.
Woooo Hoooo!! Here’s Keith with Markos Moulitsas on Countdown.
Thank goodness for Oregon’s Ron Wyden!
From NY Daily News: A fake CNN email claiming that Newt Gingrich pressured his ex-wife to have an abortion made the rounds Friday – the latest entry in South Carolina’s infamous history of dirty political tricks.
The message, which was sent from a phony account made to look like a CNN breaking news alert, was sent out to dozens of state Republican activists.
This is important only because it is a harbinger of what will come in the general election. Remember that Karl “Turd Blossom” Rove is Romney’s campaign mentor, and this has his fingerprints all over it.
From CBS: The Supreme Court on Friday threw out electoral maps drawn by federal judges in Texas that favored minorities. The decision ultimately could affect control of the U.S. House of Representatives and leaves the fate of Texas’ April primaries unclear.
The justices ordered the three-judge court in San Antonio to come up with new plans that pay more attention to maps created by Texas’ Republican-dominated state Legislature. All four of the state’s new congressional seats could swing based on the outcome.
But the Supreme Court did not compel the use of the state’s maps in this year’s elections, as Texas wanted. Only Justice Clarence Thomas said he would have gone that far.
I expected the fascist five of SCROTUS to goose step, but this still isn’t over. Even if the three judge court does cave, Texas still needs DOJ approval due to their record of extreme racism in drawing districts.
Cartoon: (by SoINeedAName aka Nameless: I just added the URL and border.) Thanks Nameless!
Some say that what a person does at home is private and should not be made a part of political discussions. To an extent I agree, but when that candidate is making his morality a campaign issue and has a history of condemning others over moral issues, it is an issue, not because of the moral lapse, but because of the hypocrisy.
Dredging up a past that Newt Gingrich has worked hard to bury, the GOP presidential candidate’s second ex-wife says Gingrich asked for an "open marriage" in which he could have both a wife and a mistress.
In an interview with ABC News’ "Nightline" scheduled to air Thursday night, Marianne Gingrich said she refused to go along with the idea that she share her husband with Callista Bisek, who would later become his third wife.
The explosive interview was airing just two days before the presidential primary in South Carolina, a state with a strong Christian conservative bent, and as Gingrich tries to present himself as the strongest alternative to front-runner Mitt Romney.
In excerpts of the interview released ahead the ABC broadcast, Marianne Gingrich said her husband conducted his affair with Callista "in my bedroom in our apartment in Washington" while she was elsewhere.
"He always called me at night and always ended with `I love you,’" she said. "Well, she was listening."
Marianne Gingrich, who was Gingrich’s second wife, said Gingrich told her "Callista doesn’t care what I do."
"He was asking to have an open marriage and I refused," she said. "That is not a marriage."
She also said Gingrich moved to divorce her just months after she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.
"He also was advised by the doctor when I was sitting there that I was not to be under stress," she said. "He knew."… [emphasis added]
We need to remember that the request came six years after the affair began, and while this was going on Gingrich was leading the charge to impeach Bill Clinton. The de-facto head of the Republican Party jumped immediately to Newt’s support.
Limabugh [sic], who could fairly be described as a proudchauvinist, said, “I don’t understand why the media’s pretending to be so upset” about Gingrich’s behavior with his ex, Marianne. Limbaugh went on to read a “great note” from a “good friend of mine,” which posits that Newt and not Marianne — whom Gingirch left shortly after she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis — is the real “victim” here. Moreover, the fact that Gingrich asked for “permission” to cheat on his wife is “a mark of character, in my book,” Limbaugh continued [Limbaugh delinked]:
LIMBAUGH: I got a great note from a friend of mine. “So Newt wanted an open marriage. BFD. At least he asked his wife for permission instead of cheating on her. That’s a mark of character, in my book. Newt’s a victim. We all are. Ours is the horniest generation.” […] That’s from a good friend of mine, “Newt’s slogan ought to, ‘Hell, yes, I wanted it.’” (laughing) I’m sharing with you how some people are reacting to this.
It’s worth noting that Gingrich had been having an affair for several years before he asked “permission” to cheat on his wife.
That do as I say, not as I do attitude is so Republican. Limbaugh’s attitude reflects Newt’s well, because Newt had been appalled that Marianne would insist on having him all to herself.
Then came the Republican debate.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich slammed CNN host John King for asking about an explosive ABC News report claiming the White House hopeful asked his former wife for an "open marriage" before they later divorced.
"I think the destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run of for public office and I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that," Gingrich said.
"Every person in here knows personal pain. Every person in here has had someone close to them go through painful things. To take an ex-wife, and make it two days before the primary a sign question in a presidential campaign, is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine," Gingrich said… [emphasis added]
Where was his indignation, when he was condemning Clinton?
Keith Olbermann covers this and other Republican candidates with Ken Vogel on Countdown.
Patriotism made him do it? Really? I’ll have a load of that for the front lawn.
Of course the Theocon take on this is that Gingrich has repented and changed his ways. I certainly agree that people are redeemable, and no matter what they have done they are capable of reform. However, I see absolutely no evidence that Newt has reformed in any way. He is still lies about the affair. And he still has the same haughty attitude, condemning all who do not share his pseudo-Christian values.
Nevertheless, Republican Supply-side pseudo-Christians only count the sins of Democrats and always excuse their own. So for the moment, I think Newt’s newties are safe.
Yesterday I slept late and took a long nap, so I did not get started on planned tasks. That’s OK, I obviously needed the rest, and I got my research done. I’m current on replies. Today I still have that paperwork to do.
Jig Zone Puzzle:
Today it took me 4:29 (average 6:21). To do it, click here. How did you do?
From The Guardian: Barack Obama has taken a big step towards preserving one of the world’s natural wonders, banning uranium mining on 1m acres of land around the Grand Canyon.
The move, announced by the interior secretary, Ken Salazar, at a film screening in Washington, bans new mining claims around the canyon for the next 20 years. The area is rich in uranium deposits.
I’ve been to the canyon enough times that I’m glad to see that unique vista is being protected, despite Republican attempts to despoil it. Kudos to Obama.
This represents Republican wishful thinking at it’s worst.
From Washington Post: Despite his absence from early primary coverage, Current TV’s Keith Olbermann will soon be part of the act.
In a tweet posted Sunday, the volatile anchor of the “Countdown” show said he would be “running the election coverage of Current” after Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary. On Monday, a Current representative confirmed Olbermann would host future coverage.
I’m glad to see this. Current’s election coverage has been sub-par without their best at the helm.