House Republicans have just put together a transportation bill so horrid, that even Obama’s Republican Secretary of Transportation has called it “the worst transportation bill” he had ever seen.  The crux of this measure is gutting federal support for public transit, a slap in the faces of poor Americans, minorities and environmentalists, while providing benefits for Big Oil.

10MAXHouse Republicans have released a transportation bill that would eliminate the government’s dedicated funding stream for mass transit, instead counting on a plan that the Congressional Budget Office found would cover just 5 percent of transit costs. The New York Times called the bill “uniquely terrible,” while Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a Republican, called it “the worst transportation bill I’ve ever seen during 35 years of public service.”

Cuts to mass transit fall hard on low-income people who count on public transportation to get to work, go to school, and go about their lives. And they fall hardest on low-income minorities, who, as the research organization PolicyLink noted, as disproportionately likely to not own an automobile:

As housing and jobs have moved farther apart, the distance has created employment barriers for anyone without unlimited ability to drive. Nineteen percent of African Americans and 13.7 percent of Latinos lack access to automobiles, compared with 4.6 percent of whites. Poverty complicates the problem: 33 percent of poor African Americans and 25 percent of poor Latinos lack automobile access, compared with 12.1 percent of poor whites. Cars owned by low-income people tend to be older, less reliable, and less fuel-efficient. This makes commuting to work unpredictable and more expensive, at best.

“Communities of color, low-income Americans and people with disabilities will be disproportionately impacted since they are the most transit dependent communities and negotiate their daily lives on mass transportation to reach employment, health care, and educational centers,” said the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “These funding provisions will impact the millions of Americans who rely on public transit systems to get to work, to school, or to the doctor,” agreed the American Transit Association.

In addition to shortchanging transit and those who depend on it, the bill would also open up nearly all of America’s coastal waters to oil drilling… [emphasis original]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

As a disabled American, I depend on busses and the train pictured above to get around, but I used public transit exclusively, even before that was the case, because it reduced my own carbon footprint.  As if the increased pollution and congestion from additional automobile use were not bad enough, Republicans have also slipped “drill, baby drill” into the bill as well.  This measure must be defeated in the Senate.

Share
 

Yesterday I got some paperwork done, but no housework as I seem to have strained my back.  I’m current with replies.  Today I’ll try to get a haircut again.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 4:02 (average 5:12).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From NY Times: House Republican leaders appear ready to bow to election-year pressure and pass a bill banning lawmakers from using nonpublic information they hear on the job to make financial investments. The House legislation, however, is missing two vital provisions that are in the Senate bill that won overwhelming approval last week.

The first provision requires that members of the budding “political intelligence” industry — that sells information gleaned from private talks with lawmakers and staffers — register like lobbyists and disclose Hill activities. The second provision strengthens criminal law to facilitate corruption investigations of public officials.

Both these provisions deserve enactment, but the Republican majority leader, Representative Eric Cantor, struck them from the House measure.

Republicans would not want to outlaw their favorite practices.

From MoveOn: Ellen DeGeneres Fights Bigotry — And Wins!

 video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Republican haters are motivators for us all. Her creed is far more Christian that the Republican Supply-side pseudo-Christian false gospel of hate.

From Reuters: President Barack Obama said on Thursday he was granting 10 U.S. states exemptions from parts of the "No Child Left Behind" education law, a move that could prove popular in an election year with parents and teachers who have criticized the law.

"After waiting far too long for Congress to reform No Child Left Behind, my administration is giving states the opportunity to set higher, more honest standards in exchange for more flexibility," Obama said in a statement.

"Today, we’re giving 10 states the green light to continue making reforms that are best for them," said Obama.

Obama is doing what he can, because Republicans refuse to act.

Cartoon:

10Cartoon

Share
 

Yesterday I did some housework.  I also pulled my warmest winter clothing down from high storage shelves and put my shorts and other summer clothing up.  I should have done it weeks ago, but I was ill, and this is the first time I have felt up to it.  I’m current with replies.  Today I have more paperwork and housework to do.

Jig-Zone Puzzles:

Today it took me 4:04 (average 5:13).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From Talk 2 Action: On Friday night Newt Gingrich spoke at the "Prayer for America" event at the International Church of Las Vegas (ICLV) led by Apostle Paul Goulet.  Jim Garlow, a member of the campaign’s national Faith Leaders Coalition, introduced Gingrich and promoted a pastors’ revolt against IRS rules that prohibit endorsement of a political candidate from the pulpit.

In short, Newt Gingrich is advising Republican Supply-side pseudo-Christian pastors to break the law.  Many do not realize that churches may advocate issues without violating the terms of their 501(c)(3) tax exemption.  However they may not endorse candidates.  That is a condition to which they voluntarily agreed as part of their application for 501(c)(3) tax exempt status.  Any church whose pastor violates this condition should be stripped of the status.

From Reuters: Boehner, the top U.S. Republican, said Obama should reverse the rule, which requires health insurance plans, including those offered by Catholic charities, hospitals and universities, to provide birth control to women.

Boehner said if the president refuses to rescind the measure, Congress will do so itself through the legislative process.

In the Senate, Bought Bitch Mitch said the same thing.  Tomorrow’s cartoon will have more on this.

From Huffington Post: A Kansas House committee is scheduled to take up a bill Wednesday that would exempt doctors from malpractice suits if they withheld medical information to prevent an abortion. The measure would also take away tax credits for abortion providers, remove tax deductions for the purchase of abortion-related insurance coverage and require women to hear the fetal heartbeat. The bill includes several provisions, which passed in other states and now face federal lawsuits. The bill would also require women be told about potential breast cancer risks from abortions, even though medical experts discount such a connection.

Effectively, Republicans are proposing that doctors be held responsible if they fail to tell GOP lies about abortion, but not to be required to tell the truth about it.

Cartoon:

9Cartoon

Share
 

Republicans find themselves in a dilemma.  They claim to be the party of tax cuts, and they don’t want you to know that the only tax cuts they really care about are for millionaires, billionaires and corporate criminals.  They have already earned some very bad PR trying to block the payroll tax cut extension.  With the need to renew it fast approaching, they can either keep holding workers hostage trying to blackmail Democrats for something they want, or they can give a tax cut to working people, without getting welfare for the super-rich in return, an anathema to Republicans.  It appears that their early attempts at economic terrorism through blackmail are not working.

6payrolltaxSenate Democrats have begun preparing a backup plan to extend a tax cut for workers if a special congressional negotiating committee fails to reach quick agreement, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Friday.

Reid’s comments, in a conference call with reporters, were seen by some congressional aides as a signal to Republicans that he is prepared to play hard ball on an issue that favors Democrats in an election year.

House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, the top Republican in Congress, has struggled to convince rank-and-file members to lay aside their doubts about the stimulative effect of the tax cut. Party leaders fear being punished in the polls if it is allowed to expire at the end of the month.

Word of Reid’s backup plan on the payroll tax cut ignited a sharp response from Boehner, who complained that Democrats had yet to offer any serious proposals in negotiations… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Reuters>

Reid is not talking about what this backup plan may be, but I’m certain it will involve bringing measures to the Senate floor that force Senate Republicans to either approve the payroll tax cut extension, no strings attached, or filibuster to prevent its passage.

Democrats should stand absolutely firm on this issue.

Share
 

If Josh Fox were a protestor, posing as a journalist, to disrupt a congressional hearing I could understand refusing him access.  That is not the case.  Josh Fox is an Academy Award nominated documentarian.  The Republicans on House Science Committee’s Subcommittee on Energy had a good reason for refusing access to Fox.  They were putting on a dog and pony show disguised as a hearing.  In it they paraded lobbyists and representatives of the gas industry to “testify” on the safety and efficacy of fracking, in an attempt to minimize an EPA report, while refusing testimony from scientists with sound research data in opposition to fracking.  Josh Fox is an expert on Fracking.  He made Gasland.  To hide the truth, in my opinion, Republicans had him arrested.

3JoshFoxYesterday, Academy Award-nominated documentarian Josh Fox was arrested by U.S. Capitol police while trying to film a public Congressional Hearing. Isn’t this the kind of chilling free speech episode we Americans condemn when it happens in other countries?

The U.S. House Science Committee’s Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment was holding a public hearing, and Fox was there with his camera crew to get footage for a documentary film. According to press reports, the Subcommittee’s Chairman exercised his authority to bar filming by individuals without proper House of Representatives’ press credentials. Fox persisted, was arrested by Capitol Police, and charged with unlawful entry.

Fox says that he repeatedly sought permission in advance to film the public hearing, but those requests were denied by the House Committee. By all accounts, there was plenty of room for the camera, and the film crew was not interfering with the hearing. One Representative made just that point, and asked that the rules be waived so that Fox might stay. That request also was denied. It’s one thing to regulate media access if the room had been chaotic and overrun by cameras, but that wasn’t the case here.

Why should a documentary filmmaker, exercising his First Amendment rights, be denied the right to film a public hearing? If every person filming a hearing is required to have a certain press credential, Congressional Staff or the Capitol Police should have helped Fox obtain one, not arrest him… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Huffington Post>

Here is Josh’s side of the story, which he revealed in an interview with Ed Schultz.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I have no doubt that Josh Fox had a Constitutional right to cover the hearing under the First Amendment.  Republicans denied that right.  They don’t want you to know that they are covering up the truth about fracking, so the Constitution does not matter top them.

Now, I have a major bone to pick with Obama on his fracking policy, but even on this issue, the Republicans are infinitely worse.

Share
 

There are few lies Republicans will not tell to demonize the poor, as justification for cutting off the needy to give bigger tax cuts and subsidies to the greedy.  Many of those lies are quite absurd, like this one.  Those lazy, good for nothing [minority implied] wastrels are cashing their federal benefits and running to the strip club for a lap dance.  They are so serious about propagandizing US voters with this BS, that they are actually trying to pass a law to prevent their made-up complaint.

2stripperheelsThe GOP is cultivating a staggeringly disdainful view of Americans who are struggling to get by in the wake of the Great Recession. Seeking to gut the social safety net programs on which an increasing number of Americans rely, Republicans have demonized the poor as dependent, lazy drug-users who pilfer Uncle Sam for trips to Hawaii. In that vein, House Republicans are bringing a bill to the floor today to ensure that low-income Americans don’t use federal benefits to pay for “lap dances.”

The bill’s sponsor Rep. Charles Boustany Jr. (R-LA) says he’s trying to close a “strip-club loophole” which allows beneficiaries of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program use state-issued debit cards at strip clubs, casinos, and liquor stores. “It’s pretty rampant around the country,” he insists.

Naturally, no one thinks adult entertainment is an appropriate use for TANF funds. But as Center for American Progress Action Fund’s Melissa Boteach notes, the use of funds at strip clubs, liquor stores, and casinos is hardly a “pressing national crisis,” but rather a politically valuable message for the GOP, regardless of its veracity, because it’s useful to the GOP to paint vulnerable Americans as “delinquent and criminally inclined“… [emphasis added]

Inserted from <Think Progress>

On the other hand, maybe I’m being to quick to dismiss the Republicans’ absurd claims.  After all, when it comes to strip clubs, I have to admit that they are a Republican area of expertise, as this Rachel Maddow video from March 2010 reveals.

In addition, the strip clubs and other adult “entertainers” in Tampa, FL are drooling in anticipation of the Republican convention this fall, as Cenk Uygur explains.

When I lived in Phoenix in the 1970s, I had a friend, who was a call girl.  It was not a professional relationship.  She explained to me that when Republicans came to town for meetings, especially Republican Supply-side pseudo-Christians, the local girls had to import friends from Las Vegas, because the locals could not handle the huge increase in business.

In light of all the above, isn’t accusing needy people of this the epitome of hypocrisy?

Share
 

Yesterday I went to get a haircut, but my barber was out, so I reset for Friday.  I worked on end of the month record keeping, and put up a new poll.  I’m current with replies.  Today I’ll do the data collection for Thursday’s Monthly Report.

Jig Zone Puzzle:

Today it took me 4:15 (average 5:50).  To do it, click here.  How did you do?

Short Takes:

From CNET: A new online petition is demanding that Apple clean up its act overseas in time to make its next iPhone “the first ethical iPhone.”

Watchdog group SumOfUs last week put up a petition asking Apple to “make the iPhone 5 ethically,” referring to the company’s use of overseas manufacturing from companies such as Foxconn, which have recently come under fire for their working conditions and practices.

While I can’s see myself ever purchasing an I[anything], I signed and support the petition.  Apple makes such huge profits that they don’t need to support wage-slavery to increase their profit.

From LA Times: Congressional Democrats, more liberal since the 2010 elections thinned out moderates’ ranks, are embracing the populist agenda President Obama outlined in his State of the Union speech. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is planning votes all spring and summer in an attempt to end the tax breaks that corporations and wealthy individuals like Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney enjoy.

Good!  Congressional Democrats are more representative, since the Blue Dog massacre of 2010.

From Think Progress: Massachusetts Senate Candidate Elizabeth Warren (D) published an op-ed today criticizing her opponent, Sen. Scott Brown (R), for his opposition to the Buffett Rule, a proposal by the Obama administration to implement a 30 percent minimum tax on millionaires.

Republicans want YOU to pay higher taxes, so millionaires can pay even less.

Cartoon:

1Cartoon

Share
© 2011 Politics Plus Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha