<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Politics Plus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog</link>
	<description>Overcoming right wing insanity, one day at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread&#8211;2/20/2011 by John Dasef</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/open-thread2202011-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36767</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dasef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7208#comment-36767</guid>
		<description>They would try, and when they failed, they&#039;d blame the progressives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would try, and when they failed, they&#8217;d blame the progressives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread&#8211;2/20/2011 by Lynn Squance</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/open-thread2202011-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36766</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Squance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7208#comment-36766</guid>
		<description>UPDATE TO THE STORY ON PP:  &lt;a id=&quot;feed_title-3105721&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.care2.com/news/go/3105721&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Online Surveillance Bill (C-30) Opens Door for Big Brother&lt;/a&gt;

The following is an update e-mail I received today.  I hope that more will sign the petition and tell your friends about it  The response from Toews is typical of the Harper government, and in particular Mr Harper himself.  He uses any tactics that he thinks will get people to buckle down.  But we have to push back with the typical &quot;Hell NO, we won&#039;t go!!!&quot;  As Christian Nadeau, a professor at l&#039;Université de Montréal and author of Rogue in Power says, Harper is remaking Canada by stealth, and this is how!  Please SIGN THE PETITION, Canadians and Americans alike, at the end of the original article on Politics Plus.  Thanks

&quot;Over 106,000 of you have spoken out against online spying1, but Public Safety Minister Vic Toews still isn’t getting the message. Toews recently suggested that anyone opposed to his legislation (that’s you) is standing with child pornographers. Those critics include 8 in 10 Canadians2 (again, you) and all thirteen of Canada’s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons3—everyone who is against warrantless access to our private information.

Toews is using disgusting tactics and misleading Canadians4. We need to scale up our public pressure campaign to stop him and his online spying plan.

Toews’ comments appear to be part of a coordinated effort to use the safety of children as political cover5, and we need to scale up our efforts to stop it. Instead of apologizing or committing to meaningful changes to the bill, Vic Toews is unleashing a PR storm with the same old talking points.

With your help, we can tell Toews:

- It’s not okay use our fears against us. We’ll fight back with local actions in key ridings across the country.
- It’s not okay to mislead Canadians. We’ll push for meaningful changes to this bill with targeted online ads.
- It’s not okay to invade our personal privacy. We’ll launch a sophisticated online video to ensure Canadians know what Vic Toews is doing.

P.S. We can’t let this truly offensive charade go unchallenged. It’s disgusting, and quite frankly immoral and un-Canadian.

Footnotes
[1] Over 106K Canadians have added their names to the petition at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://stopspying.ca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://StopSpying.ca&lt;/a&gt;

[2] A survey from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada indicates that vast majority of Canadians oppose warrantless online spying.

[3] See this letter to Public Safety Canada from Canada&#039;s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons

[4] See the CBC article, Online surveillance bill opens door for Big Brother

[5] See the Postmedia article, Can you spot the difference on “lawful access” bill?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE TO THE STORY ON PP:  <a id="feed_title-3105721" target="_blank" href="http://www.care2.com/news/go/3105721" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Online Surveillance Bill (C-30) Opens Door for Big Brother</a></p>
<p>The following is an update e-mail I received today.  I hope that more will sign the petition and tell your friends about it  The response from Toews is typical of the Harper government, and in particular Mr Harper himself.  He uses any tactics that he thinks will get people to buckle down.  But we have to push back with the typical &#8220;Hell NO, we won&#8217;t go!!!&#8221;  As Christian Nadeau, a professor at l&#8217;Université de Montréal and author of Rogue in Power says, Harper is remaking Canada by stealth, and this is how!  Please SIGN THE PETITION, Canadians and Americans alike, at the end of the original article on Politics Plus.  Thanks</p>
<p>&#8220;Over 106,000 of you have spoken out against online spying1, but Public Safety Minister Vic Toews still isn’t getting the message. Toews recently suggested that anyone opposed to his legislation (that’s you) is standing with child pornographers. Those critics include 8 in 10 Canadians2 (again, you) and all thirteen of Canada’s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons3—everyone who is against warrantless access to our private information.</p>
<p>Toews is using disgusting tactics and misleading Canadians4. We need to scale up our public pressure campaign to stop him and his online spying plan.</p>
<p>Toews’ comments appear to be part of a coordinated effort to use the safety of children as political cover5, and we need to scale up our efforts to stop it. Instead of apologizing or committing to meaningful changes to the bill, Vic Toews is unleashing a PR storm with the same old talking points.</p>
<p>With your help, we can tell Toews:</p>
<p>- It’s not okay use our fears against us. We’ll fight back with local actions in key ridings across the country.<br />
- It’s not okay to mislead Canadians. We’ll push for meaningful changes to this bill with targeted online ads.<br />
- It’s not okay to invade our personal privacy. We’ll launch a sophisticated online video to ensure Canadians know what Vic Toews is doing.</p>
<p>P.S. We can’t let this truly offensive charade go unchallenged. It’s disgusting, and quite frankly immoral and un-Canadian.</p>
<p>Footnotes<br />
[1] Over 106K Canadians have added their names to the petition at <a target="_blank" href="http://stopspying.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://StopSpying.ca</a></p>
<p>[2] A survey from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada indicates that vast majority of Canadians oppose warrantless online spying.</p>
<p>[3] See this letter to Public Safety Canada from Canada&#8217;s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons</p>
<p>[4] See the CBC article, Online surveillance bill opens door for Big Brother</p>
<p>[5] See the Postmedia article, Can you spot the difference on “lawful access” bill?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread&#8211;2/20/2011 by Lynn Squance</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/open-thread2202011-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36765</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Squance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7208#comment-36765</guid>
		<description>Jerry, you crack me up!  I&#039;d love to see how they would enforce those laws!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, you crack me up!  I&#8217;d love to see how they would enforce those laws!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online surveillance bill  (C-30) opens door for Big Brother by Lynn Squance</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/18/online-surveillance-bill-c-30-opens-door-for-big-brother/comment-page-1/#comment-36764</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Squance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7112#comment-36764</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: The following is an update e-mail I received today.  I hope that more will sign the petition and tell your friends about it  The response from Toews is typical of the Harper government, and in particular Mr Harper himself.  He uses any tactics that he thinks will get people to buckle down.  But we have to push back with the typical &quot;Hell NO, we won&#039;t go!!!&quot;  As Christian Nadeau, a professor at l&#039;Université de Montréal and author of Rogue in Power says, Harper is remaking Canada by stealth, and this is how!  Please SIGN THE PETITION, Canadians and Americans alike, at the end of the original article on Politics Plus.  Thanks

&quot;Over 106,000 of you have spoken out against online spying1, but Public Safety Minister Vic Toews still isn’t getting the message. Toews recently suggested that anyone opposed to his legislation (that’s you) is standing with child pornographers. Those critics include 8 in 10 Canadians2 (again, you) and all thirteen of Canada’s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons3—everyone who is against warrantless access to our private information.

Toews is using disgusting tactics and misleading Canadians4. We need to scale up our public pressure campaign to stop him and his online spying plan.

Toews’ comments appear to be part of a coordinated effort to use the safety of children as political cover5, and we need to scale up our efforts to stop it. Instead of apologizing or committing to meaningful changes to the bill, Vic Toews is unleashing a PR storm with the same old talking points.

With your help, we can tell Toews:

- It’s not okay use our fears against us. We’ll fight back with local actions in key ridings across the country.
- It’s not okay to mislead Canadians. We’ll push for meaningful changes to this bill with targeted online ads.
- It’s not okay to invade our personal privacy. We’ll launch a sophisticated online video to ensure Canadians know what Vic Toews is doing.

P.S. We can’t let this truly offensive charade go unchallenged. It’s disgusting, and quite frankly immoral and un-Canadian.

Footnotes
[1] Over 106K Canadians have added their names to the petition at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://stopspying.ca/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://StopSpying.ca&lt;/a&gt;

[2] A survey from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada indicates that vast majority of Canadians oppose warrantless online spying.

[3] See this letter to Public Safety Canada from Canada&#039;s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons

[4] See the CBC article, Online surveillance bill opens door for Big Brother

[5] See the Postmedia article, Can you spot the difference on “lawful access” bill?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: The following is an update e-mail I received today.  I hope that more will sign the petition and tell your friends about it  The response from Toews is typical of the Harper government, and in particular Mr Harper himself.  He uses any tactics that he thinks will get people to buckle down.  But we have to push back with the typical &#8220;Hell NO, we won&#8217;t go!!!&#8221;  As Christian Nadeau, a professor at l&#8217;Université de Montréal and author of Rogue in Power says, Harper is remaking Canada by stealth, and this is how!  Please SIGN THE PETITION, Canadians and Americans alike, at the end of the original article on Politics Plus.  Thanks</p>
<p>&#8220;Over 106,000 of you have spoken out against online spying1, but Public Safety Minister Vic Toews still isn’t getting the message. Toews recently suggested that anyone opposed to his legislation (that’s you) is standing with child pornographers. Those critics include 8 in 10 Canadians2 (again, you) and all thirteen of Canada’s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons3—everyone who is against warrantless access to our private information.</p>
<p>Toews is using disgusting tactics and misleading Canadians4. We need to scale up our public pressure campaign to stop him and his online spying plan.</p>
<p>Toews’ comments appear to be part of a coordinated effort to use the safety of children as political cover5, and we need to scale up our efforts to stop it. Instead of apologizing or committing to meaningful changes to the bill, Vic Toews is unleashing a PR storm with the same old talking points.</p>
<p>With your help, we can tell Toews:</p>
<p>- It’s not okay use our fears against us. We’ll fight back with local actions in key ridings across the country.<br />
- It’s not okay to mislead Canadians. We’ll push for meaningful changes to this bill with targeted online ads.<br />
- It’s not okay to invade our personal privacy. We’ll launch a sophisticated online video to ensure Canadians know what Vic Toews is doing.</p>
<p>P.S. We can’t let this truly offensive charade go unchallenged. It’s disgusting, and quite frankly immoral and un-Canadian.</p>
<p>Footnotes<br />
[1] Over 106K Canadians have added their names to the petition at <a target="_blank" href="http://stopspying.ca/" rel="nofollow">http://StopSpying.ca</a></p>
<p>[2] A survey from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada indicates that vast majority of Canadians oppose warrantless online spying.</p>
<p>[3] See this letter to Public Safety Canada from Canada&#8217;s Privacy Commissioners and Ombudspersons</p>
<p>[4] See the CBC article, Online surveillance bill opens door for Big Brother</p>
<p>[5] See the Postmedia article, Can you spot the difference on “lawful access” bill?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread&#8211;2/20/2011 by Jerry Critter</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/open-thread2202011-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Critter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7208#comment-36763</guid>
		<description>Using Santorum&#039;s logic, we should outlaw sex because sex could lead to abortions.  Yes, we should also outlaw marriage because it could lead to abortions.  While we are at it, let&#039;s outlaw puberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Santorum&#8217;s logic, we should outlaw sex because sex could lead to abortions.  Yes, we should also outlaw marriage because it could lead to abortions.  While we are at it, let&#8217;s outlaw puberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney Loses a Racist Hypocrite by PeopleRStupid</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/19/romney-loses-a-racist-hypocrite/comment-page-1/#comment-36762</link>
		<dc:creator>PeopleRStupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7204#comment-36762</guid>
		<description>Since you spelled offense wrong twice, I know it wasn&#039;t just a typo!  This man&#039;s behavior is not typical of all Republicans! That would be like me calling all Democrats ignorant wretches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you spelled offense wrong twice, I know it wasn&#8217;t just a typo!  This man&#8217;s behavior is not typical of all Republicans! That would be like me calling all Democrats ignorant wretches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread&#8211;2/20/2011 by Jerry Critter</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/open-thread2202011-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36761</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Critter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7208#comment-36761</guid>
		<description>3:17  The one minute rule worked for me today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3:17  The one minute rule worked for me today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Should Go Solar by Eric B.</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/obama-should-go-solar/comment-page-1/#comment-36760</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7214#comment-36760</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather see the solar energy funds spent putting panels on all public school and federally owned building roofs.  The jobs would be where the people already live, there would be no need to destroy pristine desert, and the energy can use existing transmission lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather see the solar energy funds spent putting panels on all public school and federally owned building roofs.  The jobs would be where the people already live, there would be no need to destroy pristine desert, and the energy can use existing transmission lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Should Go Solar by isa</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/obama-should-go-solar/comment-page-1/#comment-36759</link>
		<dc:creator>isa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7214#comment-36759</guid>
		<description>i got all excited...till I realized that Energy Secretary Chu statement was released 10/20/11...

..It would appear that replacing the solar panels on the residential part of the White House would be an easy beginning.  What is holding up the action.?

And why did Reagan remove Carter&#039;s additive in the first place?.  We can only assume it was the pressure from those that are profiting from oil and gas industries.  So, what can we do to stop them from stomping on the common good that will reap immediate benefits and repay us long into the future?

&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got all excited&#8230;till I realized that Energy Secretary Chu statement was released 10/20/11&#8230;</p>
<p>..It would appear that replacing the solar panels on the residential part of the White House would be an easy beginning.  What is holding up the action.?</p>
<p>And why did Reagan remove Carter&#8217;s additive in the first place?.  We can only assume it was the pressure from those that are profiting from oil and gas industries.  So, what can we do to stop them from stomping on the common good that will reap immediate benefits and repay us long into the future?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s Policies Are Working by Helena</title>
		<link>http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2012/02/20/obamas-policies-are-working/comment-page-1/#comment-36757</link>
		<dc:creator>Helena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=7211#comment-36757</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree that Obama has done more good than harm and would have done more good if the Republicans stopped fighting him at every turn. If he had had a majority the US would have had faster recovery but the American people are sometimes too blind to see past parties per se and just vote for the guy who has the intelligence and competence to see it through. We know the president is smart and capable but until he can pursue his policies without obstacles aka Republicans, his hands are pretty tied. I hope the Americans can see that this time round and give the president a real chance of doing what he needs to do for their country and their welfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree that Obama has done more good than harm and would have done more good if the Republicans stopped fighting him at every turn. If he had had a majority the US would have had faster recovery but the American people are sometimes too blind to see past parties per se and just vote for the guy who has the intelligence and competence to see it through. We know the president is smart and capable but until he can pursue his policies without obstacles aka Republicans, his hands are pretty tied. I hope the Americans can see that this time round and give the president a real chance of doing what he needs to do for their country and their welfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.335 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-22 11:45:38 -->

