GOPBullIn the Florida Primary, there were no surprises. Romney beat Gingrich by a 14% margin, largely because he spent almost ten times what Gingrich spent on advertising.  Santorum was a distant third and Ron Paul mattered so little that he could not even pull 10%.  Gingrich was such a bad loser that he did not even give Romney the customary phone call congratulating him.  Romney won 50 delegates, but that’s more complicated than meets the eye.  We’ll go into that.  Also, we’ll cover the Important Election.

Here are the  election results for Florida.

Florida

 

 

 

Goose Stepper

Votes

Percent

Delegates

Romney

771,842

46%

50

Gingrich

531,294

32%

0

Santorum

222,248

13%

0

Paul

116,776

7%

0

Total

1,642,160

 

 

And here is the latest delegate count.

Delegates

 

Romney

84

Gingrich

27

Paul

10

Santorum

8

Florida gets only 50 delegates, instead if their normal 99, because The Republican controlled state government moved up the primary earlier that RNC rules would permit.  The RNC penalized Florida by taking half their delegates.  The RNC also has a new rule forbidding winner take all primaries.  But the government of Florida broke that rule too, figuring that they have already received the RNC’s maximum punishment.  However, at the convention, any Gingrich supporter can challenge the distribution of delegates to the credentials committee.  They may well override Florida and redistribute the delegates proportionally.

The most important thing to know is that if any of these candidates becomes President, YOU lose!

In the important election, I’m pleased to announce that Suzanne Bonamici is Oregon’s new representative in the First Congressional District, and congratulate her on a well deserved win.

1Bonamici

Currently, Bonamici leads 54% to 39% with 68% of precincts in.

After running a very dirty campaign, Rob Cornilles has once again been rejected by Oregon voters, who were too well informed to believe his lies.  Cornilles ignored the Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not commit Teabuggery!

Share
 

26State-of-the-Union-2012

I missed Obama’s State of the Union address, because I was doing volunteer work in prison at the time and did not get to see it until yesterday morning, so please color this better late than never.  I have the full enhanced video of the speech, followed by my own notes in raw format.  I did not like everything I heard, but I did like far more than I disliked.

Here is the video:

And here are my raw notes.  Boo indicates that I heard Republicans booing the President at that point.

He opened with the end of the Iraq war, the death of Osama bin Laden, the disruption of Al Qaeda, and the ability to cut forces in Afghanistan.  He used the teamwork of our military as an example of the teamwork that there should be in Congress.

 

He stressed that everyone must get a fair shot, do their fair share, and play by the same set of the years.

 

He describes the onset of the financial crisis.  Businesses have created more than 3 million Jobs since Obama’s policies took effect.

 

He accurately described the State of the Union as "getting stronger".

 

He said he will work with anyone, but will fight obstruction and oppose policies that would return us to the conditions that  brought on the recession.

 

He praised the auto industry for their success since we saved it.  He stressed insourcing to bring manufacturing jobs home.

 

He called for ending the tax deduction for outsourcing and creating one for insourcing.  He proposed  a Basic Minimum Tax on companies who move jobs and profits overseas and use the revenues generated to give tax cuts for companies that create jobs. (Boo)

 

He has created a Trade Enforcement group to combat unfair trade practices by foreign nations.  He proposed a bold jobs training program, and called on Congress to support community colleges and reemployment programs. (Boo)

 

He called for support for teachers giving schools the resources to retain good teachers, pay the best ones more, and discharge those who are ineffective.  Proposed that all students to be requires to stay in high school.  Congress must stop the interest on student loans from doubling in July [as Republicans scheduled it to do].  Funding for colleges must be contingent on their ability to hold tuition costs down.

 

Obama said he has increased border security, and now we need comprehensive immigration reform, and called for a dream act in the interim. (Boo)

 

He said women must earn equal pay for equal work.

 

He said to give tax relief to small businesses, to fund research,  and to open more oil and gas resources.  He said gas companies must disclose the chemicals they use and those must be regulated for human and environmental safety.  We need an all of the above strategy, so we also need to develop green energy.  End the tax subsidies for fossil fuels and give them to green energy.  We need to help manufactures use less energy through conservation.

 

We need to repair and upgrade America’s infrastructure.  Invest 50% of war savings on infrastructure. (Boo)

 

Allow American homeowners to refinance at lower interest rates.

 

We need to both remove outdated regulations and add more regulations that protect Americans.  He said he has added less regulations than Bush did in his first six years.  He stressed the CFPB and Richard Cordray.  (Boo)

 

He announced a special investigation unit, made up of DOJ personnel and state Attorneys General to investigate the criminal Wall Street mortgage practices that caused the crisis.

 

He called for passage of the payroll tax cut without side issues and drama. (Boo)

 

He called for deficit reduction using the Buffet Rule where people making over $1 million must pay a minimum of 30%.  It is not class warfare to say a billionaire should pay more than his secretary.  It is common sense. (Boo)

 

Ban insider trading by members of Congress.  (BIG Boo)

 

All judicial nominations should receive an up or down vote within 90 days.

 

Allow him to consolidate the federal bureaucracy.

 

He called on Republicans to help, as we should all work together for a smarter, more effective actions.

 

He returned to the success that our troops have achieved through teamwork, and listed other foreign policy successes.  He said that the renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe.  "America is back!"  "Anyone who tells you America is in decline does not know what they are talking about."  He praised the troops.  He said he has increased VA spending every year [over Republican opposition].

 

He said we all need to learn from out troops.  We all need to do our jobs and get each others’ backs.

Next here is a complete detailed analysis of the Republican Response

26GOPBS

In my opinion his outreach to Republicans is futile, as I woke up this morning to the sound of Republicans ranting and raving about class warfare on MSNBC.  However, he displayed authentic patriotism, so different that the phony flag-wrapping Republicans do.

Considering the available choices there is a virtually infinite gulf between Obama and either of his Republican opponents. (Santorum has frothed out.  Paul never mattered and never will.)  He did an excellent job in making that gulf apparent.

91% of Americans polled said they approved of what Obama proposed.  9% opposed it.  I count myself in the 91%.

Share
 

11debateYesterday Suzanne Bonamici (D) and David Cornilles (R) debated to fill the vacancy in Oregon’s First Congressional District of the US House to be filled in a special election on January 31.  To someone politically knowledgeable, Bonamici was the clear winner.  To the uniformed, it might not have been so obvious.  Here are my observations.

Experience: Bonamici has public service experience as an attorney, a FTC consumer advocate and a state legislator.  Cornilles owns a sports marketing company with five employees.

Infrastructure: Cornilles favors infrastructure spending and would cut social programs to pay for it.  So does Bonamici, but she did not specify how to pay for it.

Job Creation: Cornilles favors tax cuts for corporations and deregulation to create jobs.  Bonamici would invest in job creation by ending the Bush tax cuts for the top 2%.

Health care: Bonamici said universal health care is a right.  Cornilles said to increase access by reducing cost.

Medicare: Cornilles likes the Wyden-Ryan plan.  Bonamici dies not.  (Nobody actually knows what it is, but many think it is optional privatization).

Housing Market: Bonamici would reinvigorate it with strong consumer protection.  Cornilles would by deregulating banks.

Scandals: Cornilles blamed a bookkeeper for the payroll $83,000 tax lien on his business. (Horse Feathers) Bonamici denied covering up the Wu scandal.

SOPA and PIPA: Both oppose.

Social Security: Bonamici said raise the cap, don’t cut benefits, and do not privatize.  Cornilles said he opposed cutting benefits and preferred the bipartisan Simpson-Boles plan. (The Simpson-Boles plan was to cut benefits, raise the retirement age, and reduce CPI increases, so Cornilles was lying).

Undocumented immigrants: Cornilles said no amnesty and strengthen border.  Bonamici prefers a path to citizenship for undocumented workers, who have obeyed the law while here.

Keystone XL Pipeline: Bonamici opposes it.  Cornilles supports it.

Iran: Cornilles prefers not to attack UNTIL we have a plan and an exit strategy.  Bonamici favors diplomacy, development efforts and sanctions.

Online Charter Schools: Bonamici opposes funding private schools with public funds.  Cornilles supports funding them.

Global Climate Change: Bonamici recognizes it.  Cornilles does not.

Citizens United: Cornilles supports the decision.  Bonamici does not.

Cornilles made a big deal about how Bonamici has never created a job.  That was a lie, because Bonamici hired her staff as a lawyer.  As much as Cornilles pretends to be a big time job creator, his company employs five.

The issues alone make it clear that Bonamici is the only sane choice, but I have failed to convey the emotional tenor of the debate.  Bonamici treated Cornilles with courtesy and respect through out.  Cornilles was openly hostile, repeatedly accused Bonamici of lying, and stayed in attack mode.  His advertisement against Bonamici have earned him a “pants on fire” rating.

Protect Oregon’s future.  Elect Suzanne Bonamici!

Share
 

7CFPB-LogoWhen President Barack Obama recess appointed Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and three members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), he ignited a controversy between Democrats and Republicans that could grow into a Constitutional crisis.  Many Republicans are saying that Obama has trashed the Constitution.  Many Democrats are saying that Obama’s appointments are no different that the the recess appointments by previous Presidents.  Both sides are wrong.  Here is why.

The President has the authority to make recess appointments when the Senate is not in session for fifteen days or more.  Otherwise, he is required to submit his nominees for the Senate to advise and consent.

We are currently in the month called the Christmas Recess, but Republicans have have held a pro-forma session, a session lasting for seconds only, every three days.  They have announced that there will no business conducted in these sessions.  It is their position that, since the Senate has not had fifteen days when it was out of session, Obama’s appointments are not legal.  They are correct that, in 2007, Democrats used the same tactic to block the recess appointment of John Bolton, the extreme Neocon who violently opposed the UN, as US Ambassador to the UN.

It is Obama’s position  that pro-forma sessions are not legitimate sessions, because b Republicans did state they have no intent to conduct business, and therefore, pro-forma sessions cannot count against the fifteen day requirement.  If effect, Obama has been saying that the Senate has been out of session the entire time, making his appointments legal.

This is different from recess appointments Republicans have made, because Obama’s justification is unique, having never been used before.  But the Republican claim that Obama is trashing the Constitution is equally untrue.  Obama is not trashing the Constitution, because there is no precedent to determine the constitutionality of the act.

So the constitutional question here is whether or not a mere pro-forma session is legitimate for the purpose of obstructing Presidential recess appointments during a recess that is longer than fifteen days.

To make a legal challenge to this Republicans must correctly cast themselves in the role of favoring their own obstruction of legitimate functions of government in order to assist corporate criminals to prey on American consumers and to assist other criminal corporate criminals to deny workers’ rights.  They have foolishly painted themselves into another corner.

That said, I cannot say how such a challenge might come out, but I could not be more pleased that Obama has thrown down this gauntlet.

To further explain, here is Lawrence O’Donnell’s take on it, including his interview with new CFPB Director, Richard Cordray.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Please take special note of Elizabeth Warren’s two segments in the video.  Also note that a Republican administration could appoint a CFPB Director that could transform the CFPB into a tool to assist Banksters in their predations on the 99%.  This is one more reason that keeping Republicans out of the White House is a generational imperative.

Share
 

4Iowa

Iowa is over, for all intents and purposes, and it did not matter who won.  With 100% of the votes counted, the top two candidates are separated by only eight votes, so both will take six delegates in Iowa.  Here are the final results:

Iowa

 

 

 

Goose Stepper

Votes

Percent

Delegates

Romney

30,015

25%

6

Santorum

30,007

25%

6

Paul

26,219

21%

4

Gingrich

16,251

13%

1

Perry

12,604

10%

1

Bachmann

6,073

5%

0

Huntsman

745

1%

0

Total

121,914

 

 

Ron Paul had the highest finish he will ever have and will quickly fade, even though his acolytes seem to think he’s winning.

Rich Perry is suspending his campaign.

The difference between Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann is that Bachmann is too stupid to know it’s over.

At this point, I’d really like to crack a joke, but nothing that comes to mind could be more comical than the reality here.

In the caucuses that matter, 25,000 Democrats turned out, even though they were uncontested.

Share
 

3IowaFor the last couple of weeks  the race between Republicans to win the Iowa caucuses has dominated the news.  Millions od dollars have been spent.  Pundits have agonized over the unpredictability of the race, and it’s impossible to turn on news without seeing a talking head drone on about the subject.  So I asked myself if the Iowa Caucuses are important enough to justify all the attention.

Here are the latest standings, according to the Chicago Sun Times.

24 percent Mitt Romney

22 percent Ron Paul

15 percent Rick Santorum

12 percent Newt Gingrich

11 percent Rick Perry

7 percent Michele Bachmann

The Republican Party is not really representative of Iowa.  Obama won the state by a 10 point margin.

In addition, the Iowa caucuses are not really representative of Iowa Republicans.  Only the most dedicated activists attend. According to the New York Times, the 2008 caucuses set an attendance record, but attracted only 118,192 voters.

Now, let’s assume that both that they equal their record, and that one of the above losers wins 51% of the vote, absurd though that may be.  51% of 118,192 votes equals 60,278 votes for the winner.

Moving along, I live in Portland OR, home of 583,876 people.  60,278 would represent 10.3% od Portland’s population.  If I were to say to you,  “10.3% of Portlanders like Mitt Romney,” you might say, “So what?”

Lets look at this another way.  There are approximately 169,000,000 registered voters in the US.  60,278 would represent .036%.  That’s 3.6 one hundredths of one percent, an insignificant number.  Seen in that light the Iowa caucuses hardly matter at all.

What we have been experiencing here is pure media hype, and it gives a small handful of activists a lot more influence  than they warrant.

Share
 

11Debate

Yesterday I turned on the TV, and lined up my barf bags, backed up by my trash can, my pocket and my shoes, to watch the Republican debate.  The lies flowed like water.  Here are the notes I took in their raw format, with no attempts to polish the writing and just a little evaluation at the end.  I’ll leave most of that to you.

Diane Sawyer opened by praising all six for their commitment to democracy.  That knocked out barf bag #1. She might as well have called Donald Trump a beauty pageant winner.

Diane Sawyer asked all six about jobs. She asked for the number of jobs they could create, a time frame for creating them and an idea. None of the six gave a number or a time frame except Romney, 11.5 million in a year. The newest idea was to blame Obama.  The rest date back to before Obama was President.

On the payroll tax cut, Bachmann and Santorum opposed and lied that it takes the funds from the Social Security trust fund. Romney and Paul supported but wandered into talking points.

Romney said Obama wants an entitlement society, while he wants a merit society.

Gingrich said he wants to expand the space program and doubled down on child labor.

Paul attacked Romney on “liberal” positions and taking money from Freddie Mac.

Bachmann accused Gingrich of being a lobbyist and Romney of inventing Obamacare. She called them Newt Romney. Perry backed Bachmann’s accusations. All accused both Gingrich and Romney of supporting individual mandates. Santorum said that he alone supported Medical Savings accounts. He said that he is the only winner, despite having lost his last Senate race.

Bachmann promised to help elect a Republican supermajority in both houses of Congress.

Perry said voters should consider marital fidelity as a characteristic of a candidate’s fitness to serve. Santorum, Paul, Romney, and Bachmann all agreed. Gingrich did too and said he has changed.

Gingrich said most undocumented immigrants should be exported, but said there could be exceptions, based on local citizen review. Romney said send to them all home and put them at the end of the line. Perry we should enforce existing law.

Are Palestinians an invented people, as Gingrich said? Paul said no. Gingrich accused Obama of acting like Israel has no right to exist. Romney said no, but we should support Israel’s positions regardless. Bachmann ducked the questions and blamed the Palestinians for all the problems in the region. Santorum said that what Gingrich said is true, but imprudent. Perry blamed the press for blowing a minor issue out of proportion.

When did you last have to cut back on necessities? Perry said he grew up poor. Romney admitted to always being rich. Paul said it was when he was growing up. Santorum said he is middle class and never had to cut back on necessities. Bachman said it was in her teens. Gingrich said he was middle class, but had never gone without necessities.

What should government so about unhealthy habits? Paul said nothing, that government should not force anyone to do anything. Perry said it’s up to the states.

What did you learn from one of your challengers on stage? Santorum said Gingrich had been his roll model when he first entered politics. Perry said that Ron Paul had gotten him interested in the Federal Reserve. Romney said Ron Paul has enthusiastic followers. Gingrich said Perry got him engaged as a tenther and Santorum got him interested in Iran. Paul ducked. Bachmann said Cain inspired her with 9-9-9.

There were no major gaffes.  I would say the debate had two winners.  First is Gingrich, because Romney needed to score significant points against him and failed to do so.  Second is Bachmann, because her attacks against both Gingrich and Romney were well presented and factually true.  The moderators failed thoroughly in their fourth estate duty.  They asked mostly softball questions, and did not even touch such important issues as Republican plans to privatize Social Security, replace Medicare with a coupon, and convert Medicaid to a state voucher program.  They also failed to touch on the huge inequity between the 1% and the rest of us.  They did not even mention Republican obstruction.  Therefore, the big losers in this debate are the American people, because ABC did notr do their job honestly.

Share
© 2011 Politics Plus Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha